turkishronin
Arcane
C&C isn't important.
As I discovered, Mizora's and Wyll's questline will start to play out at the end of Act II, even if Wyll has been a corpse in the player's camp since early in Act I.Mizora is a fun character true. Good thing is you don't have to engage at all with wyll after recruiting or take him in your party and his ''quest'' will play out normally.
So what's the point of role playing and making decisions? Might as well just have a story game without decisionsC&C isn't important.
Getting Minthara on top of getting rid of these is a win-win. And the fact she isn't a special snowflake mouthing off about her problems is actually an improvement.Karla wyll and you kill halsin so 3 companions
I don't usually write "I fixed it for you", but I fixed it for you.Female Drowsorcerer makes as much sense as female Drow Paladin. Zero.
Remember when sorcerer wasn't a class? Better times.I don't usually write "I fixed it for you", but I fixed it for you.Female Drowsorcerer makes as much sense as female Drow Paladin. Zero.
More like D&BThere's a lot of choices in BG3 but I'm not sure if there's too many significant consequences.
C&C? Larian is more concerned with T&A.
Theoretically Halsin is also just a regular druid dude and actually has the levels to back his story up when he finally joins the party unlike the rest. Shame he's a fag and a creep (leaving him alone with that kid was probably a bad idea).Getting Minthara on top of getting rid of these is a win-win. And the fact she isn't a special snowflake mouthing off about her problems is actually an improvement.Karla wyll and you kill halsin so 3 companions
They got the Duergar completely wrong.Question:
Not counting Gray Dwarves, how many dwarves that roughly fit the fantasy stereotype are in the game?
One?
Guys, seriously, help me out with it.
I'm not saying dwarves have to fit the classic image, I'm just confused... What is a fantasy dwarf in 2023? Short stout human and that's it?
In case you haven't noticed practically ALL the fantasy races in BG 3 (or WotR or Solasta) are just humans that look different. None of them have any distinctive fantasy traits except for appearances. The only exception I can think of were goblins. Funny, mischievous little dudes.Question:
Not counting Gray Dwarves, how many dwarves that roughly fit the fantasy stereotype are in the game?
One?
Guys, seriously, help me out with it.
I'm not saying dwarves have to fit the classic image, I'm just confused... What is a fantasy dwarf in 2023? Short stout human and that's it?
To be 100% fair, being evil in the BG games wasn't earth shattering as far as consequences go. I think I remember this being one of the criticisms aimed at BG II back when it was released. Except maybe having to kill a Silver Dragon.Dragon Age Origins did choice and consequence right. For example if you kill the mages the templars join your army, or if you wipe out the elves you get werewolves instead, etc. Big one near the end of the game is that you can recruit Loghain at the cost of Alistair.
Now look at the choices in BG3, wipe out the tieflings? Lose 3 companions, 4 if you can't convince Gale to stay. Lose quests and vendors, miss out on one of the best pieces of equipment in the game. And in return you get Minthara who is essentially a glorified hireling with bugged dialogue. Kill Nightsong? Everyone in Last Light in gets fucked, lose Jaheira as a companion meaning you also lose Minsc as a companion in act 3. Try to team up with Gortash in act 3? Doesn't matter, gets killed anyway so the game can railroad you back into the way that Larian wants you to play. These aren't choices and consequences, it's you getting fucked over because you dared decided to try and roleplay.
Thats a good thing, people complain that game i easy, and they can play evil and make game harder for themselves last light fight was a lot challenging in my evil playtrough first you kill normies then they all resurrect, and you have to kill them again as zombies its cool then you lose nightsong and you dont have immortal npc in Thorm fight i didnt lost jaheira or minsc i just told jaheira that someone killed Isobel, and she should fight with me, and she joined my camp she only attack or leaves if you tell her that it was you that killed everyone and Mintara has a lot of dialogue anyway her scene when she vows to kill absolute is quite epic a probably better than karlach and wyll whole story combined anyway to many Sawyer fans here with this bullshit balance approach not everything needs to have equal rewardsDragon Age Origins did choice and consequence right. For example if you kill the mages the templars join your army, or if you wipe out the elves you get werewolves instead, etc. Big one near the end of the game is that you can recruit Loghain at the cost of Alistair.
