Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Diablo IV

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
14,048
I've played D4 up to level 20 and it is in no way shape or form anywhere near as shit as D3 up to that point. I can't comment on anything past that as frankly I found D3 so fucking shit that I lost all interest quite rapidly, but it is a HUGE improvement on that game in all the ways that are immediately obvious for the first 10 hours or whatever.

Graphics, atmosphere, story, presentation, music, sfx, etc, that kind of thing.

You're basically at the point right before the bottom falls out. By level 25 you've seen 99% of what the game has to offer. After level 25, how your character plays doesn't change whatsoever, end-game and all content after level 25 is just repeating what you've already seen over and over, etc. I could go on, but that's the gist of it.
 

Yosharian

Arcane
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
10,583
Location
Grand Chien
I've played D4 up to level 20 and it is in no way shape or form anywhere near as shit as D3 up to that point. I can't comment on anything past that as frankly I found D3 so fucking shit that I lost all interest quite rapidly, but it is a HUGE improvement on that game in all the ways that are immediately obvious for the first 10 hours or whatever.

Graphics, atmosphere, story, presentation, music, sfx, etc, that kind of thing.

You're basically at the point right before the bottom falls out. By level 25 you've seen 99% of what the game has to offer. After level 25, how your character plays doesn't change whatsoever, end-game and all content after level 25 is just repeating what you've already seen over and over, etc. I could go on, but that's the gist of it.
That's totally fair, I can't comment on the rest of the game.
 

KIss My Ass

Real name: SDG
Patron
Dumbfuck Shitposter
Joined
Feb 3, 2023
Messages
2,920
Location
Aya Cash's vagina I hope
Codex+ Now Streaming!
They literally invented an entire subgenre. And PoE copied them first.

View attachment 37753
'Blizzard North' did. 'Blizzard' is an entirely different studio that had no clue on how to create a Diablo game, which is why Diablo 3 was the piece of shit that it was.
This isn't the same Blizzard that made Diablo 3. I've gone over this.

Yeah, but that's the problem. The Blizzard that made Diablo 4 is even worse and less competent than the one that made D3.
You're a fucking dipshit. You clearly haven't played D4 and if you did and you truly believe 3 is better you are a terrible fucking person and you are a decline enabling asshole piece of shit. If that is the case you need to leave this hobby forever. Never voice your opinion again and swan dive into a ceptic tank used by hundreds of people. Your post has legit disgusted me.
 

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
14,048
They literally invented an entire subgenre. And PoE copied them first.

View attachment 37753
'Blizzard North' did. 'Blizzard' is an entirely different studio that had no clue on how to create a Diablo game, which is why Diablo 3 was the piece of shit that it was.
This isn't the same Blizzard that made Diablo 3. I've gone over this.

Yeah, but that's the problem. The Blizzard that made Diablo 4 is even worse and less competent than the one that made D3.
You're a fucking dipshit. You clearly haven't played D4 and if you did and you truly believe 3 is better you are a terrible fucking person and you are a decline enabling asshole piece of shit. If that is the case you need to leave this hobby forever. Never voice your opinion again and swan dive into a ceptic tank used by hundreds of people. Your post has legit disgusted me.

I'm sorry you're mentally disabled, but that's not my problem. Learn to differentiate game mechanics from pretty visuals. The inability to do so is ironically, far more decline than anything I could imagine. You're an actual console babby.
 

KIss My Ass

Real name: SDG
Patron
Dumbfuck Shitposter
Joined
Feb 3, 2023
Messages
2,920
Location
Aya Cash's vagina I hope
Codex+ Now Streaming!
They literally invented an entire subgenre. And PoE copied them first.

View attachment 37753
'Blizzard North' did. 'Blizzard' is an entirely different studio that had no clue on how to create a Diablo game, which is why Diablo 3 was the piece of shit that it was.
This isn't the same Blizzard that made Diablo 3. I've gone over this.

Yeah, but that's the problem. The Blizzard that made Diablo 4 is even worse and less competent than the one that made D3.
You're a fucking dipshit. You clearly haven't played D4 and if you did and you truly believe 3 is better you are a terrible fucking person and you are a decline enabling asshole piece of shit. If that is the case you need to leave this hobby forever. Never voice your opinion again and swan dive into a ceptic tank used by hundreds of people. Your post has legit disgusted me.

I'm sorry you're mentally disabled, but that's not my problem. Learn to differentiate game mechanics from pretty visuals. The inability to do so is ironically, far more decline than anything I could imagine. You're an actual console babby.
Selective reader. I've praised far more than the visuals. I've talked about the tone, the writing, the companions, the non-woke shit, the challenge, and on and on and on and on. There is not one single thing D3 does better than this game. Not one god damned thing. You either haven't played D4 or you really believe what you're saying and you need to be put in a nursing home.
 

KIss My Ass

Real name: SDG
Patron
Dumbfuck Shitposter
Joined
Feb 3, 2023
Messages
2,920
Location
Aya Cash's vagina I hope
Codex+ Now Streaming!
I've played D4 up to level 20 and it is in no way shape or form anywhere near as shit as D3 up to that point. I can't comment on anything past that as frankly I found D3 so fucking shit that I lost all interest quite rapidly, but it is a HUGE improvement on that game in all the ways that are immediately obvious for the first 10 hours or whatever.

Graphics, atmosphere, story, presentation, music, sfx, etc, that kind of thing.
Zeriel is clearly special. Let's take it easy on the poor thing.
 

ArchAngel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
21,591
They literally invented an entire subgenre. And PoE copied them first.

View attachment 37753
'Blizzard North' did. 'Blizzard' is an entirely different studio that had no clue on how to create a Diablo game, which is why Diablo 3 was the piece of shit that it was.
This isn't the same Blizzard that made Diablo 3. I've gone over this.

Yeah, but that's the problem. The Blizzard that made Diablo 4 is even worse and less competent than the one that made D3.
You're a fucking dipshit. You clearly haven't played D4 and if you did and you truly believe 3 is better you are a terrible fucking person and you are a decline enabling asshole piece of shit. If that is the case you need to leave this hobby forever. Never voice your opinion again and swan dive into a ceptic tank used by hundreds of people. Your post has legit disgusted me.

I'm sorry you're mentally disabled, but that's not my problem. Learn to differentiate game mechanics from pretty visuals. The inability to do so is ironically, far more decline than anything I could imagine. You're an actual console babby.
Selective reader. I've praised far more than the visuals. I've talked about the tone, the writing, the companions, the non-woke shit, the challenge, and on and on and on and on. There is not one single thing D3 does better than this game. Not one god damned thing. You either haven't played D4 or you really believe what you're saying and you need to be put in a nursing home.
Writing is similar shit. Instead of pathetic female Diablo we got a pathetic Lilith. Instead of Leah, we got this new insert girl. Instead of random stupid Cain death we get that random Duran (or whatever his name is) dude death. Instead of group of jerk angels he get one jerk Angel.
And quests are same shit of fetch shit and running around the map for no reason except to waste our time.
 

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
14,048
They literally invented an entire subgenre. And PoE copied them first.

View attachment 37753
'Blizzard North' did. 'Blizzard' is an entirely different studio that had no clue on how to create a Diablo game, which is why Diablo 3 was the piece of shit that it was.
This isn't the same Blizzard that made Diablo 3. I've gone over this.

Yeah, but that's the problem. The Blizzard that made Diablo 4 is even worse and less competent than the one that made D3.
You're a fucking dipshit. You clearly haven't played D4 and if you did and you truly believe 3 is better you are a terrible fucking person and you are a decline enabling asshole piece of shit. If that is the case you need to leave this hobby forever. Never voice your opinion again and swan dive into a ceptic tank used by hundreds of people. Your post has legit disgusted me.

I'm sorry you're mentally disabled, but that's not my problem. Learn to differentiate game mechanics from pretty visuals. The inability to do so is ironically, far more decline than anything I could imagine. You're an actual console babby.
Selective reader. I've praised far more than the visuals. I've talked about the tone, the writing, the companions, the non-woke shit, the challenge, and on and on and on and on. There is not one single thing D3 does better than this game. Not one god damned thing. You either haven't played D4 or you really believe what you're saying and you need to be put in a nursing home.

What non-woke shit? This game is more woke than D3, by a huge avalanche. (Not that that's surprising, D3 came out in 2012, which was when the woke mind disease was really starting to go mainstream, and most of the game was developed long before that.) Only thing I can think of in D3 that might stand out is Tyrael being a dindu. Meanwhile in this game literally every character you are supposed to relate to and the narrative treats with kid gloves is an ethnic. All whites are evil, or have to suffer nobly for their White Sickness. Any remotely religious character is treated as having an indelible sin for it, and vice versa, being a cannibal is fine as long as you are a lesbian asian.

I don't want to specifically criticize the story too much since that stuff is highly subjective, but I found it godawful. Almost every "big moment" hits with the impact of a deflating balloon. The only good parts are largely down to production value and take place in cinematics. Especially egregious is the misuse of characters from previous games. The lesser evils come and go so poorly that after instantly killing Andariel and Duriel you're left with the whiplash of, "Wait, that was them?" Random affix elites have a more memorable encounter than them.

Oh yeah, I guess we have to hand it to them for making the black priestess "evil". I suppose her goddamned evangelism overrode her black privilege. Come to think of it, maybe the staff just has tons of asians? The game does seem to have an absurdly high amount of female lesbian or asexual asians who all talk the same way.
 

Saravan

Savant
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
926
I've played D4 up to level 20 and it is in no way shape or form anywhere near as shit as D3 up to that point. I can't comment on anything past that as frankly I found D3 so fucking shit that I lost all interest quite rapidly, but it is a HUGE improvement on that game in all the ways that are immediately obvious for the first 10 hours or whatever.

Graphics, atmosphere, story, presentation, music, sfx, etc, that kind of thing.

You're basically at the point right before the bottom falls out. By level 25 you've seen 99% of what the game has to offer. After level 25, how your character plays doesn't change whatsoever, end-game and all content after level 25 is just repeating what you've already seen over and over, etc. I could go on, but that's the gist of it.
At around lvl 25-30 your build will effectively be the same for the rest of the game. Same skill rotation etc.

No diss at you Yosharian, but it's really telling when people keep saying it's an improvement over D3. It's such a meaningless comparison. Anything is better than D3.
 

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
14,048
I've played D4 up to level 20 and it is in no way shape or form anywhere near as shit as D3 up to that point. I can't comment on anything past that as frankly I found D3 so fucking shit that I lost all interest quite rapidly, but it is a HUGE improvement on that game in all the ways that are immediately obvious for the first 10 hours or whatever.

Graphics, atmosphere, story, presentation, music, sfx, etc, that kind of thing.

You're basically at the point right before the bottom falls out. By level 25 you've seen 99% of what the game has to offer. After level 25, how your character plays doesn't change whatsoever, end-game and all content after level 25 is just repeating what you've already seen over and over, etc. I could go on, but that's the gist of it.
At around lvl 25-30 your build will effectively be the same for the rest of the game. Same skill rotation etc.

No diss at you Yosharian, but it's really telling when people keep saying it's an improvement over D3. It's such a meaningless comparison. Anything is better than D3.

I disagree there, but I am apparently able to better separate the game mechanics of D3 from its "aesthetic presentation" or whatever you want to call what filtered most people.

D3's biggest issue was how it didn't "feel like Diablo" in terms of worldbuilding and aesthetics. The gameplay wasn't that bad. And it had way more end-game on launch than D4 has, better itemization, etc. The character builds were also way, way more varied, without even bringing items into the mix.

I get that it's always been tricky making that argument when you'd have idiots like gaudost on here insisting that no, everything about D3 is amazing! Even the butterfly Disney villain woman!

