cvv
Arcane
I'm currently 150 hours in it.
Does the game kick you out if you lose your internet connection?
I'm currently 150 hours in it.
Backlash my ass, it's just expensive on their end.Btw I'm not an expert but I think always online has always been the most effective DRM. Devs stopped using not because it was useless but because the backlash was absolutely devastating, not just from gamers but from mainstream journos too. Now Rockstar had the balls to revive it and they utterly got away with it. I haven't seen a single article lambasting them.
Rockstar already runs servers for their MP, adding a tiny extra branch doesn't make difference for them. And even for pure SP games renting a bit of cloud from Amazon can't be that expensive. Denuvo isn't free either.Backlash my ass, it's just expensive on their end.Btw I'm not an expert but I think always online has always been the most effective DRM. Devs stopped using not because it was useless but because the backlash was absolutely devastating, not just from gamers but from mainstream journos too. Now Rockstar had the balls to revive it and they utterly got away with it. I haven't seen a single article lambasting them.
And you're saying that as a hard fact or you're just pulling it out of your ass, relying on nobody bothering to check your BS? You know, like people usually do in internet debates?You can't just "rent a bit of cloud" and do checks like ACreed tried. You need actual infrastructure and keep enough logic away from clients to make it hard to reproduce.
And when you hide logic from customers, then you needed to pay for CPU time of cloud computers.You can't just "rent a bit of cloud" and do checks like ACreed tried. You need actual infrastructure and keep enough logic away from clients to make it hard to reproduce.
You can go ahead and prove me wrong. Then even make some millions undercutting denuvo.And you're saying that as a hard fact or you're just pulling it out of your ass, relying on nobody bothering to check your BS? You know, like people usually do in internet debates?
FPS reduction has always been a myth, the real problem with Denuvo is loading times, those can be p. absurd.
Good on him for finally including 1% and 0.1% lows though, but I have no idea how those two managed to be lower than the minimum...
FPS reduction has always been a myth, the real problem with Denuvo is loading times, those can be p. absurd.
At it was even over 30% difference on weaker CPUs.FPS reduction has always been a myth, the real problem with Denuvo is loading times, those can be p. absurd.
FPS reduction was a thing with Witcher 2.
FPS reduction was a thing with Witcher 2.
And when they patched it with GoG executable to prevent hiccups and to double framerate. Theirs publisher complained about that removal. Something about doing stuff against agreement.FPS reduction was a thing with Witcher 2.
I forgot Witcher 2 was DRM'd in some random countries because of the local publisher, despite being DRM free everywhere else. So fucking retarded. wHAt iS tHE inTErneT?