But this is true.Checkpoint saves are superior to save anywhere. Save anywhere is basically the inherent cheat code in PC gaming.
But this is true.Checkpoint saves are superior to save anywhere. Save anywhere is basically the inherent cheat code in PC gaming.
But this is true.Checkpoint saves are superior to save anywhere. Save anywhere is basically the inherent cheat code in PC gaming.
But this is true.Checkpoint saves are superior to save anywhere. Save anywhere is basically the inherent cheat code in PC gaming.
You mean you actually enjoy repeating 30 minutes of content because the end-boss beat you by one hit-point cos your phone rang...
what is the pause button
Ok, invent another scenario where you fuck up on one minor detail which doesn't involve an amusing event. Whatthefuckever, do you like needlessly repeating content because the game forces you too? I guess you'd be ok with a long unskippable cutscene before retrying an encounter?
If only you were playing a turn-based game, you pleb.because the end-boss beat you by one hit-point cos your phone rang...
If only you were playing a turn-based game, you pleb.because the end-boss beat you by one hit-point cos your phone rang...
But it's turn-based game.But this is true.Checkpoint saves are superior to save anywhere. Save anywhere is basically the inherent cheat code in PC gaming.
You mean you actually enjoy repeating 30 minutes of content because the end-boss beat you by one hit-point cos your phone rang...
If the content is good then yeah why wouldn't I want to play more of it? If the content is not good, why are you playing that crappy game in the first place?But this is true.Checkpoint saves are superior to save anywhere. Save anywhere is basically the inherent cheat code in PC gaming.
You mean you actually enjoy repeating 30 minutes of content because the end-boss beat you by one hit-point cos your phone rang...
“If there was something for the original Baldur’s Gate that just doesn’t mesh for modern day gamers like the sexism, [we tried to address that],” said writer Amber Scott. “In the original there’s a lot of jokes at women’s expense. Or if not a lot, there’s a couple, like Safana was just a sex object in BG 1, and Jaheira was the nagging wife and that was played for comedy. We were able to say, ‘No, that’s not really the kind of story we want to make.’ In Siege of Dragonspear, Safana gets her own little storyline, she got a way better personality upgrade. If people don’t like that, then too bad.”
If the content is good then yeah why wouldn't I want to play more of it? If the content is not good, why are you playing that crappy game in the first place?
RPGs were a mistake.
RPGs were a mistake.
Don't say that. Lots of people love RPG games.
There is also decent and meh in the middle, and if its decent I don't mind having to replay a mission or whatever. If it is so crap that I couldn't stand to replay the last 30 minutes of it, then I wouldn't be wasting my life on something so shit. Get some standards, and stop buying bad games, you big enablers.If the content is good then yeah why wouldn't I want to play more of it? If the content is not good, why are you playing that crappy game in the first place?
Are you one of those people who think games can only be on the following spectrum:
Unplayably crap ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Fucking awesome
With nothing in between?