D3 had a good gameplay foundation that needed a better story & visual presentation. D4 bettered the visual presentation, but gutted the gameplay, end-game, mechanics, itemization, and just about everything else. On top of that, it actually has LESS worldbuilding than D3, in the incidental details that make up a singleplayer experience. For example: bestiaries, notes, Deckard Cain's voice overs as you're exploring, etc. None of that stuff exists in D4, the only thing that comes close is random journals in the game world that have no real worldbuilding, just disaster stories "woe is me I died", and are not recorded anywhere. The whole game has this very disposable feeling to it where you feel like an idiot if you're trying to make something out of it.
 

Saravan

Savant
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
926
I've played D4 up to level 20 and it is in no way shape or form anywhere near as shit as D3 up to that point. I can't comment on anything past that as frankly I found D3 so fucking shit that I lost all interest quite rapidly, but it is a HUGE improvement on that game in all the ways that are immediately obvious for the first 10 hours or whatever.

Graphics, atmosphere, story, presentation, music, sfx, etc, that kind of thing.

You're basically at the point right before the bottom falls out. By level 25 you've seen 99% of what the game has to offer. After level 25, how your character plays doesn't change whatsoever, end-game and all content after level 25 is just repeating what you've already seen over and over, etc. I could go on, but that's the gist of it.
At around lvl 25-30 your build will effectively be the same for the rest of the game. Same skill rotation etc.

No diss at you Yosharian, but it's really telling when people keep saying it's an improvement over D3. It's such a meaningless comparison. Anything is better than D3.

I disagree there, but I am apparently able to better separate the game mechanics of D3 from its "aesthetic presentation" or whatever you want to call what filtered most people.

D3's biggest issue was how it didn't "feel like Diablo" in terms of worldbuilding and aesthetics. The gameplay wasn't that bad. And it had way more end-game on launch than D4 has, better itemization, etc. The character builds were also way, way more varied, without even bringing items into the mix.

I get that it's always been tricky making that argument when you'd have idiots like gaudost on here insisting that no, everything about D3 is amazing! Even the butterfly Disney villain woman!
I understand what you mean but I guess we just don't appreciate the same types of mechanics. I found almost all changes D3 made were bad in terms of itemisation (which D4 clearly is copying here) and skill 'loadouts' destroying class identity and having to make some sort of commitment to your build. The latter D4 tried to move away from but the barebones customisation of the skill "tree" and budget PoE paragon board made a joke out of build diversity.
 

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
14,048
I've played D4 up to level 20 and it is in no way shape or form anywhere near as shit as D3 up to that point. I can't comment on anything past that as frankly I found D3 so fucking shit that I lost all interest quite rapidly, but it is a HUGE improvement on that game in all the ways that are immediately obvious for the first 10 hours or whatever.

Graphics, atmosphere, story, presentation, music, sfx, etc, that kind of thing.

You're basically at the point right before the bottom falls out. By level 25 you've seen 99% of what the game has to offer. After level 25, how your character plays doesn't change whatsoever, end-game and all content after level 25 is just repeating what you've already seen over and over, etc. I could go on, but that's the gist of it.
At around lvl 25-30 your build will effectively be the same for the rest of the game. Same skill rotation etc.

No diss at you Yosharian, but it's really telling when people keep saying it's an improvement over D3. It's such a meaningless comparison. Anything is better than D3.

I disagree there, but I am apparently able to better separate the game mechanics of D3 from its "aesthetic presentation" or whatever you want to call what filtered most people.

D3's biggest issue was how it didn't "feel like Diablo" in terms of worldbuilding and aesthetics. The gameplay wasn't that bad. And it had way more end-game on launch than D4 has, better itemization, etc. The character builds were also way, way more varied, without even bringing items into the mix.

