Squawking about Stillbirth not being an X game (although EGOSOFT, creators and developers of the X series, called it an X game and billed it as one, too) is essentially a red herring. Even when the title is disregarded and the software is judged objectively from the viewpoint of someone who's never played an X game, as was the case with most of the Steam reviews of its initial release, it's still a shitty game, period—as an X game, as a space game, and as a plain old game game.
Its an X-Game as in "it shares the same universe and some of the basic premises (fly around, trade, fight, build up an economy), but it is not an X4, as in "a spiritual succesor to X3" and it wasn't marketed as such.
About the only thing that Rebirth and the old games are now apart are
- The ability to fly multiple ships
- Crew personal you have (had) to hire on board of stations.
- Total sector size.
Most former mandatory on-station interactions are already not mandatory anymore and the small rest can be modded out.
So, either multi-ships and sector count is the sole defining factor for you to define a good space game.
Or you are just rambling around nonsense to avoid reevaluating your first impression at all cost.
Which would sorta be fitting.
If you've reached that point and don't like ED or FreeSpace 2 with mods and texture packs, realistically you should just give up trying to play a space game and play different games instead.
Eheheheh.
I'd rather play Darkstar One (and that was one retarded popamole game) instead of wasting time in anything outside of the Arenemode of ED.
"Eurotrucker in Space" is an insult to Eurotrucker, i have never ever encountered something which shoves so many hours of pure boringness into your face.
They are incredibly biased, and HoL in no way salvages Stillbirth from being an incredibly shitty game.
"Biased" is huge steaming pile of nonsense in the context of gaming preferences.
Your sentence basically boils down to "They are biased, because they don't share my opinion".
On which basis are you even arguing?
You haven't played HoL, same goes for TO, probably, so any talk from you about the lack of improvement is basically crystal-ball gazing.
Earlier, you said your Egosoft account is now something over a decade old (so you most likely registered around the time of X2), yet you talk about Egosoft like somebody who barely played the games.
Anybody with more than a minimum of time investment in the series should/would know that V1.0 of their games is always crap.
The Goldmaster of Terran Conflict was an unplayable bugfest, Albion Prelude was a lackluster sandbox without much plot and you basically tied if you only ever came near something that had missiles onboard.
A few patches later, the games turned into something fun.
Anyways, this discussion is really going nowhere.
You seem to have a peculiar taste that seems to be incompatible with the current X Game and most likely the older ones to, combined with a "never-admit-fault" attitude that makes arguing a waste of time.
I'd recommend everybody who is unsure whether its worth to buy to sort the steam reviews on the base game to show them chronologicaly and then read the negative ones while keeping the hours played by them in mind.
Or just try it out yourself, the Demo is supposedly updated to 4.0 RC1.