Fenix
Arcane
How good is this game compared to Atom RPG?
Half of it is on pair or better - other not exist yet.
How good is this game compared to Atom RPG?
It could be worthwhile. Like a lot of RPGs Encased is harder at the start, so some extra skill points and more HP from having an extra level could make make the difference, and being a bit behind in the mid and end game might not be a big deal.I understand, thanks. Though the PC is going to have the better skills right-away from the start, possibly also gaining more experiences, items etc. for it. It still seems an interesting and a better trade-off, doesn't it?The XP to reach the next level increases gradually, so if you take a "free" level early every level after that will take longer.Thinking about a scientific PC, is there any reason not to choose Slacker perk with high (10) brains? It seems like a steal-deal. 16 points per level instead of 19 but two perks at the first level. E.g. taking an instant leveling at the 1st level as a perk, one gets 16 more points to redistribute thus overcoming the disadvantage of the Slacker for five levels to come at least!
How good is this game compared to Atom RPG? I am wondering if I want to play it.
You can't do that because it's a prelude that sets the story. The rest of the story must be much longer.would love to see an expansion of the pre-maelstrom time period, along with fixing up the 2nd half locations and combat balancing.
You can't do that because it's a prelude that sets the story. The rest of the story must be much longer.would love to see an expansion of the pre-maelstrom time period, along with fixing up the 2nd half locations and combat balancing.
CS as in Colony Ship?Nothing much will compare to CS once it releases. It already blows most crpgs out of the water from just a EA title, so theres that.
Underrail: Infusion is another title you should definitely be hyped for.
BG3? eh. Encased does seem to be a fun playthrough. I am still waiting to start. Perhaps a few months down the line for patches.. not decided yet.
overall story/writing in 2nd half? Is it good, considering? or does the quality also drop there considerably?
overall story/writing in 2nd half? Is it good, considering? or does the quality also drop there considerably?
You have to get all factions to work with you. You can do their chores or skip them with right skills.
Crazy raiders are crazy and you have to fight in an arena, democratic settlement has democratic problems so you fix them democratically, authoritarian guy is authoritarian and wants to take over democratic settlement, evil church is evil.
Plot with Maelstrom/ Dome stays strong until the end, but the faction stuff is eh.
Hold your horses there, pardner. Spamming Barcelona with historical figures, while a valid charge, did not take away from the experience (for a ten year old me) and the strength of the atmosphere people praise the game for lies in it's setting - mass execution of Saracen prisoners at the siege of Jaffa inadvertently completes an ancient ritual and unleashes magic upon the world. Galileeans and desert-dwellers join forces to turn the tide of demonspawn. Few hundred years later, player is thrust into the world where Mongols are goblins, dangerous magical creatures roam the wilderness, Inquisition hunts practitioners of magic and Spain is on the verge of launching a massive invasion of druidic England, intrigues, mysterious factions, unknown magical dimensions - all this lays groundwork for a setting far more unique and interesting than n-th iteration of post-apo bullshit. And I just opened Lionheart's soundtrack and it is objectively better than bland Encased.Ahhh yes, the Much Better Atmosphere(TM) of Lionheart, wherein the first few maps you find DaVince and Shakespear are neighbors, one map away from that old buddy-comedy duo of Cervantes and Machiavelli.Lionheart had much better atmosphere and music
Lionheart is to cRPGs what The Avengers are to cinema; pablum without rhyme or reason, created from business need rather than creative spark.
It pisses me off to see it praised here given this forum's history, because back on the BIS forums everyone and their dog was shitting all over it and the developers for dumbing down the implementation of Fallout's mechanics. That's right, Fallout - a game not known for deep or complex mechanics. Lionheart was proto-decline, along with Brotherhood of Steel and Dark Alliance.
It's a trash-tier grab-bag of historical figures thrown together for the fedora-wearing crowd to feel sophisticated while they splash around in the puddle that they reduced Fallout's mechanics to.
I am saying Lionheart is a good game. It's ridiculously awsome. Not saying it's on par with the early Fallouts (to which the comparison sways the notion), it's awsome in it's own strange, whacky and naive way.Nobody's saying Lionheart is a good game - it isn't. But the setting continues to intrigue me to this day and is infinitely more compelling than an uninspired, derivative mix of Fallout and STALKER. That's precisely where the superiority of Lionheart over Encased lies, because gameplay of neither could be called enjoyable.
FYI, it isn't quite like that.This game is possibly the most non-woke RPG I have seen in recent years. In particular, I think that the depiction of this gay is like as a joke. It is surprising to see something like this in the cultural climate of 2021, although it is probably historically accurate for a game set in the '70s. Let's be real, the game has different issues, but wokeness is not one of them.
Here's the ftm companion whose pronouns you must respect.
I don't care (the fact that this thing falls apart into an amateurish empty mess in its final areas is a much bigger issue) but there's no need to be deceptive or selective about what it is.
Spamming Barcelona with historical figures, while a valid charge, did not take away from the experience (for a ten year old me) and the strength of the atmosphere people praise the game for lies in it's setting
They're simply not. Encased is the embodiment of "wide as an ocean, deep as a puddle" while CS is basically the opposite. TG is another case, I'll write my impressions later but it's much closer to Encased in that comparison.Pretty much on the same level as encased and atom. Don't be a tryhard shitlord.CS is head and shoulders above this or ATOM TG already so don't worry.Do I seriously have to wait for CS to release to play a good RPG? I wait for releases for years and, one after another, they keep turning out to be shit. The itemization is fucking horrid, running from container to container, finding miniscule amounts of worthless junk is incredibly frustrating and detracts from what could otherwise be moderately enjoyable, whoever thought it would be fun to have every insignificant scrub be named because, I dunno, it would make it easier to navigate massive maps and find actually entertaining content should be strung up, combat is easy as shit, intriguing set up for a story fizzles out into menial fetch quests.
If CS doesn't deliver then I'm officially done with RPG:s.
Also you don't seem to care about mechanics and difficulty in RPGs so I guess they're on the same level to you. To me, Encased and TG are so piss easy to the point it's not clear why even bother with all that combat elements. While CS is a proper RPG where you have to pay attention in order to play, to PLAY it, to play with its mechanics.
Let's see...Sooo fags,what is your argument for fallout being better? Outside of retarded nostalgia.
- lack of retarded survival system no one has asked for
- a charismatic villain and two decent (by local standarts) end-game dungeons vs no boss and tiny pathetic dungeon
- a decent loot system vs Encased's insanity
- consistency, a clear vision behind it
The same people who got the billboards with libtard slogans in it about equality wrote that thing, so, I dunno what is going on with those ruskies.