Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 Early Access Thread [GAME RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

[Reinhardt]

Here is my poorly made meme to trigger Larian cultists.

counterpoint

Already see 10 characters to kill on sight.

 

[Volourn]

What is up with Camellia other than having a name that sounds like some sort of 1700ss disease. She looks quite normal. So, obviously, they bullshtted her up in another wayL0L

 

[Efe]

play and find out

 

[Volourn]

When it is released in 5 years, maybe.

 

[Zeriel]

The amount of points was never the problem it was their retarded distribution and the choices for subclasses.

Owlcat optimized their encounters for rollplaying and gave you characters statted for role-playing.

You know you can just make all your own characters right?

It was a fair criticism in Kingmaker before they added mercs being advisors, but after it's totally on you the player for being so autistically retarded over something they give you a million options to fix.

 

[Reinhardt]

Bro, just ignore it! If you close your eyes it will go away! Worked so well everytime!

 

[Zeriel]

What is up with Camellia other than having a name that sounds like some sort of 1700ss disease. She looks quite normal. So, obviously, they bullshtted her up in another wayL0L

She's actually probably the 2nd most interesting of all the companions I've seen in the beta. Regill is #1 of course.

 

[Yosharian]

The amount of points was never the problem it was their retarded distribution and the choices for subclasses.

Owlcat optimized their encounters for rollplaying and gave you characters statted for role-playing.

You know you can just make all your own characters right?

It was a fair criticism in Kingmaker before they added mercs being advisors, but after it's totally on you the player for being so autistically retarded over something they give you a million options to fix.

Exactly, I mean they only have a -4 penalty to their rolls, equivalent to an 8-point penalty to the relevant ability score.

 

[Efe]

you can always reduce kingdom difficulty to make up for it.

 

[His Dudeness]

Is the game still a skin for divinity original sin 2?

 

[Black]

Here is my poorly made meme to trigger Larian cultists.

This is like watching a cripple fight but they're both trannies and black.

 

[rusty_shackleford]

Wrath trannies keep coming to this thread because they're still trying to cope with this shit

 

[underground nymph]

Orifices gffdddf. Fffftf

Wrath trannies keep coming to this thread because they're still trying to cope with this shit

This is in fact what Victor expects the most from WOTR.

 

[Bah]

То be fair, those ratings are probably from the start of the game when it was bugged up the butt.

What's unfair about judging a game as released by the developer? If they decided to pursue shekels instead of quality, that's their own fault.

 

[Ontopoly]

То be fair, those ratings are probably from the start of the game when it was bugged up the butt.

What's unfair about judging a game as released by the developer? If they decided to pursue shekels instead of quality, that's their own fault.

It just means the review is no longer accurate or indicative of the quality of the game at this moment. That's a big deal. If the game sucked at one point (it didn't, but if it did) but is all fixed now and has a higher recent score, then it's not really accurate to use that number to judge the quality of the game as it is right now. Anybody looking at that score right now and thinking of buying the game is not going to have to deal with a ton of the shit that made up those 5/10s.

 

[Bah]

То be fair, those ratings are probably from the start of the game when it was bugged up the butt.

What's unfair about judging a game as released by the developer? If they decided to pursue shekels instead of quality, that's their own fault.

It just means the review is no longer accurate or indicative of the quality of the game at this moment. That's a big deal. If the game sucked at one point (it didn't, but if it did) but is all fixed now and has a higher recent score, then it's not really accurate to use that number to judge the quality of the game as it is right now. Anybody looking at that score right now and thinking of buying the game is not going to have to deal with a ton of the shit that made up those 5/10s.

Developers deserve to be punished with respect to sales for releasing buggy games. This is what they deserve.

 

[rusty_shackleford]

BASED and REDPILLED russian developers are creating a game for trannies, yet the tranny lovers spend all their time in the BG3 thread, how curious!

 

[rusty_shackleford]

BASED and REDPILLED russian developers are creating a game for trannies, yet the tranny lovers spend all their time in the BG3 thread, how curious!

the one on the left is an actual tranny, and that's his orc lover btw. It's essentially the first character you encounter in the BASED and REDPILLED tranny simulator.

 

[NJClaw]

Rusty, how many hands do I need to count the posts you made without using the word "tranny"?

 

[Anonona]

It just means the review is no longer accurate or indicative of the quality of the game at this moment. That's a big deal. If the game sucked at one point (it didn't, but if it did) but is all fixed now and has a higher recent score, then it's not really accurate to use that number to judge the quality of the game as it is right now. Anybody looking at that score right now and thinking of buying the game is not going to have to deal with a ton of the shit that made up those 5/10s.

It seems the scores are roughly the same in Steam and metacritic for the enhanced edition. (though it should be noted that in the case of metacritic it is only for the console version)

 

[rusty_shackleford]

which way, rpg man?

 

[Ontopoly]

which way, rpg man?

Oh no! Spooky black people. Protect me daddy Swen.

 

[Delterius]

То be fair, those ratings are probably from the start of the game when it was bugged up the butt.

What's unfair about judging a game as released by the developer? If they decided to pursue shekels instead of quality, that's their own fault.

It just means the review is no longer accurate or indicative of the quality of the game at this moment. That's a big deal. If the game sucked at one point (it didn't, but if it did) but is all fixed now and has a higher recent score, then it's not really accurate to use that number to judge the quality of the game as it is right now. Anybody looking at that score right now and thinking of buying the game is not going to have to deal with a ton of the shit that made up those 5/10s.

Developers deserve to be punished with respect to sales for releasing buggy games. This is what they deserve.

'do i fit in now you guys'

 

[Bah]

То be fair, those ratings are probably from the start of the game when it was bugged up the butt.

What's unfair about judging a game as released by the developer? If they decided to pursue shekels instead of quality, that's their own fault.

It just means the review is no longer accurate or indicative of the quality of the game at this moment. That's a big deal. If the game sucked at one point (it didn't, but if it did) but is all fixed now and has a higher recent score, then it's not really accurate to use that number to judge the quality of the game as it is right now. Anybody looking at that score right now and thinking of buying the game is not going to have to deal with a ton of the shit that made up those 5/10s.

Developers deserve to be punished with respect to sales for releasing buggy games. This is what they deserve.

'do i fit in now you guys'

I've been saying this since I paid for that buggy piece of shit and it was broken for almost a full year.

 

[Delterius]

'Hey what do you think of <game>?'

'I'm still butthurt because it was buggy back in 2003.'

Do I look like I'm your proctologist or something? I don't care, lmao.