No.Don't DMCV have connect assit?
No.Don't DMCV have connect assit?
Yeah we've all more or less interpreted it as 'the same dragon's dogma as if it had more of a budget the first time around'. I also don't think people ITT or elsewhere really cares. We'd rather hope for a more refined experience rather than wonder what if this was a tech upgrade and so on. It's less of a re-make or a traditional sequel-upgrade and more of a re-take."Dragon's Dogma verbatim, looks the same, with more content".
Yeah we've all more or less interpreted it as 'the same dragon's dogma as if it had more of a budget the first time around'. I also don't think people ITT or elsewhere really cares. We'd rather hope for a more refined experience rather than wonder what if this was a tech upgrade and so on. It's less of a re-make or a traditional sequel-upgrade and more of a re-take."Dragon's Dogma verbatim, looks the same, with more content".
i'd add that the mismanagement is that this is like DD3. DD2 was actually DDO, the game japan refused to export.Yeah we've all more or less interpreted it as 'the same dragon's dogma as if it had more of a budget the first time around'. I also don't think people ITT or elsewhere really cares. We'd rather hope for a more refined experience rather than wonder what if this was a tech upgrade and so on. It's less of a re-make or a traditional sequel-upgrade and more of a re-take."Dragon's Dogma verbatim, looks the same, with more content".
I don't mind more DD 1, it just seems like a huge degree of mismanagement to miss their window of when a sequel that looked practically the same would have had maximum impact. It's like if DOS2 came out 10 years after DOS1.
The answer has been almost unanimously in approval of it being the exact same game than the first one, because the first one is already pretty unique.Yeah we've all more or less interpreted it as 'the same dragon's dogma as if it had more of a budget the first time around'. I also don't think people ITT or elsewhere really cares. We'd rather hope for a more refined experience rather than wonder what if this was a tech upgrade and so on. It's less of a re-make or a traditional sequel-upgrade and more of a re-take."Dragon's Dogma verbatim, looks the same, with more content".
Fuck off BarryMore content, simplified systems and modern Zeitgeist.
I think they're making the game that they wanted to make in the original.I've been thinking this since the first screenshots but held back on commenting since it feels needlessly negative but... doesn't this whole thing reek of being a major mod/minor expansion? The engine and models look virtually identical. A 4x bigger world sounds nice, and the presentation and writing is certainly a splash of clean water after the garbage we're being fed elsewhere, but it still seems like a huge wasted opportunity to me that they're only cashing in on because everyone kept demanding a sequel. This really should have come out like... 8 years ago, if it was going to just be "Dragon's Dogma verbatim, looks the same, with more content".
I don't know what you talking about :^)Dishonoredbr am I missing something, or did you post those vids in the wrong thread?
Equipment System
unlikely tbh. none of this reads like a wip, and if they decided to unify slots into torso/legs then thats a lot of work baked into the assets. its not just a sure thing, i think its unlikely to revert at this point.I hope the lack of equipment slots is just for the demo, otherwise big decline.
Looks cool but why couldn't they have L1 and R1 both be separate shortcuts for different assigned skills on the face buttons? That way you could have 8 active skills that are mapped. Eh maybe someone can mod that.
Dedicated heal/stamina potion button =
Equipment System
I hope the lack of equipment slots is just for the demo, otherwise big decline.