(Not so) fun fact: I had to take footage of that goblin fights so many times.
Reasons included:
- Forgot to replace the goblin placeholder icon (the image didn't belong to us)
- Forgot to turn off the fog of war which isn't tuned yet so it made the video look weird
- Part of the level was still showing whitebox, so we had to put a huge rock to hide it
- The video was shot at like 1pm in-game so the sun was so bright you couldn't see much at all. Had to spam short rest (didn't have enough food for long rest...) until we found better lighting (no way to "skip time" in the current build)
- Numerous crashes because development build
- Shitty RNG, so many dead adventurers while trying to record cool stuff
Demo was fun, go play it.
Demo was fun, go play it.
Seconded, Fun little demo that built up my interest. I believe it is here for a limited time? So paly it.
The demo doesn't allow use of the Paladin class does it?
But they can climb and all that.The demo doesn't allow use of the Paladin class does it?
Only the most generic skill class, the most generic martial class, the most generic divine and most generic arcane...
But they can climb and all that.
You're alright fella.Barbarian > Fighter
Only the most generic skill class, the most generic martial class, the most generic divine and most generic arcane...
Sorcerer is better than Wizard only in CRPG, where types of enemies you encounter always fixed in quantity and quality, so sorcerer player can cheese through game easier (game that was already easy, lol) + in some computer games it's preferable that main character was able to persuade (mosly because companions is dimwits or no skill share between members of party). Also, what kind of cheap ass would regret spending money on spellbooks? Pretty sure any wizard with chaotic alignment can spent money on wine and woman too, so this argument is invalid.IMO :
Barbarian > Fighter
Sorcerer > Wizard
Barbarians doesn't need expensive armors and sorcerers doesn't need expensive spellbooks. Both can spend their money on wine and woman like true chaotic guys.
Sorry, I can't force myself to like this class. Sure there people who enjoy it, but unfortunately I not from these people. Usually, I trying not focusing on things that I don't like, but one particular individual showed so much love to monks on codex in pathfinder thread- it invoked not very good memories.^I was with you until you took a pot shot at monks. Not cool, man.
o, any class who don't fit your narrow class selection is generic class?
Sorcerer is better than Wizard only in CRPG, where types of enemies you encounter always fixed in quantity and quality
Punching a well-armored knight with a tower shield doesn't seem reasonable.
Uhm, yes, it does, you try to shiv the guy between the armor plates or in the hole in the helmet. Or just use general thrusting force to push them to the ground so you can more easily shiv them between the armor plates. I also said it's not reasonable, not that it doesn't make sense (which it doesn't as well). I mean it stretches the suspension of disbelief a little bit too much.Using a sword against a heavily armored knight also makes no sense. Maces and hammers are much better
NOT FRIENDRY PERSON
Charisma-based classes usually end up being too good in crpgs. Charisma ends up controlling the most skill checks in a lot of d20-based games.I can only reiterate: fuck charisma-based casters. Charisma is dump stat, has always been and will always be. It was designed as a dump stat. Stop trying to make charisma happen.