Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

The Last Of Us 2 - now with protagonist-murdering trannies

LabRat

Learned
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Messages
154
Location
Taiwan
1592621185547.jpg
 

Olinser

Arbiter
Joined
Nov 1, 2018
Messages
977
Location
Denial
Were there people who thought the leaks were fake? Lol.

Yes. There were people that were convinced they were fake.

And were impervious to the logical point that if they were fake, Sony wouldn't have gone insane copyright striking anybody that tried to TALK about them.
 

commie

The Last Marxist
Patron
Joined
May 12, 2010
Messages
1,865,260
Location
Where one can weep in peace
Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Divinity: Original Sin 2
The thing is that killing the main character in such an arbitrary and unexpected manner can work, as it does in No Country For Old Men when Josh Brolin's character is just killed off screen by a bunch of garden variety thugs after struggling through 3/4 of the movie against Javier Bardem's relentless killer. It subverts the expectation of the audience of a happy ending after all the struggle and highlight that in this world there are no happy endings.

That could have been done here, but it's so inconsistent and badly written with bullshit motivation and cheap manipulation, that you don't give a fuck about any of the characters. David Cage makes the same mistakes.

Furthermore, it's the lack of player input that makes the worst sin: You are in control UNTIL the moment the director decides to show you the CORRECT way to finish the story. In a movie, which is passive, it's not such a problem: you can hate the way the story turns but since you don't control the characters directly, it doesn't matter.

In a game which tries to give the illusion of some kind of freedom and choice, to then be forced to accept one railroaded ending that makes no logical sense is absurd. It's already been a couple of decades where there are several endings in games of this type and how hard would it have been to give a few forks, even at a fake-choice Telltale CYOA level to keep Joel alive(it could have been handwaved that he was sent away somewhere to recover and that's why the rest of the game is more or less the same), or even more simply, at the end of the game you get to choose to kill or spare Abby(as has been done for years already). This simple thing would have halved the negative player reaction alone.
 
Last edited:

Dexter

Arcane
Joined
Mar 31, 2011
Messages
15,655
Some Advanced A.I. action:


This but non-ironically. The one pearl of wisdom from Rich Evans of RedLetterMedia had about video games is that all story-based games have rich, detailed story documents, but when it comes to the gameplay, the pitch is "Eh, its a third-person shooter".
For reference:
 

Togukawa

Savant
Patron
Joined
Jul 27, 2016
Messages
317
It's already been a couple of decades where there are several endings in games of this type and how hard would it have been to give a few forks, even at a fake-choice Telltale CYOA level to keep Joel alive(it could have been handwaved that he was sent away somewhere to recover and that's why the rest of the game is more or less the same), or even more simply, as the end of the game you get to choose to kill or spare Abby(as has been done for years already).
But that would violate their artistic integrity! MAYBE a choice between a red, green or blue filter tint over the ending, but surely you don't propose to go further than that?
 

turkishronin

Arcane
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
1,734
Location
where the best is like the worst


totally_a_female.jpeg

I've been around strong women before. Seen impressive feats of strength, girls who can do lots of pull-ups, move impressive weight (for a female), and they have some legit defined musculature. Can even look pretty attractive.

But this "girl" is fucking YOKED. I know it's been said a million times, but you don't develop this type of physique as a female without Serena Williams-tier steroids while hitting the iron HARD. Who in their right mind thought this was a realistic depiction of a stronk woman lmao


ample sources of steroids and protein in a post-apoc world...
 

cvv

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
18,969
Location
Kingdom of Bohemia
Enjoy the Revolution! Another revolution around the sun that is.
In a game which tries to give the illusion of some kind of freedom and choice, to then be forced to accept one railroaded ending that makes no logical sense is absurd

That's why narrative games can only work if you have a clearly defined character and a "railroaded" story, without any customization or freedom of choice. Like Witcher 3 (all Witchers in fact).

In general tho I increasingly believe games will never be able to hold a candle to movies and books narrative-wise, precisely because they are interactive. The best developers can hope for is a story that's not aggressively retarded combined with great gameplay. That's what makes great games.

Games like TLOU2 will be seen as failed experiments aborted by history.
 

Pika-Cthulhu

Arcane
Joined
Apr 16, 2007
Messages
8,158


totally_a_female.jpeg

I've been around strong women before. Seen impressive feats of strength, girls who can do lots of pull-ups, move impressive weight (for a female), and they have some legit defined musculature. Can even look pretty attractive.

But this "girl" is fucking YOKED. I know it's been said a million times, but you don't develop this type of physique as a female without Serena Williams-tier steroids while hitting the iron HARD. Who in their right mind thought this was a realistic depiction of a stronk woman lmao


ample sources of steroids and protein in a post-apoc world...

and enough safety to not have constantly high cortisol levels from stress, truly a blessed time
 

Carrion

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jun 30, 2011
Messages
3,648
Location
Lost in Necropolis
In general tho I increasingly believe games will never be able to hold a candle to movies and books narrative-wise, precisely because they are interactive.
Games have enormous potential for storytelling precisely because of their interactivity, but none of it's going to be realized as long as game writers pretend to be movie directors and treat gameplay and story as separate things. Freedom of choice is a strength, a unique feature that no other medium can offer except in very limited ways (like CYOA books), yet it's treated as some sort of a hindrance that needs to be suppressed at every turn, just so that the story can play out the exact way it was intended to. Can't let the player screw up the big story moments by doing something that isn't in the script.

As long as your primary way of telling your story is through non-interactive cutscenes, you're not making proper use of your medium.
 

Sodafish

Arcane
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
9,052
Why is that fake news Dexter?
It wasn't "after he completed his playthrough", it was when Joel-rino got his head caved in early in the game.

Right. Still, ultimately a foolish gesture. Sony doesn't care, they already have his money.

Exactly. Idiot antics. If they really wanted to hurt Sony where it matters (and you better believe a failing bottom line is the ONLY thing that will stop companies peddling such trash) they would either demand a refund or give the game away so that they lose sales.
 

Togukawa

Savant
Patron
Joined
Jul 27, 2016
Messages
317
Why is that fake news Dexter?
It wasn't "after he completed his playthrough", it was when Joel-rino got his head caved in early in the game.

Right. Still, ultimately a foolish gesture. Sony doesn't care, they already have his money.

Disagree. One copy is meaningless in the grand scheme of things, but a symbol can have significant impact. And cutting up your disk is quite a powerful symbol, and the footage is already being shared. I bet it will cause many more people/fans not to buy it, than if he had just refunded.
 

Dexter

Arcane
Joined
Mar 31, 2011
Messages
15,655
Right. Still, ultimately a foolish gesture. Sony doesn't care, they already have his money.
Itz being shared across Twatter, YouTube, Leddit and various other Social media and being seen by hundreds of thousands of prospective customers that will connect said gesture with their game sucking dick. That Twat alone has like 17k likes. Every capable PR person would likely rather deal with a hundred or maybe even a thousand people refunding their game silently than having something like that go viral across the Internet on the eve of their new product release 7 years in the making.
 

Azalin

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
7,565
Don't you end up playing most of the game as the tranny?Now that I think of it it's quite symbolic a character that looks like the head of the studio fucks the main character(you) in the ass,that's deep
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom