So does this have a good story inside the extremely faggoty presentation?
Black Mage Sion is good but later on, at least on the highest difficulty and challenge mode, battle mage is just straight up bonkers. Which is incidentally why I think that post has merit. In Melee, Irene and Sion just kick Albus' ass in every way.
If you don't know what they mean by Albus' squishyness, you simply haven't read their abilities. Odds are, you have Albus in better gear (i.e. more dodge chance) than Irene and Sion. If you look only at their masteries, Sion and Irene get a TON of damage reduction and defense, where Albus doesn't get all that much.
Albus defense comes from blocking, not dodging. He also has a far more aggressive fighting style. GS masteries provide bonuses to block whenever Albus attacks.
So does this have a good story inside the extremely faggoty presentation?
So does this have a good story inside the extremely faggoty presentation?
read the last 10 pages or so. Some people say yes - a fact that will never fail to amaze me. It is among the worst stories I can recall sufflering through. Not that it matters in the slightest - you play this one for the gameplay
So does this have a good story inside the extremely faggoty presentation?
read the last 10 pages or so. Some people say yes - a fact that will never fail to amaze me. It is among the worst stories I can recall sufflering through. Not that it matters in the slightest - you play this one for the gameplay
To put it simply, spoonism is an idea of a better society. Life in Valhalla sucks, so people search for someplace where they will be treated like people.
Since this game infected me with a healthy dose of passion (or an unhealthy dose of autism), in one of my playthroughs, I wrote down the truth of the spoonism. Let me share them with you.
'Never be full with the first spoon'. In spoonism, first spoon is an intention, second spoon is the result. Don't be satisfied with intention, aim for the result. When spoonist refer to people as 'first spoon', they mean the group that created the opportunity for them to gather. The second spoon are those people who will reach 'land of feast' (build korean communism).
'Your spoon may be different from mine, but we share the same bowl'. It is a beautiful way to say 'respectfully disagree'.
'Don't seek truths hidden behind masks'. Your past doesn't matter, we will treat you like a brother if you will help our cause.
'Only the hungry one can eat'. If you have a desire to do something, you will do it. Without a desire, you will do nothing.
'Those who lose their turf will suffer for as long as they live'. If you betray your ideals, you will suffer.
'Those who undergo hard times with you are your brothers'. brothers? comrades? Communism!!!
'When 10 people each give up a spoon full of their bowl of rice, they can make a new bowl of rice'. Communal property. Communism!!!
When you play this game long enough, not only spoonism stops being retarded, you start to understand spoonism as an idea and you start to understand what spoonists say. And sometimes they have a point.
So does this have a good story inside the extremely faggoty presentation?
So does this have a good story inside the extremely faggoty presentation?
read the last 10 pages or so. Some people say yes - a fact that will never fail to amaze me. It is among the worst stories I can recall sufflering through. Not that it matters in the slightest - you play this one for the gameplay
okay I will
To put it simply, spoonism is an idea of a better society. Life in Valhalla sucks, so people search for someplace where they will be treated like people.
Since this game infected me with a healthy dose of passion (or an unhealthy dose of autism), in one of my playthroughs, I wrote down the truth of the spoonism. Let me share them with you.
'Never be full with the first spoon'. In spoonism, first spoon is an intention, second spoon is the result. Don't be satisfied with intention, aim for the result. When spoonist refer to people as 'first spoon', they mean the group that created the opportunity for them to gather. The second spoon are those people who will reach 'land of feast' (build korean communism).
'Your spoon may be different from mine, but we share the same bowl'. It is a beautiful way to say 'respectfully disagree'.
'Don't seek truths hidden behind masks'. Your past doesn't matter, we will treat you like a brother if you will help our cause.
'Only the hungry one can eat'. If you have a desire to do something, you will do it. Without a desire, you will do nothing.
'Those who lose their turf will suffer for as long as they live'. If you betray your ideals, you will suffer.
'Those who undergo hard times with you are your brothers'. brothers? comrades? Communism!!!
'When 10 people each give up a spoon full of their bowl of rice, they can make a new bowl of rice'. Communal property. Communism!!!
When you play this game long enough, not only spoonism stops being retarded, you start to understand spoonism as an idea and you start to understand what spoonists say. And sometimes they have a point.
So does this have a good story inside the extremely faggoty presentation?
Sykar said:I do not think anyone thinks that they story is "good".
Zumbabul said:The story is good
Sykar said:I do not think anyone thinks that they story is "good".
Zumbabul said:The story is good
So does this have a good story inside the extremely faggoty presentation?
The story is good, but you will not get it. It is told in such a way, that after you finish the game, you will have no idea what is going on. For example, the very first mission has references to the events that will happen in chapters 2, 3, 4, and 6. And the whole game is like this. As a result, the majority of players think that the story is shit. And this is not their fault. After I finished the game the first time, I also thought that the story is shit. I started the second run, and I was genuinely surprised that the game has story at all and that it is actually good.
The main value of this game is awesome tactical combat and excellent build porn. The story is something extra. A lot of people don't even acknowledge the existence of the story, but they still like the game.
I believe it's what they call "nonlinear" storytelling
Sykar said:I do not think anyone thinks that they story is "good".
Zumbabul said:The story is good
I believe it's what they call "nonlinear" storytelling
this thread whenever story is brought up:
Has anyone been able to make it through the second VHPD training mission on Cruel difficulty, the mission wherein you're left with Giselle and another non-ESPer character of your choice to defend against the rest of your team with VHPD backup? With my current setup I cannot possibly imagine doing it if not through cheating by just taking off all the equipment and masteries on the opposing characters and lowering the difficulty to Normal or lower.
This guys is a prolific uploader for Troubleshooter stuff:
Not sure how good his build are since I am just around the corner to level 40 but it seems his builds seem well thought out.
But why not use a decent art style and tell an interesting story (or no story at all, if it's about the gameplay) instead of this shit?
If your Giselle is as deadly as mine it's a piece of cake. I chose Kylie as her backup to create distraction clones but really a correctly built Giselle could probably solo it.Has anyone been able to make it through the second VHPD training mission on Cruel difficulty, the mission wherein you're left with Giselle and another non-ESPer character of your choice to defend against the rest of your team with VHPD backup? With my current setup I cannot possibly imagine doing it if not through cheating by just taking off all the equipment and masteries on the opposing characters and lowering the difficulty to Normal or lower (although I'm too lazy to do it, maybe there are other ways to cheese this mission).
But why not use a decent art style and tell an interesting story (or no story at all, if it's about the gameplay) instead of this shit?
The degenerates here don't even realise anymore how pathetic this 'art style' is.
And Pulp Fiction is also pretty shit btw. It has cool art direction, but the story and presentation are just bad. With bad actors and worse direction, nobody would remember it. Like nobody remembers Reservoir Dogs, which is the better movie overall btw. But I'm talking to weaboo losers, so all hope is lost. Downvote me, kiddos.
The gameplay may be great, but the art is so degenerate that no amount of virgins could convince me to try this.