I get that it's always been tricky making that argument when you'd have idiots like gaudost on here insisting that no, everything about D3 is amazing! Even the butterfly Disney villain woman!
I understand what you mean but I guess we just don't appreciate the same types of mechanics. I found almost all changes D3 made were bad in terms of itemisation (which D4 clearly is copying here) and skill 'loadouts' destroying class identity and having to make some sort of commitment to your build. The latter D4 tried to move away from but the barebones customisation of the skill "tree" and budget PoE paragon board made a joke out of build diversity.

I actually agree on that point compared to D2. But as its own thing, it was fine. And D4 does not bring back D2 or Path of Exile or Grim Dawn style builds, it just removes the build variety of runes/loadouts. I always said as far back as D3 beta/release that they should have kept the original design for runes, which would have been largely the same mechanics wise as runes were in D3, but they'd have to drop, and the best version of a rune would be an ultra-rare drop. That would have fed the item game into it, instead of making it feel like completely disposable loadouts.


I also don't think it's true they were genuinely trying to return to D2 with the D4 skilltree. I agree that's how it was marketed, but like almost everything said about D4 before release, it was intentionally misleading. You can respec your entire skilltree in D4 on a whim, it is not expensive at all. The only thing added compared to loadouts is tedium, since you can't "save" a setup.

I'm not someone who cares too much about form, though. My issue with D4 is that there are no good options. If they threw rune effects into legendaries (something they implied would be the case before release), or it was in the paragon board, or ANYWHERE, I would forgive them, but nope. They just don't exist. A single rune on a single skill in D3 adds more variety to a skill than your entire skill tree & legendary slots in D4. For example, Monk's Fist of Thunder. Teleports you to the target, chains lightning, and knocks up enemies. There are entire classes in D4 that never get anything this good, or this dramatic of a change, stacking every single skill and legendary they have. That really shows you how boring and bland the skill tree & paragon boards in D4 are, on top of legendaries. On the class I'm playing, I've seen a total of ONE aspect that is remotely as interesting as D3 legendaries. That's out of a list of dozens. Most of them are minor stat boosts or conditional buffs, not major changes to how skills work.
 

abija

Prophet
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
3,362
Fixed that for you. Having played it quite a bit and still playing it (I know I know, I'm the retard here for doing that), it is markedly worse than D3, and more than that, worse than every other Diablo title. It's actually impressive how bad it is mechanically. The only thing it has going for it is visual production values.
Give some examples maybe? Mechanics wise, maybe I think of something else.
If you mean along the lines of: "A single rune on a single skill in D3 adds more variety to a skill than your entire skill tree & legendary", totally. That is one of the things that made me think of grim dawn, how the supposed skill "choice" changes it more how it can fit in a build not how it actually behaves. A lot of "math" changes, few gameplay ones.
 
Last edited:

Joyvankek

Learned
Joined
Dec 4, 2021
Messages
296
They literally invented an entire subgenre. And PoE copied them first.

View attachment 37753
'Blizzard North' did. 'Blizzard' is an entirely different studio that had no clue on how to create a Diablo game, which is why Diablo 3 was the piece of shit that it was.
This isn't the same Blizzard that made Diablo 3. I've gone over this.

Yeah, but that's the problem. The Blizzard that made Diablo 4 is even worse and less competent than the one that made D3.
You're a fucking dipshit. You clearly haven't played D4 and if you did and you truly believe 3 is better you are a terrible fucking person and you are a decline enabling asshole piece of shit. If that is the case you need to leave this hobby forever. Never voice your opinion again and swan dive into a ceptic tank used by hundreds of people. Your post has legit disgusted me.
I liked diablo 1 for it's atmosphere.
Fighting some bosses when you had all these naked bodies, often in pieces, all around was quite something.
Diablo 2 was less atmospheric but it still held my interest enough to play to the end with two classes. Necro was very fun to play.
Diablo 3 I completed once, uninstalled and never looked back.
It's gameplay was bland, there was nothing reassembling the feel of fighting with hellish abominations like in diablo 1. It was shit. And I still regret wasting my money on it.
With Diablo 4 I didn't even bother, if the fact that it's modern day ActiBlizzard that release it, the whole ad campaign of it, feel like getting hit by big red CCCP flag by a fat landwhale that happens to have red hair and was hired as diversity commissar.

