Helly
Translating for brofists
Looks like Angry joe is pretty butthurt by the ending
Think it's too late to ask Cleve for a spot in his VAULT-CO shelter?Biodrones agreeing with a negative review? Truly these are the end times.
Wan't this the point of the MP though? And anyway it' doing a far better job at it, especially since you can't buy an MP pass for a used PC version. And it's actually better than the SP. AND they're releasing free content quite regularly.The only thing here that makes sense (aside from 'make something cheaply') is EA/Bioware planning this controversy and DLC ending 'fix' as a way to reduce game trade-ins.
I would honestly be more apprehensive if the Bethesturds started agreeing with us.Think it's too late to ask Cleve for a spot in his VAULT-CO shelter?Biodrones agreeing with a negative review? Truly these are the end times.
I saw plenty of agreement with Vault Dweller's Dragon Age 2 review on BSN.Biodrones agreeing with a negative review? Truly these are the end times.
The ending DLC will have Shepard sitting on a chair, in the middle of the void, thinking of his decisions and full of self-loathing. Then every squad member will appear, and tell him: "Congratulations!". The End.
Just wait and see :p
same poster:Not gonna lie, I decided not to read this solely because it came from rpg codex; that forum is even worse than this one, which is a truly astounding achievement
others:I don't think that they can be described as elitists, they're just lonely nerds who spam smilies and reaction images from 4chan in an attempt to be funny. I finally read the review despite my initial trepidation and I enjoyed it, the author employed a nice vocabulary that never felt forced, why can't the rest of the site be like that?
He didn't like Kirrahe's Hold the Line speech. His opinions are invalid.
I think the reviewer was trying to find fault and did not give the game a chance so cannot trust what he said.
There's nothing in that article that's about "opinions" (all things are stated as judgments), and there are so many things wrong in it, objectively (but anyway they don't care for debate at all, so why bother?).
It is just a reharsal of some of the negative masses' opionion, nothing more. There's nothing new, nothing intelligent, nothing constructive nor technically well exposed.
But naturally people here just want this "bash the ending no matter if right or wrong, if relevant or irrelevant, if well exposed or not, as long as you bash it and the game (as a result for the 'bad' ending)", so all the rest (that should be the most important part) is all irrelevant.
So, no one has answered yet. What kind of game do these "esteemed gentlemen" consider to be a good game? It sounds to me like their standards are just unfeasibly high, especially when you consider the amount of development time ME3 got.
I see that Mass Effect 3 is truly an intellectual gameI want to ask this TNO if he knows anything at all about the philosophical theme "order vs. chaos". It seems to me he knows nothing about it (as 90% of the people here that pretends to judge the narrative of ME, that's ENTIRELY based upon it) and lacking this knowledge all his judgements on the narrative are completely faulted from beginning, no matter if what he says can be right or wrong.
Since the reply is obviously NO (if he is not lying about it) he cannot pretend to state a judgment on a thing he has NO BACKGROUND at all upon and that's at the root of all the narrative. It would be like pretending to judge Rimbaud without knowing anything about symbolism and/or latin.
You should expect every review that can be called as such to know these things; alas that's not so.
Ah yes, "RPG Codex." An obscure hive of elitists engaging in feigned highbrow criticism to mask its collective inability to enjoy any game newer than Fallout. We have dismissed this site.
Bioware Social NetworkI want to ask this TNO if he knows anything at all about the philosophical theme "order vs. chaos". It seems to me he knows nothing about it (as 90% of the people here that pretends to judge the narrative of ME, that's ENTIRELY based upon it) and lacking this knowledge all his judgements on the narrative are completely faulted from beginning, no matter if what he says can be right or wrong.
Since the reply is obviously NO (if he is not lying about it) he cannot pretend to state a judgment on a thing he has NO BACKGROUND at all upon and that's at the root of all the narrative. It would be like pretending to judge Rimbaud without knowing anything about symbolism and/or latin.
You should expect every review that can be called as such to know these things; alas that's not so.