Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Civilization VII - coming February 11th

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
14,007
It is safe to say that we all here agree that those who will play CivVII deserve harriet tubman as a leader of american civilization.
Still better than Kamala, to be fair.

At this rate it feels like only a matter of time before video games are outright political propaganda with "VOTE today!" messaging and advertisements in the big franchises. They are already giving off immense "how do you do, fellow kids" vibes with everything in this game.
 

covr

Prophet
Patron
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
1,425
Location
Warszawa

Zboj Lamignat

Arcane
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
5,799
I'm well past being angry (I didn't even bother with 6 after how shitty 5 and BE were), I'm just curious: who is nu-Civ even made for? People who don't like any challenge or depth, and too dumb to branch out into city builders?
Reminder that they are absolutely killing it popularity-wise. Civ V (five!) easily beats p much every other existing strategy game when it comes to having an active player base on steam and it's basically an ancient title with support dropped aeons ago.

I hope that VII can break this trend and join the growing flop brigade, but I'm really not betting on it. It's not only about yuge pre-exisiting fanbase, but also the fact that the competition also completely dropped the ball and this time they got a bit smart and VII looks OK presentation-wise (VI looked fucking horrid in comparison).
 

flyingjohn

Arcane
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
3,221
who is nu-Civ even made for?
For the millions that bought civ 5/6 and every single dlc. Can you make a shitty city and post it on twitter/reddit?
That is the only question they have. Reminder that 60% of civ 6 owners have never finished a single settler game or even started a war.
Civ V (five!) easily beats p much every other existing strategy game when it comes to having an active player base on steam and it's basically an ancient title with support dropped aeons ago.
Well civ v still has something going:
-Mod community active compared to 6
-Streamers like it alot more (yogscast pretty much gave the the game a boost)
-Hardcore fans like it lot more thanks to nq mod and community
Also support didn't end, they removed the 2k launcher recently. And broke the game with it.
I hope that VII can break this trend and join the growing flop brigade
Not a chance. Civ 6 with all its dlc and no proper mod support was the test, they pretty much made 10x money then on civ v. Plus, the switch version will print money. This will be the biggest civ success ever.
 

Israfael

Arcane
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
3,853
She should have a new unique trait - mostly peaceful. But it is probably a good lightning rod for Firaxis - instead of complaining about dumb AI, 1UPT heresy and other stuff most of the online crowd would wage war about DEI and other non-gaming related stuff
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2024
Messages
94
Location
Sigilville, CA
GY-jzy6WQAA5XvH
Imagine demanding 32gb and a latest gen CPU for a turn-based 4X with less features than 30 year old games such as Master of Orion. (or God forbid - SMAC)

7pbgub.png
 
Last edited:

Max Damage

Savant
Joined
Mar 1, 2017
Messages
778
*BNW
Vanilla Civ 5 and G&K brought ICS back with revenge before they nerfed everything into opposite direction in BNW, because fuck building on top of elegant sweet spot 4 achieved.
 

flyingjohn

Arcane
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
3,221
I am actually amazed at how firaxis is incompetent, yet will get away with it.
The entire point of civ switching was to make your civ feel different during all the eras. Guess which game solved that already?
Civ rev, the dumbed down console only game, had civ bonuses for each era. All they had to do was just give you more meaningful options when entering a new era and you could even lock them behind your previous decisions. It would save them money and time and they wouldn't be copying a failed humankind mechanic.
But of course they are too incompetent to even look at their previous games and have to copy amplitude again.
Also, the UI looks dogshit. Most icons and buttons just blend together into the same boring mess.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom