negative brofist

[Konjad]

My Dearest Leader and His Subordinates , I have an idea.

Make negative brofists (I don't know how should they be called though) and a simple system.

Brofisting would work just like it is right now.

Negative brofisting would be a bit more interesting:
- For every negative brofist you give out, you also lose one brofist point of your's and you cannot have negative amount.(would prevent spamming negative brofists)
- If your Negative Brofist amount is 25% or more of Brofist amount you are on Official Codex Shitlist (which would be public) and lose access to forums, with exception of the shittiest subforums (Console/weaboo cRPG, MMORPG, Prosperland, and GD). You get the access back when Negative Brofist amount are 15% or less of your Brofist amount.

It's a system of a great potential

 

[ironyuri]

I see no way this could be abused.

 

[Grunker]

See what I'm saying Mrowak? Home-brew systems are worthless.

 

[Bruticis]

kony: this one is genious
kony was kicked by Bruticis.

CDS chat will have to do because I can't do it here.

 

[TwinkieGorilla]

Hey somebody should make a negative brofist thread!

 

[LundB]

This idea wasn't that great the first 10,000 times it was posted as a new thread in site feedback.

Nothing has changed. Konjad go to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200.

 

[evdk]

This idea wasn't that great the first 10,000 times it was posted as a new thread in site feedback.

Nothing has changed. Konjad go to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200.

I propose that Konjad should test drive the "restricted forum browsing" that he has proposed. It is only fair.

 

[Gragt]

You can consider that any post that I didn't brofist received a non-brofist from me. That's how you code efficiently.

 

[King Crispy]

Maybe they could implement something like this over at RPGWatch.

 

[Mrowak]

See what I'm saying Mrowak? Home-brew systems are worthless.

Yeah... but you know how it is. Before our system designer becomes the Supreme Saviour of Mankind (TM) he must go through "make shit" phase and spawn an abomination or two. Which is the case here. Don't write Konjad off yet.

 

[rogozhin]

I propose that ironyuri gets restricted to the Playground until he updates his fucking Arcanum CYOA.

 

[rpgcodexusername]

negative brofists are too dangerous
http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?threads/brofist-collides-with-anti-brofist.69193/

 

[Excidium]

No, fuck you

Brofists already go too far, they only justify their existance because they save scrolling time since people stopped quoting an entire wall of text just to follow with a ""

 

[SCO]

The shittiest posters already only post in gd.

 

[EG]

My Dearest Leader and His Subordinates , I have an idea.

Make negative brofists (I don't know how should they be called though) and a simple system.

Brofisting would work just like it is right now.

Negative brofisting would be a bit more interesting:
- For every negative brofist you give out, you also lose one brofist point of your's and you cannot have negative amount.(would prevent spamming negative brofists)
- If your Negative Brofist amount is 25% or more of Brofist amount you are on Official Codex Shitlist (which would be public) and lose access to forums, with exception of the shittiest subforums (Console/weaboo cRPG, MMORPG, Prosperland, and GD). You get the access back when Negative Brofist amount are 15% or less of your Brofist amount.

It's a system of a great potential

Isn't spamming a banning offense here?

 

[Clockwork Knight]

- If your Negative Brofist amount is 25% or more of Brofist amount you are on Official Codex Shitlist (which would be public) and lose access to forums, with exception of the shittiest subforums (Console/weaboo cRPG, MMORPG, Prosperland, and GD). You get the access back when Negative Brofist amount are 15% or less of your Brofist amount.

>Send a car to the shitty forums to hang out with the weaboos because he's not kool enough to hang out with you
>Let him back in once the weaboos declare he's kool enough



fake edit: I have no idea why I wrote "car" instead of "guy", but I'm not changing it

 

[Harg Harfardarssen]

The negative brofist could work if it were only available in threads with "brofist" in the title.

 

[Hoaxmetal]

Why not being able to brofist brofists?

 

[Ranselknulf]

Negative Brofist hmmm

Maybe call it a Nut Punch

 

[toro]

Why not being able to brofist brofists?

bro-ception !?

 

[EG]

My Dearest Leader and His Subordinates , I have an idea.

Make negative brofists (I don't know how should they be called though) and a simple system.

Brofisting would work just like it is right now.

Negative brofisting would be a bit more interesting:
- For every negative brofist you give out, you also lose one brofist point of your's and you cannot have negative amount.(would prevent spamming negative brofists)
- If your Negative Brofist amount is 25% or more of Brofist amount you are on Official Codex Shitlist (which would be public) and lose access to forums, with exception of the shittiest subforums (Console/weaboo cRPG, MMORPG, Prosperland, and GD). You get the access back when Negative Brofist amount are 15% or less of your Brofist amount.

nah...seems too complicated for its own good.

So complex, we need four threads on the go about it.

 

[Cassidy]

People suggesting/trolling these idiotic ideas should have all their brofists purged.

 

[Ranselknulf]

Negative's probably are a bad idea.

Overzealous trolls usually make alt accounts to attack those they don't agree with on message boards. I'm normally pretty skeptical of any forum message board ranking systems.

I just tossed out the nut punch idea because it seemed to work with brofist lol.

 

[Taluntain]

I'm thinking negative brofisting allowed for your own posts. That way overinflated egos can self-medicate.

 

[King Crispy]

I like it! Call it self-fisting instead!