Im surprised that anyone from codex even bothered to buy it. Then again, if there is a place you can look for masochists, it's Codex.
 

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
14,048
Fixed that for you. Having played it quite a bit and still playing it (I know I know, I'm the retard here for doing that), it is markedly worse than D3, and more than that, worse than every other Diablo title. It's actually impressive how bad it is mechanically. The only thing it has going for it is visual production values.
Give some examples maybe? Mechanics wise, maybe I think of something else.
If you mean along the lines of: "A single rune on a single skill in D3 adds more variety to a skill than your entire skill tree & legendary", totally. That is one of the things that made me think of grim dawn, how the supposed skill "choice" changes it more how it can fit in a build not how it actually behaves. A lot of "math" changes, few gameplay ones.

Yes, that's exactly it. It's all math changes. Low effort stuff. Which I imagine is very much the point; they probably threw this thing together in a hurry to get a financial return in a quarter at the behest of suits. Every class basically has one major synergy that is baked into the tree and doesn't come from anything except the inherent skill tree. Itemization and progress past level 25 doesn't actually add anything new of this sort, it only increases the numbers on which those synergies operate. And since level scaling is in effect until level 95, your numbers are always going down relative to the mobs when you level up, so it is only if you are upgrading all of your gear constantly AND your paragon glyphs/boards effectively that you will see your strength increasing (very very slightly) relative to the enemies.

That's kind of besides the point though, since the game is very casual/easy in general. There isn't really difficult encounters, only content you can do early that you are mathematically not ready for yet (for example, doing a level 69 enemy nightmare dungeon at level 50).

I'd have to sit down and really think through the consequences of all this to dissect all the mechanical problems with the game. If people want me to do that, I'll write up a novel of a post, comparing it to D3 and D2 and D1. Otherwise I think it's simple enough to say that the game is very hollow and plays like a mobile game. (Ironically, I've heard people say Diablo Immortal is a more interesting game. Since I haven't played it, I can't comment.)
 

abija

Prophet
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
3,362
There are more synergies that come into effect later due to math and some variations of pick best performing skills fuck synergies, but yeah still math. Some skills are very well done though so the skill variety is even more saddening.
 

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
14,048
There are more synergies that come into effect later due to math and some variations of pick best performing skills fuck synergies, but yeah still math. Some skills are very well done though so the skill variety is even more saddening.

When I say synergies I mean emergent qualities that are not just "more damage". For example, the way all the shadow related skills of the rogue fit together to turn them into an aoe machine that explodes all over the place. That's all baked into the skill tree, and is the only build like that for the rogue, and no amount of legendaries or items really changes how it works or adds that level of synergy to other builds, the stuff you get after level 25 just increase the numbers.

Another example but far lesser would be the legendary that removes the cooldown on poison traps when you enter stealth. Most legendaries should be like that and were advertised as like that when they started development, but in actuality there are only like 1-2 things like that per class.
 

Saravan

Savant
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
926
As an example, what is the fucking point of having dual wield swords or axes in the game. The only possible synergy you got is dual wield maces for a barb and even then it's subpar to just spamming WW or HOTA. What is the point of shields in the game?
 

abija

Prophet
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
3,362
Another example but far lesser would be the legendary that removes the cooldown on poison traps when you enter stealth. Most legendaries should be like that and were advertised as like that when they started development, but in actuality there are only like 1-2 things like that per class.

That's also limited. Should be more like that and as broad as possible.
There's an apparent fear of imbalance which just isn't good for these types of games.

As an example, what is the fucking point of having dual wield swords or axes in the game. The only possible synergy you got is dual wield maces for a barb and even then it's subpar to just spamming WW or HOTA. What is the point of shields in the game?
What's the point of randomly limiting the type of 1h weapons?
And the point of shields in the game is to block dmg... ???
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom