Heroic Liberator
Arcane
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2018
- Messages
- 19,826
Doesn't apply either way. Unless you are willing to fully deny the existence of free will in other people (and thus treat them as mindless meatbags), then that 15% off can be compensated through one's character. To take the particular case of a heightened fight or flight response, the greater your innate fear - the greater the courage you must cultivate.I prefer cutting 15% of his heart out as comparison.if i cut your feet i'm cutting 15% of your ability to move but actually i'm cutting your ability to walk by 100%.If you are saying that your ability to deal with emotions is ~15% reduced, big fucking deal.
You can argue the opposite and that's fine by me as well, but you should be also willing to accept its logical conclusions then. If dealing with fear is also a product of genetics and thus whether one is a coward or not is solely genetic as well given a normal fight or flight response, then you should disregard the self-agency of others. There is no virtue in being brave, honorable, compassionate or what have you if all of these precede one's will.
Arguing for genetic predispositions is one thing, arguing for genetic determinism another.