Nigga gave it a 66%, he liked the game.That guy knows what's up.
Good job Hellion and I agree it is a disgrace that there are no historical RPGs like KCD other than KCD.
Everyone is busy making up dumb fantasy instead of using much more interesting real world.
I didn't see you in the Veilguard thread, how's that going? And Veilguard started exactly like KCD2, we'll see how it sells.
Other questions - is the economy as easy to break as in the first game? Are facial animations of random NPCs improved?
There's the Expeditions trilogy (Conquistador, Viking, Rome). The last two are actually genuinely great.That guy knows what's up.
Good job Hellion and I agree it is a disgrace that there are no historical RPGs like KCD other than KCD.
Everyone is busy making up dumb fantasy instead of using much more interesting real world.
Shouldn't trust that one either.
It scathingly digs into Veilguard, but still gives it a 66%.
View attachment 61074
Bro, it's a 1/10 game. Not only is it bad on its own, but it ruins previous games.
That's the problem with game reviewers, they have to treat everything with kid gloves because they don't want to upset people too much. You can't be a real critic if you are constantly pulling your punches. Strangely enough, the same is true for creatives themselves.
That's why scores are bullshit. You can't have two thirds of the maximum possible score be responsible for technical stability and the remaining one third responsible for everything else, from writing to production values to game systems. Especially when scoring an RPG with such a system.Shouldn't trust that one either.
It scathingly digs into Veilguard, but still gives it a 66%.
View attachment 61074
Bro, it's a 1/10 game. Not only is it bad on its own, but it ruins previous games.
That's the problem with game reviewers, they have to treat everything with kid gloves because they don't want to upset people too much. You can't be a real critic if you are constantly pulling your punches. Strangely enough, the same is true for creatives themselves.
Rating anything with a score lower than 40-50% means that it's fundamentally broken and literally unplayable due to gamebreaking bugs. And Failguard, for all its comically large flaws, is at least technically super-stable. Edgelord scores and attitude like "LOL IT'S SO GAY, I GIVE IT ZERO STARS" are good for some laughs in a forum or for clickbait, but it's not really a sign of a serious reviewer who fully and objectively evaluated the game he was given to review.
-looks at siggy-
That's why scores are bullshit. You can't have two thirds of the maximum possible score be responsible for technical stability and the remaining one third responsible for everything else, from writing to production values to game systems. Especially when scoring an RPG with such a system.Shouldn't trust that one either.
It scathingly digs into Veilguard, but still gives it a 66%.
View attachment 61074
Bro, it's a 1/10 game. Not only is it bad on its own, but it ruins previous games.
That's the problem with game reviewers, they have to treat everything with kid gloves because they don't want to upset people too much. You can't be a real critic if you are constantly pulling your punches. Strangely enough, the same is true for creatives themselves.
Rating anything with a score lower than 40-50% means that it's fundamentally broken and literally unplayable due to gamebreaking bugs. And Failguard, for all its comically large flaws, is at least technically super-stable. Edgelord scores and attitude like "LOL IT'S SO GAY, I GIVE IT ZERO STARS" are good for some laughs in a forum or for clickbait, but it's not really a sign of a serious reviewer who fully and objectively evaluated the game he was given to review.
BTW the two good youtuber reviews I've seen so far are NeonKnight and Italian Spartacus.
Probably review guidelines didnt allow them to include that. I mean we went from there is a VERY optional gay scene with Hans to you being able to bang a lot of different dudes.
The IGN reviewer said he banged several different dudes and there were a lot of gay romance options. Is that true? Sounds like something pretty major to me.
Mac said some guy in a tavern proposed they have drinks, and Mac refused him. Systemic sodomy? Emergent gayplay?
Do you write your reviews in greek and then translate it manually to english? How does your website work? Just curious.
On some days about 90% of what I post is exaggerated for laughs, irony, or trolling. Hardly anyone gets it, I suppose everyone here expects everyone else is really simple, expectations are low.
