DLC/Expansion where you play as a black lesbian transwomynz.So when Bitcher 4 underperforms, what's it gonna be?
- DLC/Expansion where you play as Geralt
- Announce Witcher 5 super quickly where Geralt returns
The leftist cucks will never admit defeat by returning to Geralt. Next witcher game will either let you make your own witcher of either sex or have a preset male and female witcher (which might still be Ciri).So when Bitcher 4 underperforms, what's it gonna be?
- DLC/Expansion where you play as Geralt
- Announce Witcher 5 super quickly where Geralt returns
Problem is, they would have made her a witcher.They should've made Triss as a protagonist.
Too bad because it'd be a golden opportunity to start a new series The Witchess.Problem is, they would have made her a witcher.They should've made Triss as a protagonist.
Oh, so that's why all those Tomb Raider games failed spectacularly...Nah. It's lost much of the 'cool factor'. The primary target audience for medieval fantasy RPG's is men. Of those, a significant portion prefer to play as a cool guy rather than a woman.
Unless it actually influences game's story or design, few people will care about the inner workings of a corporation. Most CDPR audience is not composed of chronically online clients of rage-baiters.Add in the complete mess the company is in due to doubling down on ESG/DEI and that further erodes interest.
All DAV marketing materials posted online were ratioed into oblivion. This is not the case with previevs for the Witcher 4. There's totally different energy around this title. Outside of some youtube rage merchants who need next fodder, because their 107th video about Veilguard doesn't get as many views as the previous ones and nobody (including Obsidian, it seems) cares about Avowed.The game will sell decently but of those who do buy it, a lot will openly mock it if it has anything even remotely similar to Taash from Dragon Age: Veilguard.
literally nobody who knows the source material was surprised by this announcement. You're grasping now.Given that they've already confirmed that Ciri will be able to partake of 'non-traditional romances' then that is highly likely.
there was no official statement, simlly a responce to a comment on X:The company is currently in full on damage control. Putting out panicked statements about not working with Sweet Baby Inc
CDPR hires what, 1000+ employees and also works with thousands of contractors. There will always be some bad apples. However the question is the degree they can influence the project.or even knowing what the consultancy company is until recently. Naturally the comments were brutal, proving that it was a lie by linking the company's own creepy videos expressing their commitment to DEI/ESG as well as pointing out that one of their more controversial employees has strong ties to SBI and Kotaku.
We shall see. If CDPR assures the launch of their next game isn't a buggy mess of Cyberpunk proportions, I don't see them failing, but only the future will tell.Given that this was a company that had amassed a significant amount of good will over the years it is unlikely they will reach that point again. They've chosen to double down rather than reverse course and the market and consumers will react accordingly.
The trilogy will most likely be focused on Ciri, they won't change horses halfway through a journey.The leftist cucks will never admit defeat by returning to Geralt. Next witcher game will either let you make your own witcher of either sex or have a preset male and female witcher (which might still be Ciri).So when Bitcher 4 underperforms, what's it gonna be?
- DLC/Expansion where you play as Geralt
- Announce Witcher 5 super quickly where Geralt returns
Oh, so that's why all those Tomb Raider games failed spectacularly...Nah. It's lost much of the 'cool factor'. The primary target audience for medieval fantasy RPG's is men. Of those, a significant portion prefer to play as a cool guy rather than a woman.
Unless it actually influences game's story or design, few people will care about the inner workings of a corporation. Most CDPR audience is not composed of chronically online clients of rage-baiters.Add in the complete mess the company is in due to doubling down on ESG/DEI and that further erodes interest.
All DAV marketing materials posted online were ratioed into oblivion. This is not the case with previevs for the Witcher 4. There's totally different energy around this title. Outside of some youtube rage merchants who need next fodder, because their 107th video about Veilguard doesn't get as many views as the previous ones and nobody (including Obsidian, it seems) cares about Avowed.The game will sell decently but of those who do buy it, a lot will openly mock it if it has anything even remotely similar to Taash from Dragon Age: Veilguard.
literally nobody who knows the source material was surprised by this announcement. You're grasping now.Given that they've already confirmed that Ciri will be able to partake of 'non-traditional romances' then that is highly likely.
there was no official statement, simlly a responce to a comment on X:The company is currently in full on damage control. Putting out panicked statements about not working with Sweet Baby Inc
https://x.com/michalnowakow/status/1877352249199894610?s=19
Fake news like the ones about CDPR working with SBI need to be quickly addressed since there is not fact-checking on this portal
CDPR hires what, 1000+ employees and also works with thousands of contractors. There will always be some bad apples. However the question is the degree they can influence the project.or even knowing what the consultancy company is until recently. Naturally the comments were brutal, proving that it was a lie by linking the company's own creepy videos expressing their commitment to DEI/ESG as well as pointing out that one of their more controversial employees has strong ties to SBI and Kotaku.
We shall see. If CDPR assures the launch of their next game isn't a buggy mess of Cyberpunk proportions, I don't see them failing, but only the future will tell.Given that this was a company that had amassed a significant amount of good will over the years it is unlikely they will reach that point again. They've chosen to double down rather than reverse course and the market and consumers will react accordingly.