eremita
Savant
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2013
- Messages
- 797
I was reffering to your bullshit statement, not Requiem difficulty.Which one does Requiem difficulty science fall into?That post is about theoretical models/paradigms (Newton's theory/Einstein's theory), not about scientific facts as a whole - it's out of context... Applied chemistry, biochemistry, neuroscience, physics etc. provides reliable scientific FACTS. Actually, those are the closest thing to the objective facts.o_OIts a scientific fact that there are no scientific facts.It is a scientific fact that you need to git gud before you can have legitimate input about Requiem's difficulty.
Also, that guy is religious and that's enough for me.
Plus it doesnt change the fact that those "facts" could very well be wrong or inaccurate, as they often are, and well see someone debunk them or correct them. The truth is we dont know everything about anything, so claiming something is a fact is most likely a lie.
And before you go there the scientific method is a good idea, but has turned the scientific community into circle jerking idiots or mean spirited fucktards, they so closely resemble this site and its crowd that its scary. Also, its relies upon previous knowledge that could be proven mistaken down the line, so far from perfect.
PS: Judging someone for their beliefs of something neither them nor you can understand, mediocre fuck.
Again, that's out of context and fucking biased. We were talking about facts, not about "knowing everything about anything". I don't need to know everything about brain physiology + function (nobody does, I admit that) to be sure that brain wiring is plastic. That was PROVEN with scientific method, so it's a FACT. I don't need to know everything about biochemistry to be sure that human body can't synthesize vitamin C. Also, real scientist is aware of what kind of proof is he offering; simple example: he's not gonna say that conclusion about all swans being white is absolute, because we can't be sure that there are no black swans somewhere... But the fact that humans can't survive without oxygen (not just the demonstration, but also the why of it) is different. That fact is absolute - it is proven.
PS: Something? What Something? The notion of God is empty. You mean Yahweh or Jesus Christ? As far as I'm concerned he could believe in chaos gods I don't give a shit... As long as people are aware that's actually all that this is - belief. But religion connects belief with conviction and confidence and that's fucked up... Oh sure, I can't understand it because God in Christianity by its very definition transcendents human reasoning. Well, it's ok then... I guess... BTW, I think christianity is pretty cool moral conception. And that's about it...
PPS: It's ironic when someone with your attitude talks about "mean spirited fucktards"... You're a hypocrite.
Last edited: