BTW
Someone told me, that in W3, the destiny of all kingdoms is defined as how good you sucked up Ciri's ass throughout the game.
Is it rigth?
Because, if yes, the parallels with CP are obvious.
Yeah, this was one of my main complaints about the game.
You have Geralt, a man's man, the coolest monster hunter who has ever lived, he bangs sorceresses coming and going, he's got kings on speed dial, those that don't love him fear him, he kills with no remorse, he's got the most loyal friends, he's a living legend--and he's deep, he's well read, he has philosophical ruminations and quandaries, he debates dragons and trolls on morality, basically gives no fucks, lives his life as the world is leaving him behind, and even at the end of it all is still willing to haggle down a peasant for a few more orens to kill a cockatrice (and plays a mean game of Gwent.)
and yet... none of that matters. He's not the main character, Ciri is. Ciri who is awesome just for existing, who was born with more power than Geralt will ever attain, who gets the honorary Witcher title without undergoing the actual Witcher trial that kills 60% of applicants, because she's just so gosh darn awesome she doesn't even need it.
Her outcome is dependent on Geralt's non-stop encouragement and 'self esteem'. If you tell her to calm down, be stoic, don't make rash decisions--you know, BE LIKE GERALT, she won't have enough 'Stronk Grrl Powah' to survive the endgame. You doom the world because you were too critical of her.
That's the moral of The Witcher 3.