- Jun 30, 2021
That's....an interesting list.From what I've played here is the tier list of Classes:
S+ Warlock : The ability of combining arcane spells and psionic spells clearly rank it up above
S+ Sorcerer same as above
S+: Psychic healer same as above
S: Barbarian extreme damage output combined with powerful AOE spell and capacities: Rage and spirit animal. A must have
A-: Fighter: one feat each level , it's pretty nice.
A+: Wizard/ Psionicist/druid/: thanks to having access to great AOE spells and very large spell pool
A: Samourai: 2 weapon-style combo warrior type.
A+: Paladin: very worth it, great special abilities and healing spells, almost an S tier
B: Rogue : low damage output compared to their counterparts, has some utilities regarding dialogue but it's not worth it
B: Bard: good support special abilities but a mediocre fighter overall, I would rather take a barbarian.
C: Ranger : terrible damage output close range and long range, underwhelming overall, it's not worth it and you need to waste space slots for ammo.
C: Death knight: you gain shitty special abilities in exchange of feats, take the warrior instead
C: Mage knight/ Storm warrior/ psychic warrior: jack of all trades but excel in nothing, mediocre warriors and mediocre spellcasters
C+: Bishop: because the turn undead spell combined with feats is quite useful
E: monk: trash, provides no utility, I don't get it what its utilities are.
I don't think I'm wrong on this ranking tier.
I also don't catch it why there are so much feats adding meaningless damages or some bonus to a special spell when there are many feats granting a bonus to an entire spell class, feels like bloat to me.
I'd also disagree with a lot of it.