tritosine2k
Erudite
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2010
- Messages
- 1,823
yeah so it goes, they just pulled some kinda pseudo (cardboard) depth out of the wizard hat
"infers the depth of an input image", lmao
This is just a 3d artist's shortcut using depth maps. This has nothing to do with AI. He does it in Photoshop and then puts it all together in a 3d program.yeah so it goes, they just pulled some kinda pseudo (cardboard) depth out of the wizard hat
And? It just draws a depth map, dude."infers the depth of an input image", lmao
Then it adds that to its denoising calculations in order to keep the basic shape of the image. That's it.So how do we generate a depth map? Well, Stable Diffusion uses MiDaS for monocular depth estimation in their Depth2Image feature. MiDAS is a state-of-the-art model created by Intel and ETH Zurich researchers that can infer depth using a single 2D photo as an input.
What are you even saying?Interestingly in smartphone sensors they realize they can't to get away without dedicated depth sensor, but leave it to "software engineers" to conjure and redditors to lap it up, with some hamfisted "muh img" " it was chicken first" "argument".
becausecardboard
Monocular depth estimation is an underconstrained problem, i.e. geometrically it is impossible to determine the depth of each pixel in the image
Added that last bit 38 minutes later lol.It has the depth of a
becausecardboard
Monocular depth estimation is an underconstrained problem, i.e. geometrically it is impossible to determine the depth of each pixel in the image
Build a better fetish and the world will beat its meat to your door.lol, the "porn industry" is already flooded with shovelware games, badly animated short movies and hopw roewur ne cartoon. You're just going to see a triple amount of it, and more for even the most niche shit.I am both afraid and excited for the the dark future of porn that is about to unfold.
LIKE CLOCKWORK(...) 99% of "innovation" will be overengineering by "software engineers" (lmao).
It doesn't take much to write better code than in 99% of games. I don't know why people think GPT is "scary". If it can write some code it's just a positive thing, right? It gives more time for creativity and game design when you don't have to think about coding. But we still have to see how useful it is in practice and if we even want to always use it. Imagine if some large open source projects were cleaned up with AI... but I highly doubt it will happen, because open source developers are so stuck up how they want to write code. Not to mention if GPT even knows what good programming is, because it's "learning" from those sucky open source styles itself I guess.GPT3/ChatGPT is scary. The code it outputs is better than most you'd find in the official documentation for most game engines.
My dream would be to record a video of me playing EverQuest and have the AI convert it into as photorealistic as it could. (So people would watch )