Dishonoredbr
Erudite
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2019
- Messages
- 2,442
hm Got it. Ngl i never played Warlock, still learning about 5E.The whole point of Warlock is the free upcast. You don’t necessarily *need* new spells.
hm Got it. Ngl i never played Warlock, still learning about 5E.The whole point of Warlock is the free upcast. You don’t necessarily *need* new spells.
Hunger of Hadar has no competition at the early levels, really
Ethan's Smite Bard uses Shar's Spear I thinkSo everyone knows how OP ranged Sword Bards are (largely due to two crazy items from late Act 2 and beginning of Act 3).
But on the melee side, I keep seeing people pushing dual-wielding or single blade dueling on Sword Bards. Cause it fits the archetype and they can get the related combat style abilities.
A mistake IMO. The best martial ability that Sword Bards get is Slashing Fluorish. Clearly OP in its ranged implementation (no shot radius/direction spread limit and you can even target the same enemy twice!).
Much less so in the melee version (effective cleave radius is much smaller then even the graphics indicator - and you often cannot cleave even enemies who are standing very near each other).
So much so that's its terribly unreliable except when you use a Reach weapon (that is glaives, halberds or pikes). Then the cleave radius perhaps doesn't change as much - but becomes much "thicker" - meaning you can cleave the enemy standing behind the enemy you're targetting. Much better, far more reliable.
This means that the best Act 3 melee weapon for the Sword Bard - because it can be used with the broken Bhaalist Armor to double Piercing damage - is the humble Breaching Pikestaff IMO. Or Hellbeard Halberd if you don't get the Bhaalist Armor. Maybe Dancing Breeze glaive if you go for Dex Finesse without the armor (but then did you not Slashing Fluorish prior to Act 3?).
Care to explain why it's so good? Always treated it as a very meh/situational spell.
Care to explain why it's so good? Always treated it as a very meh/situational spell.
Not really. Slow or Upcast Blindness are better when you're surrounded due to individual enemy targetting. Upcast Command is decent non-Concentration that often even works on bosses - but its effect is hardly comparable - its one round only.I get that it's useful but aren't there some better alternatives, uplift included?
Ethan's Smite Bard uses Shar's Spear I thinkSo everyone knows how OP ranged Sword Bards are (largely due to two crazy items from late Act 2 and beginning of Act 3).
But on the melee side, I keep seeing people pushing dual-wielding or single blade dueling on Sword Bards. Cause it fits the archetype and they can get the related combat style abilities.
A mistake IMO. The best martial ability that Sword Bards get is Slashing Fluorish. Clearly OP in its ranged implementation (no shot radius/direction spread limit and you can even target the same enemy twice!).
Much less so in the melee version (effective cleave radius is much smaller then even the graphics indicator - and you often cannot cleave even enemies who are standing very near each other).
So much so that's its terribly unreliable except when you use a Reach weapon (that is glaives, halberds or pikes). Then the cleave radius perhaps doesn't change as much - but becomes much "thicker" - meaning you can cleave the enemy standing behind the enemy you're targetting. Much better, far more reliable.
This means that the best Act 3 melee weapon for the Sword Bard - because it can be used with the broken Bhaalist Armor to double Piercing damage - is the humble Breaching Pikestaff IMO. Or Hellbeard Halberd if you don't get the Bhaalist Armor. Maybe Dancing Breeze glaive if you go for Dex Finesse without the armor (but then did you not Slashing Fluorish prior to Act 3?).
Oh its very effective. Cripples and damages enemies and offers no save. In a huge zone.Still it sounds to me more as fun spell rather than as an effective one. There're not many instances where you have to fight for long, against many targets like that towers assault for example. But I can give it suits well range-oriented party, alright.
Yeah it is a little awkward to use, but even without it, Smite + Full Caster That For Some Reason Gets Extra Attack is what makes Smite Bard deadlyEthan's Smite Bard uses Shar's Spear I thinkSo everyone knows how OP ranged Sword Bards are (largely due to two crazy items from late Act 2 and beginning of Act 3).
But on the melee side, I keep seeing people pushing dual-wielding or single blade dueling on Sword Bards. Cause it fits the archetype and they can get the related combat style abilities.
A mistake IMO. The best martial ability that Sword Bards get is Slashing Fluorish. Clearly OP in its ranged implementation (no shot radius/direction spread limit and you can even target the same enemy twice!).
Much less so in the melee version (effective cleave radius is much smaller then even the graphics indicator - and you often cannot cleave even enemies who are standing very near each other).
So much so that's its terribly unreliable except when you use a Reach weapon (that is glaives, halberds or pikes). Then the cleave radius perhaps doesn't change as much - but becomes much "thicker" - meaning you can cleave the enemy standing behind the enemy you're targetting. Much better, far more reliable.
This means that the best Act 3 melee weapon for the Sword Bard - because it can be used with the broken Bhaalist Armor to double Piercing damage - is the humble Breaching Pikestaff IMO. Or Hellbeard Halberd if you don't get the Bhaalist Armor. Maybe Dancing Breeze glaive if you go for Dex Finesse without the armor (but then did you not Slashing Fluorish prior to Act 3?).
Well, its a great weapon for sure. And it has a built-in great aoe move (that can smite all targets I think). So its a good choice.
However its Edge of Darkness is once per Short Rest, I believe. So for burst its good if you can reliably a group enemies. And if you send Shadowsheart down this path
But for normal Slashing Fluorishing 2 targets 5 times per Short Rest, I want a Reach weapon (or maybe some mod to change the Slashing Fluorish radius) - cause the default Melee Slashing Fluorish without Reach is terrible.
And if you're not using that, maybe you don't need Bard levels at all (on Honour mode rules)?
You've been there for half a year, give others a chance.How is this possible? The pokiman game is defeating me aaaargggghhh!!!
How is this possible? The pokiman game is defeating me aaaargggghhh!!!
Find me another game where you can catch a human and force it to work on a plantation and then turn it into food.How is this possible? The pokiman game is defeating me aaaargggghhh!!!
Pokemon is incredible popular and according to you popularity = quality hu3hu3
my biggest hang up is I just dont feel bardy unless I'm wearing a colorful bardy outfit, which I cant find with medium armor. I just don't feel like Jimmy Jingles the dark urge halfling bard murderer when im wearing chainmail. This leads me to my one main gripe - there are no good bardy outfit choices. the default starting armor is the closest thing to being apporpriateSo everyone knows how OP ranged Sword Bards are (largely due to two crazy items from late Act 2 and beginning of Act 3).
But on the melee side, I keep seeing people pushing dual-wielding or single blade dueling on Sword Bards. Cause it fits the archetype and they can get the related combat style abilities.
A mistake IMO. The best martial ability that Sword Bards get is Slashing Fluorish. Clearly OP in its ranged implementation (no shot radius/direction spread limit and you can even target the same enemy twice!).
Much less so in the melee version (effective cleave radius is much smaller then even the graphics indicator - and you often cannot cleave even enemies who are standing very near each other).
So much so that's its terribly unreliable except when you use a Reach weapon (that is glaives, halberds or pikes). Then the cleave radius perhaps doesn't change as much - but becomes much "thicker" - meaning you can cleave the enemy standing behind the enemy you're targetting. Much better, far more reliable.
This means that the best Act 3 melee weapon for the Sword Bard - because it can be used with the broken Bhaalist Armor to double Piercing damage - is the humble Breaching Pikestaff IMO. Or Hellbeard Halberd if you don't get the Bhaalist Armor. Maybe Dancing Breeze glaive if you go for Dex Finesse without the armor (but then did you not Slashing Fluorish prior to Act 3?).
How is this possible? The pokiman game is defeating me aaaargggghhh!!!
IDK how you can play Bard without Cutting Words. Talk about OP.my biggest hang up is I just dont feel bardy unless I'm wearing a colorful bardy outfit, which I cant find with medium armor. I just don't feel like Jimmy Jingles the dark urge halfling bard murderer when im wearing chainmail. This leads me to my one main gripe - there are no good bardy outfit choices. the default starting armor is the closest thing to being apporpriateSo everyone knows how OP ranged Sword Bards are (largely due to two crazy items from late Act 2 and beginning of Act 3).
But on the melee side, I keep seeing people pushing dual-wielding or single blade dueling on Sword Bards. Cause it fits the archetype and they can get the related combat style abilities.
A mistake IMO. The best martial ability that Sword Bards get is Slashing Fluorish. Clearly OP in its ranged implementation (no shot radius/direction spread limit and you can even target the same enemy twice!).
Much less so in the melee version (effective cleave radius is much smaller then even the graphics indicator - and you often cannot cleave even enemies who are standing very near each other).
So much so that's its terribly unreliable except when you use a Reach weapon (that is glaives, halberds or pikes). Then the cleave radius perhaps doesn't change as much - but becomes much "thicker" - meaning you can cleave the enemy standing behind the enemy you're targetting. Much better, far more reliable.
This means that the best Act 3 melee weapon for the Sword Bard - because it can be used with the broken Bhaalist Armor to double Piercing damage - is the humble Breaching Pikestaff IMO. Or Hellbeard Halberd if you don't get the Bhaalist Armor. Maybe Dancing Breeze glaive if you go for Dex Finesse without the armor (but then did you not Slashing Fluorish prior to Act 3?).
Try invading Moonrise Towers at a higher difficulty, and you will learn to respect the HUNGER OF HADAR HUNGER OF HADAR HUNGER OF HADAR HUNGER OF HADAR.Care to explain why it's so good? Always treated it as a very meh/situational spell.
Bane? Really? That's what you're using Concentration on? Hmm, IDK, kinda feels bad, man.I've got other super soldiers that want that Bane to land. Expected value of 1d8 is still 4.5 malus on any made save which is pretty nasty, especially since Bane attacks CHR.
I found that the AI is now very good at moving out of it consistently on Tactician.Oh its very effective. Cripples and damages enemies and offers no save. In a huge zone.Still it sounds to me more as fun spell rather than as an effective one. There're not many instances where you have to fight for long, against many targets like that towers assault for example. But I can give it suits well range-oriented party, alright.
Its just that when your melee martials start to steamroll content, it may no longer be as desirable - as it may slow them down then.