Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 Early Access Thread [GAME RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

AwesomeButton

AwesomeButton

Proud owner of BG 3: Day of Swen's Tentacle
Patron
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Messages
17,106
Location
At large
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath
AwesomeButton said:
Percy said:
Creating a Drow non-Human Paladin should be a bannable offence.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

I got an idea from this.

One of my Paladin's missions will be to root out false paladins, especially those of a non-Human race. I will try to kill every Paladin NPC who isn't Human.

In fact, given the state of WotC, of D&D, Larian writing, and the burden of the BG legacy on BG3 in terms of cringe, we should start a list of "Based Achievements".

Add more as you come up with them.




Gradenmayer said:
AwesomeButton said:
I was considering between Cleric and Paladin, and I'll go with a Paladin fanatic with no understanding of moral nuance and a simplistic black and white worldview. Let's see how the game handles such a character.
Click to expand...
Isn’t that just Oath Of Vengeance, which will be added on release? Don’t think it will struggle in handling it.
Click to expand...
Still depends on how you want to RP it.
 
Fedora Master

Fedora Master

STOP POSTING
Patron
Edgy
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Messages
31,774
97c42c88-a23d-42f4-b9a4-9a8b0283d031_text.gif


I guess in nuDnD nothing fucking matters anyway, reflecting the disposition of their target audience.
 
BruceVC

BruceVC

Magister
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
9,931
Location
South Africa, Cape Town
whydoibother said:
Barbarian said:
Funny that Drizzt the snowflake ended up being the reason for a whole population of "good" drow.
Click to expand...
The reason is: Can you imagine a "good drow"? If you can imagine it, why can't you play it? No good reason.
In general, restrictions are removed when homebrewing, not added. That's where the community drags things towards.
Click to expand...
But there is lore about this, "good " drow reject Lolth and follow other gods

Its not that hard to understand
 

notpl

Arbiter
Joined
Dec 6, 2021
Messages
1,634
Gradenmayer said:
notpl said:
Fedora Master said:
Drow Paladin is about as "legal" as Drow Ranger.
They're Chaotic Evil. Lolth is Chaotic Evil. What's the ONE thing that defines Paladins? Their adherence to a fucking code, which means lawfulness.
Click to expand...
Paladins are just religious warriors. If there are chaotic evil gods, there should be chaotic evil paladins. It was always stupid.
Click to expand...
Those are clerics.

Paladins need lawfulness to adhere to their oaths.
Main power source is their oath, not the god.
Click to expand...
If "Chaotic" means "cannot adhere to oaths" (I say "if" because the law/chaos axis has never really meant anything) then it is a stupid descriptor and it is good that it was done away with.
 
Fedora Master

Fedora Master

STOP POSTING
Patron
Edgy
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Messages
31,774
notpl said:
If "Chaotic" means "cannot adhere to oaths"
Click to expand...
Yes it does.
The only reason Drow society doesn't collapse into infighting like an Arab nation is Lolth actively intervening and curbing the worst excesses. This is a fact of the FR lore.
 
whydoibother

whydoibother

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
17,451
Location
bulgaristan
Codex Year of the Donut
BruceVC said:
whydoibother said:
Barbarian said:
Funny that Drizzt the snowflake ended up being the reason for a whole population of "good" drow.
Click to expand...
The reason is: Can you imagine a "good drow"? If you can imagine it, why can't you play it? No good reason.
In general, restrictions are removed when homebrewing, not added. That's where the community drags things towards.
Click to expand...
But there is lore about this, "good " drow reject Lolth and follow other gods

Its not that hard to understand
Click to expand...
Its kind of like World of Warcraft, which has "good" undead. The forsaken are undead who reject the Lich King hivemind. Bit dodgy lore wise, but its declared to be true and possible, and its cool to have.
 
AwesomeButton

AwesomeButton

Proud owner of BG 3: Day of Swen's Tentacle
Patron
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Messages
17,106
Location
At large
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath
whydoibother said:
Barbarian said:
Funny that Drizzt the snowflake ended up being the reason for a whole population of "good" drow.
Click to expand...
The reason is: Can you imagine a "good drow"? If you can imagine it, why can't you play it? No good reason.
In general, restrictions are removed when homebrewing, not added. That's where the community drags things towards.
Click to expand...
If you can imagine a good drow, this means just one thing - you don't know the setting.

Since fewer and fewer people know the setting as the player base widens, restrictions are gradually removed. Until there are no more rules and no more restrictions - everything is left to homebrew. At which point one asks - why even have a D&D system? Don't answer, I know - in order to have a *product* to *sell*.

What about the minority who actually want to abide by the restrictions and actually read up on the setting? Well, they can impose the restrictions back, on their table. This can work fine in TT, but when it comes to a PC adaptation, we are all getting the same game in the end. And people are upset.
 
jaekl

jaekl

CHUD LIFE
Patron
Joined
May 1, 2023
Messages
1,657
Location
Canada
You know what? Maybe beholders aren't actually all bad after all... we just need to do better with our *communication skills* - they can't all be bad apples!

Now what hole are you supposed to fuck on one of these things...?
 
Zayne

Zayne

Scholar
Joined
Feb 13, 2018
Messages
129
Location
Yekaterinburg
Shaki said:
Like, let's cut the Firkraag questline from BG2, but instead you can play as Jaheira, get some different dialogue options, and her companion quest is bigger? I don't think it's a good trade.
Click to expand...
But what if you could play as Imoen and get a choice to side with Bodhi?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom