DA2 is unequivocably a bad game. It's not reactive in a narrative or gameplay sense, with enemies that passively fight you and are just bloat bars. You fight wave after wave of stupid shit. Dungeons are straight away affairs. None of the bosses are interesting and are few in number. The game has less build options than Origins - you literally just pump your class core stats. Itemization is nonexistant to the point where it is not a joy to find items. Quests have you revisit the same desolate mindless uninspired areas over and over again. The main city is totally lifeless and devoid of any intersting features or characters. Your compaions are several different shades of dropped on their head as a child. The game is ugly aesthetically. The story is nonsensical in many places, motiviations typically biowarian. The story is contrived in many ways and offers little refuge for roleplayers to express their chosen identitiy. The game invalidates preexisting dragon age lore and consistently proves that yes things can get more retarded in a game that is already 'special'.
1) "unequivocably a bad game." - You're entitled to your opinion.
2) "passively fight" - Is it the Gandhi thing? Regardless, I haven't noticed any fundamental difference between DA2 fights and fighting AI in any other game, sorry.
3) "Dungeons are straight away affairs" - And this is bad, because..?
4) "None of the bosses are interesting" - I agree with yout here.
5) "less build options than Origins" - DA:O had many strong points but believing that it has a lot of viable build options... what did you say about self delusion?
6) "Itemization is nonexistant" - If you haven't played the game you're trying to nuke, you should at least watch a letsplay. Just a friendly suggestion.
7) "areas" - Ah, the reused assets discussion. As exciting as it was four years ago. /yawn
8) "city is totally lifeless" - I didn't notice anything like that.
I think that's enough because the rest of your post is even more subjective. My reply will then be equally opinionated: for all its glaring shortcomings DA2 featured one of the greatest combat systems ever invented and its encounter design was unique and tragically underappreciated (yes, I did like the waves).
1) It's not an opinion, it's fact that DA2 sucks. Saying this line is a total cop-out. Wanna know why?
At the end of the day everything is everyone's opinion. What makes opinion fact is what you use to back up your opinoin. If you don't back up your opinion, it's a worthless "just an opinion" opinion.
2) Totally passive, the only enemies in the game with abilities are ogres and mages. You fight 3 ogres all game. The ogres came from the previous game, copypaste. The mages in DA2 have 4 spells period, all game long, no matter what race of mage, the same spells. The spells are utterly unimpactful. The only meaningful one is the aoe knockback spell. Spiders had poison and web in dao, why is it gone in DA2? The fights are passive because the enemies you face do not
do anything.
3) Because dungeons are about a) exploration b) choice; in rpgs of old you had to explore to beat a dungeon and you had the chocie of completing optional stuff - in DA2 neither exploration nor optional (or hidden) stuff exists; a dungeon isn't much of a dungeon if it's just another hallway; we don't refer to dungeons as hallways in real life, the idea of a dungeon is encapsulated in mood and harrowing experience
5) I did not say DAO had a lot. DA2 has even less. You can't even equip a bow as a warrior in DA2. Great.
6) I have played this godforsaken game, go jump off the bridge you're trolling under, seriously. The itemization is non-existant for several overarching reasons the first of which being items have high primary attribute requirements, are hard class-locked, have poorly explained stats, have bad stat distribution, and offer non-choices (the difference between common equipment vs common equipment is +1 armor or +1 str in many cases, an arbitrary choice; what rare items you have to choose from are not much different).
7) "I eat shit, this is acknowledged, why are you bringing it up?" Because you're defending dragon age 2 and saying it's a ...good game. Your opinion is retarded and you know it.
8) It's easy not to. Take a moment to think about what you're playing
a) there are no notable NPCs you can bump into on the street (have you played BG2? This happens all the time in BG2)
b) The soundscape is nonexistant (listen to the game for a minute, the "city" sounds like a desert, not even any background crowd noises to simulate the feeling of a city)
c) In battle, citizens have no collision detection. Just one detail among many I can recall off the top of my head
d) The city doesn't notably change over the 10 years you play in it; it's totally static and dull and lifeless and stupid.
I suggest you leave this site. DA2 is an abomination which cannot be defended. The best you can do is, "Well, I can name worse RPGss" which isn't much of an argument. Defending it is inexcusable.