Sorry to be a pain, but if you can't be bothered reading five posts that I directly linked to that clearly point out and articulate the reasons why your girlfriend was banned (I even use nice clear dot points for you retards), then you aren't really worth discussing this with.
We've been over this five times in this thread already. I really need to make it a sixth? Why, can't you read? And if you can't be bothered reading those, where's my guarantee you'll even be bothered reading it if I post the same thing again? Because that's all I'd be doing.
Perhaps you'd like me to draw you a chart?
All I was asking was for a clear and concise list of grievances condensed on a single post so we ca discuss them better. I thought this would be easier for you to do than me, given I imagine you have them at the forefront of your brain, while I would need to dig them through 5 posts plus their context.
If that is not the case, or if you consider even this to be too much effort, I can understand it, but there is no need to be derisive or unpolite. I will gladly go through the posts myself, however I will only have time for that on the weekend.
Refer rules, shit poster. If that's not clear enough for you, then too bad. He knows what behaviour he should be trying to avoid. I listed it very, very clearly. This is the fourth period we've been over this with. First it was with KnightRider and then he promised to be good. Then it was Schattenjager. Then it was FretRider.
"Shitposting" seems like a bad reason to ban anyone. At least if we are to remain a diverse community. We have people with very different views of the world, and most of them find any view different of their own "shit". Therefore, if shitposting is in the rules as a bannable offense, I would say we should either overturn the rule or at the very least make it clear and reduce the associated penalty.
Take, for example, Roguey. I actually consider a lot of what he (or she, whatever) posted to be "shitposts", in that he brings up concerns that have little to nothing to do with game making (such as feminism, or fat shaming, or whatever), or that they come from a design position so different from my own that there is little to discuss.
That doesn't mean I want him to be banned. In fact, I understand his recent review of IWD, at least according to Grunker, is pretty decent. I haven't read it yet (I am a bit pressed for time this week), but my point is that he contributed to the site because he has a different point of view. In fact, who knows, I might be able to understand something I didn't before and maybe even appreciate more the games he like for that.
Every single account was given a chance, and every single account was eventually banned. FretRider doesn't deserve a fifth chance. He's proven that he doesn't deserve to be here.
How many times do you retarded monkeys need to be told something? Do hard-core conservative brains not work correctly? Why are you so confused about this? Or is this just a Brazilian thing?
I believe I have managed to not offend a single person in this forum. I guess I might have annoyed some with my sense of humor, or with my persistence. And I remember once even coming off as "false" when I was discussing with Volourn. But I don't think I've ever called someone names or implied bad things by what I was saying. I would appreciate if you could return the favor.
Furthermore, as an aside, I am not sure why you think I am a conservative. I am, if that is what set you off, religious, but that doesn't mean I align myself politically with the right. I do also think that "liberal" policies frequently try to change things without giving enough thought as to why things were done the way they were. But I agree mostly with anarchist political movements, though I do think distributivism might be a good idea.
Of the amount of chances being given, I believe people always deserve a second chance, though this is my personal view on forgiveness. I do think, however, that some kind of proof of good will or punishment might be in order, I just don't think baning should be it, nor anything degrading...
If Bryce has dementia and can't remember more than three seconds ago, that's not my problem. I even linked to warnings made against his posts. So you can stop with the pretend "oh, he's just an innocent victim" bullshit.(...)
In fact, this is why I posted my request in first place, so we can go over what Fretrider's grievances are and come to terms as to what kind of terms should be set up for him to return. I don't want to argue he is innocent, although I would like to know what exactly he is guilty of. I would only argue he is innocent if all the grievances were things I don't agree with being rules in first place, such as shit posting.
He was warned, clearly and specifically. He's a shit-poster. He posts nothing but shit. And he spams the same shit again and again and again. Spammers die.
Now read his last few posts (if you poor Brazilian brain can handle that). Note how it's just the same message again and again and again. "Trash. Trash vs Sheek. DU is butthurt. Trash. Why was I banned? Nobody wanted me banned." Notice how he doesn't even bother addressing any points?
Good, at least we have an actual grievance. I agree that spamming messages without even paying attention to what the other people are saying is a problem. It makes the forum hard to read for everyone else and goes nowhere (I hope people won't find me guilty of doing the same thing last time I was arguing with Draq, though). And I even agree to certain point that FretRider may be guilty of it, in that I've seen a few of his posts where he seemed to have just skimmed the other people's points, or ignored them. I am not convinced, however, that he did this out of bad faith. Still, now we have this point, we can try to come up with an appropriate "punishment" for that.
Those five posts I linked to explain every single point he raised more than adequately, even using his own points to dismiss them. And now I've got another retarded Brazilian monkey here who finds it too hard to read because gosh, it's lots. Yeah. We've talked about this a lot. How many more times will we need to talk about it before you idiots get the message?
