FriendlyMerchant
Guest
First Solasta and then Larian. Very progressive.
Is there a word for this thing you do where you go around making shitty posts in every thread you can find?You lost this battle years ago, how long are you going to cry about it?You could also not put tranny garbage into the game, and make one with male and female characters.This is a dumb shit take. It would be more work to put something in where they specifically misgender you as opposed to just having a variable that agrees with the player's choice like it would for anyone else.
canadianIs there a word for this thing you do where you go around making shitty posts in every thread you can find?You lost this battle years ago, how long are you going to cry about it?You could also not put tranny garbage into the game, and make one with male and female characters.This is a dumb shit take. It would be more work to put something in where they specifically misgender you as opposed to just having a variable that agrees with the player's choice like it would for anyone else.
Both are using 5E, so it's to be expected.First Solasta and then Larian. Very progressive.
1e is too modern. We need to return to TRADITION. 1E or nothing.Both are using 5E, so it's to be expected.First Solasta and then Larian. Very progressive.
I'm telling you guys, we must return to 2E. It's the only way.
According to the GOG FAQ it was 30 days.EA. Not the same. You play for more than 2 hours and you're done.
If it's a preorder, shouldn't you be able to refund it?Man, D&D is massively gay anymore. I wish I didn't have this sick compulsion to drunkenly pre-order every piece of shit that I hear about. I'll be able to stop next time, right?
*2e is too modern, you mean.1e is too modern. We need to return to TRADITION. 1E or nothing.
I would be fine with returning to 1e, or a hybrid, but I would miss stuff like the Planescape setting if it were pure 1e.
I also wouldn't mind a 2.5E, similar to BG, where they brought in things like sorcerers from 3e, and things like assassins back from 1e (or from the thief handbook or whatever).
Balance is boring. Just give them an XP penalty or something.In a setting where getting a single magic scroll is extremely hard to find, rare and expensive, they would be too op for that setting.
I really don't understand the licensing scheme for D&D. I know that 3.5e had some kind of more open license that enabled Paizo to make Wokefinder, but I guess it doesn't apply to 2E?But woketards would NEVER give license to a 2E game.
In regard to Solasta, the only justification the developers would have for using the "5E D&D" rules is it was a necessary requirement for obtaining the license for the Dragonlance setting that they so obviously coveted. Since they weren't able to obtain that Dragonlance license, they lack any valid reason for relying on the "5E D&D" rules (which they don't even have the official license for) rather than a modified version ("retroclone") of the AD&D 1E or 2E rules.But woketards would NEVER give license to a 2E game.
The closest thing that we could have is a retroclone adapted into a CRPG. At best, we could get an retroclone.
Pierre Begue nigga, not hard.Not sure if there's another developer of fantasy CRPGs focused on turn-based, tactical combat that might have use for a retroclone D&D/AD&D ruleset.
Imagine being in charge of translating from English to any romance/latin language(Italian, French, Spanish, Portuguese), this languages are extremely gendered.
I would be fine with returning to 1e, or a hybrid, but I would miss stuff like the Planescape setting if it were pure 1e.
I also wouldn't mind a 2.5E, similar to BG, where they brought in things like sorcerers from 3e, and things like assassins back from 1e (or from the thief handbook or whatever).
Assassins are ok, sorcerers depends on the setting. In a setting where getting a single magic scroll is extremely hard to find, rare and expensive, they would be too op for that setting.
But woketards would NEVER give license to a 2E game.
The closest thing that we could have is a retroclone adapted into a CRPG. At best, we could get an retroclone.
it doesn't mean you have to pay for it or consoom it.it aint going away folks, might as well get used to it
I know that 3.5e had some kind of more open license that enabled Paizo to make Wokefinder, but I guess it doesn't apply to 2E?
ey retroactively added a disclaimer to the shop for all their old products basically renouncing everything from the 90s and before? It's funny and sad.
it aint going away folks, might as well get used to it, however much it grinds yours and my gears.
Don't care. Still degenerate. Still gonna complain about it.And it's an RPG, you know what that means? ROLE PLAYING, if trannies want their pronous let them, nobody is forcing you to use or even see that sh*t.
So far, it's this and possibly the demon companion, if it turns out to be a tranny. No confirmation on that though.So when does Mr Shekelford create a "DOS3 cringe compilation thread"
being offended by identity politics in games in 2022..
lol. where the hell have u guys been these past 5 years.
it aint going away folks, might as well get used to it, however much it grinds yours and my gears.
Codex still crying about a completely optional thing.
And it's an RPG, you know what that means? ROLE PLAYING, if trannies want their pronous let them, nobody is forcing you to use or even see that sh*t.
I need those extra points from woke game reviewers
"Just ignore it and it'll go away!" ---> "Don't like it, don't buy it!" ---> "It's not going away, chud!" ---> "Suck the femine penis or else...!"being offended by identity politics in games in 2022..
lol. where the hell have u guys been these past 5 years.
it aint going away folks, might as well get used to it, however much it grinds yours and my gears.
Who or what is displaying mental illness in BG3? It's just a stupid OPTIONAL prompt when creating a character.Codex still crying about a completely optional thing.
And it's an RPG, you know what that means? ROLE PLAYING, if trannies want their pronous let them, nobody is forcing you to use or even see that sh*t.
I need those extra points from woke game reviewers
It's not "optional". If someone displays mental illness, I'm forced to assume that impinges on everything else they produce and think too. This is not some minor disagreement over economic distribution. It's either a complete inability to comprehend material reality, or worse, a rank cowardice where you pretend you are mentally ill but aren't actually.
The fans, the developers.Who or what is displaying mental illness in BG3?