Now look at the choices in BG3, wipe out the tieflings? Lose 3 companions, 4 if you can't convince Gale to stay. Lose quests and vendors, miss out on one of the best pieces of equipment in the game. And in return you get Minthara who is essentially a glorified hireling with bugged dialogue. Kill Nightsong? Everyone in Last Light in gets fucked, lose Jaheira as a companion meaning you also lose Minsc as a companion in act 3. Try to team up with Gortash in act 3? Doesn't matter, gets killed anyway so the game can railroad you back into the way that Larian wants you to play. These aren't choices and consequences, it's you getting fucked over because you dared decided to try and roleplay.
None of that matters. It truly doesn't.From what I've seen Mirantha is actually very popular. Shadow tits was by far the most romanced. The fag/tranny gamer population is wildly over stated. Most gamers are regular dudes. The average gamer is more conservative than the average person definitely
That's the problem with the ESG shit. I mean, in theory, free markets and all that, you'd have developers appealing to their majority audience, which is still mostly straight white males - so you might have some bikini chainmail and a bit of lesbianism between hotties only, but nothing much beyond that (which is what the situation was prior to about the end of the Noughties).
Instead companies are being compensated by investment companies specifically not to appeal to their theoretical natural audience, in fact to demoralize their theoretical natural audience.
That has backfired several times though. Some companies such as Warner and even Disney have literally lost a lot of cash due to wokery.
I can name recent examples even, like the new Indy movie flopping. Or how barely anyone gives a shit about Star Wars anymore.
I don't mind this at all. There might be a lack of additional benefits for some choices, I'll admit that, but the fallout of your actions to be this size in scope is good.Now look at the choices in BG3, wipe out the tieflings? Lose 3 companions, 4 if you can't convince Gale to stay. Lose quests and vendors, miss out on one of the best pieces of equipment in the game. And in return you get Minthara who is essentially a glorified hireling with bugged dialogue. Kill Nightsong? Everyone in Last Light in gets fucked, lose Jaheira as a companion meaning you also lose Minsc as a companion in act 3. Try to team up with Gortash in act 3? Doesn't matter, gets killed anyway so the game can railroad you back into the way that Larian wants you to play. These aren't choices and consequences, it's you getting fucked over because you dared decided to try and roleplay.
That fight was a trash mob fight. Easy fight on Tactician. The only difficulty is if you want to keep Jaheira alive which you might as well not even bother because she's just going to ice storm herself to death anyways (the canon end of her character arc).Thats a good thing, people complain that game i easy, and they can play evil and make game harder for themselves last light fight was a lot challenging in my evil playtrough first you kill normies then they all resurrect, and you have to kill them againDragon Age Origins did choice and consequence right. For example if you kill the mages the templars join your army, or if you wipe out the elves you get werewolves instead, etc. Big one near the end of the game is that you can recruit Loghain at the cost of Alistair.
Now look at the choices in BG3, wipe out the tieflings? Lose 3 companions, 4 if you can't convince Gale to stay. Lose quests and vendors, miss out on one of the best pieces of equipment in the game. And in return you get Minthara who is essentially a glorified hireling with bugged dialogue. Kill Nightsong? Everyone in Last Light in gets fucked, lose Jaheira as a companion meaning you also lose Minsc as a companion in act 3. Try to team up with Gortash in act 3? Doesn't matter, gets killed anyway so the game can railroad you back into the way that Larian wants you to play. These aren't choices and consequences, it's you getting fucked over because you dared decided to try and roleplay.
I'm not talking about fight in the tower you dumb dumb...That fight was a trash mob fight. Easy fight on Tactician. The only difficulty is if you want to keep Jaheira alive which you might as well not even bother because she's just going to ice storm herself to death anyways (the canon end of her character arc).Thats a good thing, people complain that game i easy, and they can play evil and make game harder for themselves last light fight was a lot challenging in my evil playtrough first you kill normies then they all resurrect, and you have to kill them againDragon Age Origins did choice and consequence right. For example if you kill the mages the templars join your army, or if you wipe out the elves you get werewolves instead, etc. Big one near the end of the game is that you can recruit Loghain at the cost of Alistair.
Now look at the choices in BG3, wipe out the tieflings? Lose 3 companions, 4 if you can't convince Gale to stay. Lose quests and vendors, miss out on one of the best pieces of equipment in the game. And in return you get Minthara who is essentially a glorified hireling with bugged dialogue. Kill Nightsong? Everyone in Last Light in gets fucked, lose Jaheira as a companion meaning you also lose Minsc as a companion in act 3. Try to team up with Gortash in act 3? Doesn't matter, gets killed anyway so the game can railroad you back into the way that Larian wants you to play. These aren't choices and consequences, it's you getting fucked over because you dared decided to try and roleplay.
As far as the "best pieces of equipment" mentioned, there's only two or three really worth getting there and it's not a big deal if you can't get them. Besides, you can fix that problem easily:
https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/mods/426?tab=description
It's not cheating because it's your computer therefore your rules. It's roleplaying because the guy only has it because it was left in the forge in the city. No way he's creating all those items in the time it takes to reach his shop given that he should be reaching the city around the same time you do and no way he has the time to make it while traveling. Also Legacy of the Masters is a BG1/BG2 item, it should be available in game to anyone who finds it or it's not in game at all. Besides, not getting those items isn't a big deal.
Sounds like a skill issue on your part. All the fights are extremely easy.I'm not talking about fight in the tower you dumb dumb...That fight was a trash mob fight. Easy fight on Tactician. The only difficulty is if you want to keep Jaheira alive which you might as well not even bother because she's just going to ice storm herself to death anyways (the canon end of her character arc).Thats a good thing, people complain that game i easy, and they can play evil and make game harder for themselves last light fight was a lot challenging in my evil playtrough first you kill normies then they all resurrect, and you have to kill them againDragon Age Origins did choice and consequence right. For example if you kill the mages the templars join your army, or if you wipe out the elves you get werewolves instead, etc. Big one near the end of the game is that you can recruit Loghain at the cost of Alistair.
Now look at the choices in BG3, wipe out the tieflings? Lose 3 companions, 4 if you can't convince Gale to stay. Lose quests and vendors, miss out on one of the best pieces of equipment in the game. And in return you get Minthara who is essentially a glorified hireling with bugged dialogue. Kill Nightsong? Everyone in Last Light in gets fucked, lose Jaheira as a companion meaning you also lose Minsc as a companion in act 3. Try to team up with Gortash in act 3? Doesn't matter, gets killed anyway so the game can railroad you back into the way that Larian wants you to play. These aren't choices and consequences, it's you getting fucked over because you dared decided to try and roleplay.
As far as the "best pieces of equipment" mentioned, there's only two or three really worth getting there and it's not a big deal if you can't get them. Besides, you can fix that problem easily:
https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/mods/426?tab=description
It's not cheating because it's your computer therefore your rules. It's roleplaying because the guy only has it because it was left in the forge in the city. No way he's creating all those items in the time it takes to reach his shop given that he should be reaching the city around the same time you do and no way he has the time to make it while traveling. Also Legacy of the Masters is a BG1/BG2 item, it should be available in game to anyone who finds it or it's not in game at all. Besides, not getting those items isn't a big deal.
The MTG art shit is nasty, look for Bane artHoly shit, what the hell is that face
it's hit or miss, the rest of the gang look okay to me shes the only one fucked up hereThe MTG art shit is nasty, look for Bane artHoly shit, what the hell is that face