- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 99,411
Maybe this?Still 0 news about InXile Arcanum project? Is it real, though? Sounds like gossip to me.
Arcanum without Cain,Anderson and Boyarsky?Fuck no. That was their game.Still 0 news about InXile Arcanum project? Is it real, though? Sounds like gossip to me.
Arcanum without Cain,Anderson and Boyarsky?Fuck no. That was their game.Still 0 news about InXile Arcanum project? Is it real, though? Sounds like gossip to me.
Fargo should borrow Cain + Boyarsky from Obsidian because they are all under Microsoft and are wasting the few years they have left with making mediocre games like Outer Worlds.About time they give us finished version of Arcanum untill they get too old and senile. God knows where Anderson is but i don't think he would say no at the chance to reunite with his buddies. They could also throw Avellone a bone and he could write under an alias if they don't have the guts to make it public.
Implying Fargo didn't sell his ass to M$.Fargo should borrow Cain + Boyarsky from Obsidian because they are all under Microsoft and are wasting the few years they have left with making mediocre games like Outer Worlds.
It had okay combat, but there was no story, no engagement. If the game was a guy, I'd say the guy was a burnout and an empty shell of a man who comes back 30 years later to repeat a feat he doesn't feel like repeating, gives it a half hearted attempt and fails because he's not the man he used to be, and doesn't have it in him to give another performance. In fact he's exhausted and has nothing to give at all.Wasteland 2 was solid.
If W3 is crap then W2 is even bigger crap. At least W3 offers more coherent experience (also, more <> better) and in terms of presentation it's vastly superior.Wasteland 2 was solid. They haven't made anything good since. Wasteland 3 is crap.
That's true, in W2 different areas had completely different design philosophies to the point where it felt like the designers never bothered to communicate with each other.At least W3 offers more coherent experience
If W3 is crap then W2 is even bigger crap. At least W3 offers more coherent experience (also, more <> better) and in terms of presentation it's vastly superior.Wasteland 2 was solid. They haven't made anything good since. Wasteland 3 is crap.
Why would that reason ever be a problem? People used to start BG1 & 2, and Icewind Dale 1 & 2 multiplayer games just to have full party creation for themselves; despite losing out on the prepared interactions of the pre-made party characters. I myself would make at least four PCs (in the Infinity engine games)—losing out on some of the friendships, and personality clashes between the many possible party member combinations, because custom PCs are silent aside from command barks.w2 & 3 suck because of full party creation
not my fault those people are retardedWhy would that reason ever be a problem? People used to start BG1 & 2, and Icewind Dale 1 & 2 multiplayer games—just to have full party creation for themselves; despite losing out on the prepared interactions of the pre-made party characters.w2 & 3 suck because of full party creation
The D&D Red Box set shipped with a solo D&D adventure.same people probably play D&D by themselves...
It's not autistic to want the story without the hassles that come with it....because they're autistic
If W3 is crap then W2 is even bigger crap. At least W3 offers more coherent experience (also, more <> better) and in terms of presentation it's vastly superior.Wasteland 2 was solid. They haven't made anything good since. Wasteland 3 is crap.
Unfortunately the release version was unfinished, unbalanced and hilariously buggy and most people never went back and gave it another chance with the remaster. Too bad.
Well what does? About the only other RPG that does is Planescape. I never expected Wasteland 2 to match those.None of the interactions matter because you're just a group of faceless rangers. No shit it's worse than fallout and will never measure up to it.