I'd take complex & buggy over bland & bug free.
but you have a backup, right?His old formspring which is gone forever.where can i read more of Sawyer's insights into gamebryo?
Guys are you nuts? What kind of recoil can after shooting from ENERGY weapon? What the point in energy weapons if one of few pluses (increased accuracy) removed for sake of "balance". What kind of retard would construct energy weapons
The Happy Ending.
I was annoyed by this in Fallout games, where energy weapons was equal in damage and accuracy to guns or sometimes even inferior,lol.
Guys are you nuts? What kind of recoil can be after shooting from ENERGY weapon?
2.5 million views. Yo momma.
On the side note, I gotta say "Welcome to the future. Try not to break it" is a great tagline.
regular firearms are just kinetic energy weaponsGuys are you nuts? What kind of recoil can be after shooting from ENERGY weapon?
I'm sure he meant that, since in Fallout energy weapons mean photonic (laser) weapon.regular firearms are just kinetic energy weaponsGuys are you nuts? What kind of recoil can be after shooting from ENERGY weapon?
you probably mean photonic weapon
'Try not to break it' is a shot at Bethesda when they said ' B.E.T.A, Break it early test application'
I too would like to believe they put this much thought into it.Guys are you nuts? What kind of recoil can be after shooting from ENERGY weapon? What the point in energy weapons if one of few pluses (increased accuracy) removed for sake of "balance". What kind of retard would construct energy weapons with same flaws that average guns? I can imagine that coversation:
First Engineer> "We have technology to create energy weapons, which better than average guns in armor penetration, accuracy, damage to living material (radioactive burns more dangerous than gun wounds) and almost completely silent. But cost of this technology will be much more than average guns.
Retard Director> "Can we add pew, pew to weapons? Cuz silent weapons is boring! Can we add recoil, so energy weapon will have the same "feel and vibe" (tm) as average guns? Armor damage and flesh damage is too OP, gun users will be offended, nerf it!"
First Engineer> "But such implementations will not make energy any less expensive!"
Retard Director > "I don't care, I want pew pew. I want weapon FEEL in my hand!"
First Engineer > "The only feel you will get - it's is taste of energy ray" *kills director with his energy weapon, nobody notices since weapon silent*
*kills guards since energy weapon penetrate armor and their mutant dogs, since flesh damage is superior"
*leaves building and sells blueprints to company which develop normal weapons*
The Happy Ending.
I was annoyed by this in Fallout games, where energy weapons was equal in damage and accuracy to guns or sometimes even inferior,lol.
'Try not to break it' is a shot at Bethesda when they said ' B.E.T.A, Break it early test application'
Its a coincidence...they wouldn't come up with a motto out of pettiness.
Correct, it's marketing. Retard.'Try not to break it' is a shot at Bethesda when they said ' B.E.T.A, Break it early test application'
Its a coincidence...they wouldn't come up with a motto out of pettiness.
It's not, just like 'from creators of original Fallout and Fallout:New Vegas' is not a coincidence
'Try not to break it' is a shot at Bethesda when they said ' B.E.T.A, Break it early test application'
Its a coincidence...they wouldn't come up with a motto out of pettiness.
It's not, just like 'from creators of original Fallout and Fallout:New Vegas' is not a coincidence
Yeah, they want to advertise it as best as they can, their angle is not "fucking bethesda"
Correct, it's marketing. Retard.'Try not to break it' is a shot at Bethesda when they said ' B.E.T.A, Break it early test application'
Its a coincidence...they wouldn't come up with a motto out of pettiness.
It's not, just like 'from creators of original Fallout and Fallout:New Vegas' is not a coincidence
It's supposed to be better than good ol' ballistic weappons, because nobody otherwise will bothers to produce it, since producing energy weapons means messing around with radioactive elements of micro nuclear reactors (and you should develop technology to produce micro nuclear/fission reactors first, lol) and protect user from radiation. Even if you will use fission reactors, you still need energy stabilization, so energy weapon didn't blow up in hand of user. You need investing in research of new materials and other stuff. If after years of research and investment energy weapon will be inferior to guns - failed project, move on another. Nobody will produce failed product.Now while I agree that energy weapons should feel different, and shouldn't have recoil, roofs that energy weapons would be so inherently superior to ballistic weapons? It's just concentrated radiation, while lethal, is not necessarily more so than the good old high velocity metal.
Well it's shooting definitely not average bullets (atleast visual effect is different), so I assumed that this is energy weapon.Is it an energy weapon tho?
After re-watching video I can't even sure which type of weapon is this, since it looks like 3 types of projectile combined, lol.However, as you can see, projectile type doesn't matter.
They were rather colorful, too. You usually couldn't see that because they kept the weather shitty most of the time, or you would see the bad LOD models in the distance:Citation please. Flat and not properly shadowed city are fine? The overexposed southern part of the map are fine? Glowing puke is fine? Fallout 4 looks like shit but different kind of, much meaner, seeing The Outer Worlds adapting similar techniques actively hurts the game.Fallout 4 visuals are fine
https://store.steampowered.com/app/377160/Fallout_4/
Or you could play the game. It's a piece of shit but the visuals are fine.
It's supposed to be better than good ol' ballistic weappons, because nobody otherwise will bothers to produce it, since producing energy weapons means messing around with radioactive elements of micro nuclear reactors (and you should develop technology to produce micro nuclear/fission reactors first, lol) and protect user from radiation. Even if you will use fission reactors, you still need energy stabilization, so energy weapon didn't blow up in hand of user. You need investing in research of new materials and other stuff. If after years of research and investment energy weapon will be inferior to guns - failed project, move on another. Nobody will produce failed product.Now while I agree that energy weapons should feel different, and shouldn't have recoil, roofs that energy weapons would be so inherently superior to ballistic weapons? It's just concentrated radiation, while lethal, is not necessarily more so than the good old high velocity metal.
Correct, it's marketing. Retard.'Try not to break it' is a shot at Bethesda when they said ' B.E.T.A, Break it early test application'
Its a coincidence...they wouldn't come up with a motto out of pettiness.
It's not, just like 'from creators of original Fallout and Fallout:New Vegas' is not a coincidence
Marketing by throwing shades
A bug free Obsidian game?