Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Grand Strategy Crusader Kings III

Kazuki

Arcane
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Messages
851
Location
Noodleland.
I got 500 hours in CK2 and never seen that event .

Perhaps i'm wrongly said on that, the way CK2 and CK3 handled it is different.

In my CK2 game the incest is way too happen on my game without the event like screenshot above.
 

Avarize

Magister
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Messages
1,504
Location
Handmaid's Tale
In CK2 incest didn't really happen outside zoroastrians unless you wanted it and worked for it. Seduction overall was just too easy though.
 

Hace El Oso

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jan 5, 2020
Messages
3,727
Location
Bogotá
Incredibly distant cousins at that. The Church's rules against consanguinity were extremely strict, miles more than modern law. But of course, if you spend a couple centuries marrying between just a few prominent families and your own distant family branches, then that shit adds up over time.


Church rules are still strict, or were until recently. I had a girlfriend who’s aunt and uncle were first cousins(aristocrats marrying to keep clan holdings together) and had to get special dispensation from the Archbishop to marry.
 

thesecret1

Arcane
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Messages
6,699
Church rules are still strict, or were until recently. I had a girlfriend who’s aunt and uncle were first cousins(aristocrats marrying to keep clan holdings together) and had to get special dispensation from the Archbishop to marry.
They are strict but no longer really all that important. Who cares if you break Church's rules nowadays? And the Church will happily give out a dispensation if you ask for it. Back then, they often actually wouldn't let you (just look at Henry VIII and his attempts to get divorced – got flipped the bird by the pope, and he was a damn king). Just bad luck, sonny, pray away the incestous lust with some hail marys and find someone not related to you. If you didn't obey, you didn't get married, and that was a really big deal from both a social and legal perspective.
 

mondblut

Arcane
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
22,711
Location
Ingrija
Back then, they often actually wouldn't let you (just look at Henry VIII and his attempts to get divorced – got flipped the bird by the pope, and he was a damn king). Just bad luck, sonny, pray away the incestous lust with some hail marys and find someone not related to you. If you didn't obey, you didn't get married, and that was a really big deal from both a social and legal perspective.

Or flip the pope in return and startup your own church. Worked wonders for the Vatican, huh?
 

thesecret1

Arcane
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Messages
6,699
Or flip the pope in return and startup your own church. Worked wonders for the Vatican, huh?
Such is the way of the world. Still, the inbreeding meme is inaccurate, fueled by people thinking the aristocracy actually married close relatives. The idea that a royal found his offspring fucking and decided to join in is like something from a fetish fanfiction or something.
 

Agame

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
1,706
Location
I cum from a land down under
Insert Title Here
This shit should have come out today, to play over the weekend, now I'm forced to play this WL3 shit while I wait for Tuesday...
It probably won't be much to look at anyway on release.

Well if you really want to have fun check out the "influencer" coverage on YT, a bunch of retards larping. I guess some kind of Paradox promotion? I just about hurled my monitor out the window.
 

zaper

Yes.
Developer
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
404
And you paid full price for it?
Gamepass.

I often sound like a shill, but Gamepass for PC has a really good value, at least in my country. It's around $3 here IIRC, and you get tons of good games on release. We just got Wasteland 3 and now we'll be getting CK3.

As the owner of a PS4 who's been getting shitty games from PS PLUS month after month for a long time (and that has to deal with overpriced releases), Gamepass alone is what would make me buy an Xbox next-gen.
 

Hellion

Arcane
Joined
Feb 5, 2013
Messages
1,690
You can actually create world states in which everyone is gay.


SOXQ3bL.png



There's also a "gender equality" option with "Default", "Equal" or "Inverted" as choices.
 
Self-Ejected

MajorMace

Self-Ejected
Patron
Joined
May 6, 2018
Messages
2,008
Location
Souffrance, Franka
I still can't understand why anyone would want to play a medieval game but at the condition that it's all gay.

I can't wrap my head around that. Are we living the most absurd era of the time of man ? How ironic considering all the rational thinking and machinery at our disposal.
 
Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
19,562
And a link to the written Kotaku review.

TL;DR of the review using its own words: "I would recommend Crusader Kings III to Crusader Kings II fans, obviously. But also to Civilization and Total War fans. To people who play The Sims. Or visual novels. Or Bioware RPGS. That’s testament to how wild and untamed this game’s scope it, but also how successful it is in delivering on the promise of wrapping it all up into a single cohesive offering."
 
Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
19,562
And the Rock Paper Shotgun written review.

TL;DR - "I like it a lot. I think there are some awkwardnesses still to be ironed out, but they’re offset by a strong suite of new ideas. I saw what might have resolved into the edges of CK3’s potential a little earlier than I wanted to, in a game of such colossal scope. But I also saw a much stronger starting point for growth than CK2 represented in 2012. It’s less overwrought than its predecessor, and certainly less mentally draining to play. But this felt more like the result of smart design choices than oversimplification. Tonally, it’s in just the same, marvellously dark spot. All in all, and as boring as it is to say, I think Crusader Kings 3 is a lot like Crusader Kings 2, but newer and tidier. And I’m very content with that indeed."
 
Self-Ejected

MajorMace

Self-Ejected
Patron
Joined
May 6, 2018
Messages
2,008
Location
Souffrance, Franka
I also saw a much stronger starting point for growth than CK2 represented in 2012.
Yeah, my issue with paradox latest releases is that they still haven't delivered, starting with EU4.

Paradox games are the perfect illustration of why release-day-ponctual-reviews are pretty much obsolete too.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom