- Joined
- Jan 19, 2014
- Messages
- 14,199
Not that I know of, but it always seemed to me like there was mutual respect.
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Cain on Games - Tim Cain's new YouTube channel
- Thread starter Goral
- Start date
Warhawk47
Novice
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2023
- Messages
- 15
I wish he wouldn't keep emphasizing that "everybody" in the industry is a jerkoff just itching to screw you (personally) over. Even if he's right as far as mainstream, west coast devs go, the least he could do is be a bit more positive about turning it around somehow, grass roots or what have you.
As for his comments about "one point fiasco" it underlines my previous point: His experience and skills as a designer and manager are imbalanced. He caved to the majority, directly in contradiction with better overall judgment (which is the role of the designer) and did so at the very end of development when such radical changes to something as essential as core game stats should be anathema (poor management.) If you told Tim to swap out the entire game engine less than 3 months before shipping, he'd tell you to pound sand. As a programmer, he knows that's not only stupid, it's suicidal. Why was his conviction on the design side lacking by comparison? Why did he go with the knee-jerk "solution" anyway? Why not propose (or implement by fiat, because the buck stops there) a compromise solution? Change the sliding scale of increasing point costs, make it cheaper overall, but preserve the exponential increase. Going from exponential to linear isn't a small thing. It would be far easier to iterate this as well, since the established pattern should have been set by previous testing at max "difficulty," giving an upper bound.
He was never trained in business, granted. But it also looks like the logical underpinnings of business decision-making are missing. "Promoted beyond his competence" as the military saying goes. Some part of him seems to admit that, but the remaining ego will not.
As for his comments about "one point fiasco" it underlines my previous point: His experience and skills as a designer and manager are imbalanced. He caved to the majority, directly in contradiction with better overall judgment (which is the role of the designer) and did so at the very end of development when such radical changes to something as essential as core game stats should be anathema (poor management.) If you told Tim to swap out the entire game engine less than 3 months before shipping, he'd tell you to pound sand. As a programmer, he knows that's not only stupid, it's suicidal. Why was his conviction on the design side lacking by comparison? Why did he go with the knee-jerk "solution" anyway? Why not propose (or implement by fiat, because the buck stops there) a compromise solution? Change the sliding scale of increasing point costs, make it cheaper overall, but preserve the exponential increase. Going from exponential to linear isn't a small thing. It would be far easier to iterate this as well, since the established pattern should have been set by previous testing at max "difficulty," giving an upper bound.
He was never trained in business, granted. But it also looks like the logical underpinnings of business decision-making are missing. "Promoted beyond his competence" as the military saying goes. Some part of him seems to admit that, but the remaining ego will not.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2018
- Messages
- 8,643
Fallout 2 and Pillars. Doesn't mean they interacted at all though.
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2017
- Messages
- 856
At least Chris has given a shout out to Tim's channel on different occasions, I think he even posted the Fallout 2 video on his Linkedin page. He must hold a lot of respect for him:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2015
- Messages
- 13,138
Zeriel
Arcane
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2012
- Messages
- 13,969
There's this dynamic where the original creator of something often undervalues it or doesn't care as much about it as people who like it and work on it later. That might explain some of this. CA definitely seemed to respect Fallout, some of the excesses in 2 notwithstanding.
Zeriel
Arcane
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2012
- Messages
- 13,969
Oftentimes it's the result of the culture at the time too. There's only so much you can trust someone's opinion 20-30 years after the fact. The person they were back then would probably stridently disagree with the person they are now.
sosmoflux
Educated
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2022
- Messages
- 353
I found the 1-point dilemma particularly strange because, in real game development, designers are expected to take in information (in his case, the 16 other team members) and then build satisfying solutions that are well designed and appease most peoples' problems.
No doubt he's being reductive to make a fun point for a video or whatever- but it's kind of a self own that the design lead couldn't figure out a solution beyond one he likes and another everyone else likes. Just, like, design something better, man.
No doubt he's being reductive to make a fun point for a video or whatever- but it's kind of a self own that the design lead couldn't figure out a solution beyond one he likes and another everyone else likes. Just, like, design something better, man.
Jedi Master Radek
Arcane
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2013
- Messages
- 4,336
It' s because he managed to successfully switch the ruleset of Fallout few weeks before shipping. It gave him a confidence in making such rapid changes right before shipping.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2018
- Messages
- 8,643
Again demonstrating that 10x more thought went into Fallout 1 than into any of the Bethesda titles.
- Joined
- May 29, 2010
- Messages
- 36,745
Fallout's system wasn't his. That was Chris Taylor's homebrew that he created in high school, Tim's only contribution was adding Luck.
Jedi Master Radek
Arcane
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2013
- Messages
- 4,336
I know that and all problems mentioned concerning doing quick changes to fundamental game mechanics near release still aplpy.
Warhawk47
Novice
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2023
- Messages
- 15
The fact that it wasn't his system is the lynchpin: From the sounds of it, I don't think he'd ever designed and built his own (complicated, multi-faceted) game from the bottom up, from the mechanics and interface to the graphics and marketing fluff. His code-engine "toys" didn't seem to fit this bill. Without that experience, he never ran into the first-hand problem of changing something fundamental and breaking the rest of it. It's as if he discounted mechanics as being "easy" to produce and incidental, focusing everything on fluff content (a balance pass wasn't a priority? That's crazy!) Contrast that to myself or any other current-day dev, indie or hobbyist especially, who almost has no choice but to learn these things. Explains a lot, especially if he took "decades" to learn from the aftermath. If you really want to wax philosophical, consider why it took him that long. But that's something better left to the man himself.
PapaPetro
Guest
Last edited by a moderator:
Late Bloomer
Scholar
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2022
- Messages
- 3,977
Overweight trust fund recipient who barely plays videos games, stumbles through his words talking about game design and gaming.
Jack Of Owls
Arcane
I found the beanie guy's talk and his stumbling over the word stultifying stultifying.
Geomancer86
Literate
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2023
- Messages
- 13
He keeps posting daily and I'm wondering what will happen first, will he run of topics or cool unseen shirts first?
flyingjohn
Arcane
- Joined
- May 14, 2012
- Messages
- 3,199
Harthwain
Magister
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2019
- Messages
- 5,428
I disagree. Statistically speaking you are bound to get SOME good RPGs.
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.