Again, no need for insults. Other than that, what I said before is still valid, I just asked for you to do it because I imagined it would be easier for you than to me. Throughout this whole thread, people have kept heckling on, commenting and making fun of the situation. My hope is to start a calm conversation so we can properlydiscuss what is the problem here and how we should go about solving.
Bryce doesn't learn. The first thing he does is come back, and send me a PM telling me how much of a shit I am and how butthurt I must be but oh, can I unban him now? By the way did I know he still thinks Trash is still a miserable shit-cock? Then he MASS MESSAGES everyone he can (so much that he actually triggered some warning messages in XenForo) with the exact same bullshit he tried before. "Oh, I'm a changed man, I know that now - by the way Trash, shitcock, butthurt unban me plz".
I don't think he argued he was changed. I think part of the problem here is that he doesn't agree with your view of him, that he is in the right on all these instances. He did agree to tone down the name calling a bit, though. It is my hope that by discussing this calmly, we can all agree on a core set of what his bad behavior was and try to agree how we can go about changing that.
So if you're serious, you can take the time and read those posts I link to. If you have some issue about anything in them, or another point you'd like to raise, then by all means do so. But "Trash", "Trash vs Sheek", "some people like me!" have all been addressed, are all old news and have all been dealt with. We had our reasons for banning him the first umpteen times, if you can't be bothered finding out what they are, why should I bother even listening to you?
Fair enough. Also, let me thank you for not using ad hominems here...
I'm not going to waste my time with retarded idiots who don't even bother to actually read up on the person they're supposedly trying to help.
Oh well, I guess it was too good to be true.
Alex you are retardedly obnoxious here. It's one thing that you wouldn't even ban spammers and IRL stalkers, it's another to keep asking why when you have huge walls of text explaining it throughout this thread. We get that you got a chip on your shoulder already. Fuck off or start your own forum if you can't even bear the banning of one poster who was obviously here to troll.
Jesus Christ.
The huge walls of text are part of the problem, actually. And sorry if I am being annoying, but I like this place, and I want to help it be the best it can. Our views on what best is can vary, though. For example, I think a big problem here is the lack of respect people have for each other. I don't mean people should be polite all the time, or even at any time, as this was never the case around here. But even if people were rude, they at least respected enough each other to argue things, and this is disappearing. Heck, I am guilty of that myself, why, I have skipped several posts around simply because I expect people to be repeating the same things over and over.
I don't know how to best solve this problem. But I do believe that banning people left and right will make it worse, not better.
Alex is one of the most polite and constructive posters on RPG Codex, while you are unable to maintain civility over a minor disagreement. It seems that you are the one with a chip on a shoulder.
When you keep politely asking for the same thing over and over, eventually it just stops being polite.
I do believe this is the first time I asked for a list of grievances, although a strong memory was never a quality of mine. Still, I think you are talking about Fret's return, which is a fair enough complaint. But I am under the impression this is actually something on the table here, which is why I asked for the list in first place.
Alex is one of the most polite and constructive posters on RPG Codex, while you are unable to maintain civility over a minor disagreement. It seems that you are the one with a chip on a shoulder.
When you keep politely asking for the same thing over and over, eventually it just stops being polite.
Yeah, and because of that DU is going hardcore on brazilians.
My
![Diagnosis: Butthurt :butthurt: :butthurt:](/forums/smiles/butthurt.png)
is going astronomical here.
EDIT: And dnf doesn't help either.
Well, sorry, but if DU is going to judge nationalities instead of people, that is his problem, not mine.
Firstly, Alex' insistance is less polite and more like the incessant persistence of a child that doesn't listen to the reply of others. Alex just keeps repeating the same sentence over and over.
I think (feel free to correct me) that you are referring to my previous comments where I have shown support for a less "ban happy" approach to moderation. I did indeed make some posts that went nowhere, and I a sorry if those were annoying to read. I do feel that some of my posts touched issues that are worth discussing, such as what is the best policy for the Codex, how can we keep its free spirit and so on. I imagine those can be annoying to read too, as they took a long time to get where they were going. I am sorry for that too, but the reason it started so is because I had no idea where I was going before I started posting. In fact, this is one of the reasons I like posting here, because discussion may make you realize points about your own position you didn't realize in first place.
Secondly, his "politeness" only proves that civility and retardation can go hand in hand without problems.
If you think politeness is so important, RPG Watch is a fine site for you. Which incidentally is the last place where somebody attacked my "tone" instead of my argument because they didn't want to participate in the actual substance of the discussion.
Alex is a bro in most contexts, and we cooperated very well on the P&P interviews the Codex did. But I'm not a big enough faggot to not call someone out on their retardation just because we respect each other in some other context. I'm not the WCDS holding hands with my "allies" - I'm not brown-nosing. My opinion is that Alex is retarded in this instance, and thus I voice it.
This is one example of what I think is the problem with lack of respect. No, I don't actually mind you at all calling me a retard. What I do think is that you didn't even consider my position at all.