Yosharian
Arcane
You can select from different penises? Umm... Where do I begin with this one
This part is very true and probably the thing I'm most worried about despite enjoying the EA and looking forward to release. It mostly works in the Divinity series (probably because it's their world and they set the tone) and in the EA since nothing too serious is happening but I'm concerned that they might lean into it at the wrong moments later in BG3 and it will pull the player out of the experience. Still cautiously optimistic overall though.I've been playing through DOS2, reminding myself again of the Larian "vibe."
It's a mixture of really taking the CRPG seriously as an adventure simulator, and at the same time being so embarrassed that you're such a nerd that you nervously dot the experience with awkward college humour that sometimes lands, but mostly doesn't. I would guess that this comes from a love of tabletop gameplay. It's really perfectly encapsulated by the Larian symbol of the fighter with a toilet plunger.
The obvious comparison is PoE and D:OS. D:OS "won" the argument even though both games had the same fundamental philosophy, even to the point of referring to Baldur's Gate as an influence (much to Swen's chagrin, but still). The problem with Pillars wasn't just a thing of tech, it was it lacked something that BG and DOS kinda share, and that it's kinda difficult to grasp, but it's summed up by this:They are objecting to good design such as reactivity, the abundant choice of character building, not against production values - cinematics and full VO.wouldn't that be the best for us as a CRPG site?
In terms of C&C, reactivity and production values this is obviously leagues above any rpg released so far and will raise the bar. Hence the whining.
Hard to argue with these statements. Whether they have voiced it or not, I assume some devs are especially salty after in one way or another snubbing the "grognard" audience. Turns out they actually knew far better that audience than the one they were unsuccessfully trying to capture, and doing so on grognard KS money. They should be feeling... not a little silly now.Now they are the face of the genre and they're there thanks to sticking to "old fashioned" stuff like turn based combat. So much for the progress that real time shit would've brought to the genre.
In any case it's hilarious listening to "the grapes are sour anyway", and "let's not set expectations that all grapes will be tasty" from people whose projects just couldn't do it, didn't know how to.
I'm the last person to praise D:OS/2 but it was obvious that there was a tech and a production pipeline being refined there for years.
D:OS is silly and probably downright stupid, but it wasn't the number crunching or the build potential that kept people interested in Baldur's Gate, or at least it wasn't the sole factor.
I see they have such prestigious posters like Fedora and Humbaba taking turns doing DEEP game analysis with comments like "this is shit" and "that is also shit" followed by The Mask larping as Infinitron all encapsulated within a forum design from the year 2003.Fled to rpghq.org because the Larian audience was too much even for him.Where's rusty_shackleford ?
Totally torn on whether to buy this game or not.
On one hand, I hate the amount of woke-ness that has seemingly infected Larian...
...on the other hand, it pales in comparison to western developers, who are also seemingly threatened by BG3's gameplay mechanics "setting a new industry standard".
As if you couldn't despise these people any more.
Lol...unbelievable
I got BG3 and Colony Ship on EA. No other games I can think of.Rare early access game I actually bought to play in early access, I never do that even for free.
Totally torn on whether to buy this game or not.
On one hand, I hate the amount of woke-ness that has seemingly infected Larian...
...on the other hand, it pales in comparison to western developers, who are also seemingly threatened by BG3's gameplay mechanics "setting a new industry standard".
As if you couldn't despise these people any more.
Lol...unbelievable
Ok, let’s not do revisionistic bullshit here, please. Larian was always woke. Divinity 2 had a quest where you had to change gender in order to complete a stage play quest. Dragon commander had a date sim built-in and etc.
Whether game is worth- just pirate it and buy later if you like it.
Totally torn on whether to buy this game or not.
On one hand, I hate the amount of woke-ness that has seemingly infected Larian...
...on the other hand, it pales in comparison to western developers, who are also seemingly threatened by BG3's gameplay mechanics "setting a new industry standard".
As if you couldn't despise these people any more.
Lol...unbelievable
Ok, let’s not do revisionistic bullshit here, please. Larian was always woke. Divinity 2 had a quest where you had to change gender in order to complete a stage play quest. Dragon commander had a date sim built-in and etc.
Whether game is worth- just pirate it and buy later if you like it.
IDK, I think the issue was that it wasn't a compelling narrative for the protagonist from the start.Issue with PoE1/2 is that to be a spiritual successor to BG1/2 it tries to be epic
I'm not, I never played Divinity 2 or Dragon Commander.Ok, let’s not do revisionistic bullshit here, please.
Totally torn on whether to buy this game or not.
On one hand, I hate the amount of woke-ness that has seemingly infected Larian...
...on the other hand, it pales in comparison to western developers, who are also seemingly threatened by BG3's gameplay mechanics "setting a new industry standard".
As if you couldn't despise these people any more.
Lol...unbelievable
Ok, let’s not do revisionistic bullshit here, please. Larian was always woke. Divinity 2 had a quest where you had to change gender in order to complete a stage play quest. Dragon commander had a date sim built-in and etc.
Whether game is worth- just pirate it and buy later if you like it.
How is having a dating sim "woke"? The contents of said dating sim in Dragon Commander were almost anachronistically super-straight by current standards. If anything I remember a lot of 4channers laughing over it in a positive way. My vague recollection of the choices were basically: hot blonde elf titty girl, lifts-her-tail lizard, and the meme of a skeleton with pumpkins inserted into her ribcage to increase bust size. The social decisions in the game allowed you to be a fag, sure, but they also allowed you to ban faggotry entirely, so again, not woke.
Dragon Commander's realm decision side of the game was honestly pretty awesome, it was the gameplay in the RTS meat of the game that sucked dick.
Divinity 2 predates wokeism as a movement entirely and it was played for laughs, just like it was in BG (no, it was never meant to be a good thing back then to change genders).
I actually disagree with this at this point. What's the last Western game you saw that showed tranny cock in character creation? Cyberpunk? If Larian isn't Western, I doubt CDPR is....on the other hand, it pales in comparison to western developers
This is a fair point though, I guess. The freedom the player is given does negate some of the woke. Though the fact that the game world treats, say, evicting unwelcome refugees as an evil act neutralizes some of that freedom.Well, you can also be super straight in BG3 and kill anyone. But it is the one woke, while the rest aren’t?
Multiple reasons, like having 10x more NPCs, cinematics that don’t look good if lighting’s not done manually and subclasses like Shadow monks or Assassins being a thing in a game where most fights happen under the sun.I'm not, I never played Divinity 2 or Dragon Commander.Ok, let’s not do revisionistic bullshit here, please.
Did not notice any woke shit in Divine Divinity, or OS1/2. Also, they could do day & night cycles in Divine Divinity, but find it too difficult now? The fuck happened?
BG 1 & 2 were Bioware's pre-infection days.So bioware and Baldur's gate was woke too then?