Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Josh Sawyer Q&A Thread

Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
4,170
Location
Chicago, IL, Kwa
Both games are great in their own right, but I would say Fallout 2 shows more signs of its crunched devtime than New Vegas. I know a lot of people had technical issues with NV at launch, but I didn't; matter of fact I had waaaaaay more technical issues with FO2 at launch.
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
4,170
Location
Chicago, IL, Kwa

I hate first person cameras, if a game offers both first person and third person I'll always take the third person option.
First person view does a really poor job at simulating a human's field of view range.


Well yes, but surely you can see that some games are better suited to it though? I haven't played FO76 (which I believe you've been enjoying), but Beth games in general are really hard for me to navigate in the third person view; their cameras are set up so that you can't see anything you're interacting with because it's blocked by your avatar. Also it would be really hard to parse visuals or understand movement in a first-person game that had an accurate FOV of 210 degrees, no?
 

Butter

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
8,651
It makes no sense for a first-person game to simulate a real human FOV. Presumably you're not sitting half an inch away from the monitor, and as such it only occupies maybe one third of your FOV. As such a 75-90 FOV in-game feels natural.
 

KVVRR

Learned
Joined
Apr 28, 2020
Messages
652

I hate first person cameras, if a game offers both first person and third person I'll always take the third person option.
First person view does a really poor job at simulating a human's field of view range.

just turn up the FOV slide
personally I find that having the game explicitly state that the character I'm controlling and me are two separate entities (like the third person view obviously does) to be way more annoying. Especially if the camera is shit, which it usually is.
 

Sweeper

Arcane
Joined
Jul 28, 2018
Messages
3,729
They made the game in a year and a half (an astonishing feat). You don't really need to know any more than that.
They made a broken ass game with someone else's engine and 90% of their assets.
It's not an astonishing feat.
New Vegas is great on many levels, but on a technical level it's a glorified mod of Fallout 3.
 

Ninjerk

Arcane
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
14,323
New Vegas is great on many levels, but on a technical level it's a glorified mod of Fallout 3.

Fallout 2 is a glorified mod of Fallout 1
yes.png
 

The Wall

Dumbfuck!
Dumbfuck Zionist Agent
Joined
Jul 19, 2017
Messages
3,724
Location
SERPGIA
Would Josh "2020 Edition" Sawyer be force of incline on any possible future New Vegas 2 project?

I believe that his willpower, talent and passion are all spent and he's best kept in basement fixing & balancing employees bikes. Soul of guy who directed Fallout: New Vegas is dead
 

Kazuki

Arcane
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Messages
851
Location
Noodleland.
It's just not him, the talent that makes FNV is great around him is left too.

The Josh Sawyer "2010 Edition" will never going to bring a great game from Obsidian "2020 edition" team.
 

Quillon

Arcane
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
5,297
It'd be funny if beth/MS greenlights a west coast sequel and Josh -who has nothing better to do- Sawyer directs it whilst Tim & Leo work on TOW2 :P

There'd be a slim hope if Sawya directs it since Tim & Leo's TOW turned out utter shit but ofc

the talent that makes FNV is great around him is left
 
Last edited:

Kazuki

Arcane
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Messages
851
Location
Noodleland.
With how TOW turned out, I think it's safe to say many talents that have left after FNV is going to be decline too.

Most of them is already burn out without any passion and creativity left anymore.
 

Gordian Nutt

Educated
Joined
Aug 8, 2020
Messages
132
Fallout 2 was as bad as New Vegas when it came out and arguably worse

With how TOW turned out, I think it's safe to say many talents that have left after FNV is going to be decline too.

Most of them is already burn out without any passion and creativity left anymore.

Is there a list of those still there?

The big clue of burn out without any passion was Sawyer not caring enough to be part of Avowed, it felt like a big "fuck you even I don't like the shit world I made" but that was him cutting his own throat with his own design

Sorry, hated Pillars 1 and hated Pillars 2 for different reasons and do not care if the tabletop rules he is never going to finish ever see the light of day - the new game he is working on might be interesting but I doubt it
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
4,170
Location
Chicago, IL, Kwa
That's brutal. I never had anything that bad. Just a few broken sidequests and technical wonkiness.
I played unpatched Fallout 2, had zero problems at all.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Lucky you I guess. I had zero problems with NV. Lucky me I guess.

Anecdotally I can only say that I and all of my friends who played it at launch experienced major bugs with FO2. A quick survey of the internet suggests that we were nowhere near alone in that.
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
With how TOW turned out, I think it's safe to say many talents that have left after FNV is going to be decline too.

Most of them is already burn out without any passion and creativity left anymore.

Pillars and Outer Worlds are definitely nowhere near as well written and designed as New Vegas, however I'd still put them at the high end of videogame writing in relative terms. That's like winning the science prize at a special education school I guess, but it is what it is. If you were to ask me who I'd want making a Fallout 6, the only existing AAA developer I might prefer is CDPR.
 

Quillon

Arcane
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
5,297
Now that I think about it I don't want Sawya directing another fallout or Obs making it for that matter. Obs' decline in last decade/post-NV is all due to Sawyer; that he deemed how all the great complex quests in RPGs are too to hard to make therefore unworthy of the effort put in and Obs as a studio embraced it going forward. Even newfag writers can make quests complex and fun given the freedom to make so as we see in BG3 but the writers at Obs have no chance long as they follow the studio design director's directives :P Even watching Sawyer on twitch he always makes comments about how hard it is to make that thing and this thing ffs.

If you were to ask me who I'd want making a Fallout 6, the only existing AAA developer I might prefer is CDPR.

It's not their style but if they were to make so it'd be great, they have fucking ambition to make great games as opposed to ambition to make games as comfortably as possible.
 

Kazuki

Arcane
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Messages
851
Location
Noodleland.
Now that I think about it I don't want Sawya directing another fallout or Obs making it for that matter. Obs' decline in last decade/post-NV is all due to Sawyer; that he deemed how all the great complex quests in RPGs are too to hard to make therefore unworthy of the effort put in and Obs as a studio embraced it going forward. Even newfag writers can make quests complex and fun given the freedom to make so as we see in BG3 but the writers at Obs have no chance long as they follow the studio design director's directives :P Even watching Sawyer on twitch he always makes comments about how hard it is to make that thing and this thing ffs.

Can't you blame him, i think when they failing metacritic bonus for FNV that leads to layoff really not just affecting him but their company as whole.

Imagine putting their maximum effort on it but only to meet a failure and putting their company at risk. So i can understand from their perspective to never bring themselves to put an overambitious and overachiever game design ever again if only that it even more failures and putting their company at risk of bankruptcy.

And that's why i don't think Sawyer or Obsidian as whole will ever change again for better because of that experience that leads them to decline of their quality post FNV.
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
And then

Fallout: A Post Nuclear Interactive Movie

I'm actually on record thinking Witcher 3 is extremely overrated for that reason. Cyberpunk looks... better though? Hard to say until we play it. Anyway, I was mainly thinking about writing.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom