Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Clockwork Revolution - inXile's steampunk time travel first-person action-RPG led by Chad Moore and Jason Anderson

La vie sexuelle

Learned
Joined
Jun 10, 2023
Messages
2,161
Location
La Rochelle

Anyway it's a dumb proposition with a clever looking hat on top, the Victorians actually DID invent a quazi-computer - the aforementioned difference engine, cobbled together from wood and metal cogs - and the reason it never changed their society in any way was because an actual computer needs at least a vacuum tube, or better yet an integrated circuit, to make any difference IRL, and those were only invented a 100 years later. The idea lacks any plausibility, placing a modern-day invention into a technologically incompatible environment, and therefore is stupid and offensive and we should shit on it.

It's like saying "what would happen if Youtube was invented in 1992?" Well nothing would fucking happen coz you can't exactly watch videos over a dial-up can you.
Babbage's difference engine was never actually built in Victorian times, their metalworking technology just wasn't good enough to produce so many gears with the required precision. Babbage's design for an analytical engine, which would have been a general purpose computer, was similarly dead in the water.

The designs are sound, the difference engine has been constructed in recent years and does work. If the Victorians had access to such devices they would have been super useful, but it would have been like computing in the mid 20th century, where regular people would never see an actual computer, only the results.
Mechanical computing machines would be great support for administration, science and mathematic, but would be probably replaced with modern computers when electric was discovered. I think that world would be more different from ours politically than technologically.
 

MLMarkland

Arcane
Developer
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
1,663
Location
Malibu, CA
I will sublicense the genre to Brazil’s largest generator of culture: Mercado Libre.
its argentinean
:0-13:
Thus the Brazilian culture gag. I own stock in $MELI

ML is headquartered in Montevideo, which is basically the same word as my first name.
3E1899DB-34D4-4B01-9BBB-057FED2C55CC.jpeg
 

cvv

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
18,966
Location
Kingdom of Bohemia
Enjoy the Revolution! Another revolution around the sun that is.

Anyway it's a dumb proposition with a clever looking hat on top, the Victorians actually DID invent a quazi-computer - the aforementioned difference engine, cobbled together from wood and metal cogs - and the reason it never changed their society in any way was because an actual computer needs at least a vacuum tube, or better yet an integrated circuit, to make any difference IRL, and those were only invented a 100 years later. The idea lacks any plausibility, placing a modern-day invention into a technologically incompatible environment, and therefore is stupid and offensive and we should shit on it.

It's like saying "what would happen if Youtube was invented in 1992?" Well nothing would fucking happen coz you can't exactly watch videos over a dial-up can you.
Babbage's difference engine was never actually built in Victorian times, their metalworking technology just wasn't good enough to produce so many gears with the required precision. Babbage's design for an analytical engine, which would have been a general purpose computer, was similarly dead in the water.

The designs are sound, the difference engine has been constructed in recent years and does work. If the Victorians had access to such devices they would have been super useful, but it would have been like computing in the mid 20th century, where regular people would never see an actual computer, only the results.
Mechanical computing machines would be great support for administration, science and mathematic, but would be probably replaced with modern computers when electric was discovered. I think that world would be more different from ours politically than technologically.
Yea, that was my point.

Even if a wooden computer was built it'd be way too slow to make any earth-shattering difference. You wouldn't see cog-based robots and other krraaazy inventions in this parallel 19th century.

As it turns out, an actually impactful computer needs electricity and integrated circuits.
 

MLMarkland

Arcane
Developer
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
1,663
Location
Malibu, CA

Anyway it's a dumb proposition with a clever looking hat on top, the Victorians actually DID invent a quazi-computer - the aforementioned difference engine, cobbled together from wood and metal cogs - and the reason it never changed their society in any way was because an actual computer needs at least a vacuum tube, or better yet an integrated circuit, to make any difference IRL, and those were only invented a 100 years later. The idea lacks any plausibility, placing a modern-day invention into a technologically incompatible environment, and therefore is stupid and offensive and we should shit on it.

It's like saying "what would happen if Youtube was invented in 1992?" Well nothing would fucking happen coz you can't exactly watch videos over a dial-up can you.
Babbage's difference engine was never actually built in Victorian times, their metalworking technology just wasn't good enough to produce so many gears with the required precision. Babbage's design for an analytical engine, which would have been a general purpose computer, was similarly dead in the water.

The designs are sound, the difference engine has been constructed in recent years and does work. If the Victorians had access to such devices they would have been super useful, but it would have been like computing in the mid 20th century, where regular people would never see an actual computer, only the results.
Mechanical computing machines would be great support for administration, science and mathematic, but would be probably replaced with modern computers when electric was discovered. I think that world would be more different from ours politically than technologically.
Yea, that was my point.

Even if a wooden computer was built it'd be way too slow to make any earth-shattering difference. You wouldn't see cog-based robots and other krraaazy inventions in this parallel 19th century.

As it turns out, an actually impactful computer needs electricity and integrated circuits.
Howard Huges enters the building things out of wood chat
 

Spectacle

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
8,363

Even if a wooden computer was built it'd be way too slow to make any earth-shattering difference. You wouldn't see cog-based robots and other krraaazy inventions in this parallel 19th century.

As it turns out, an actually impactful computer needs electricity and integrated circuits.
I think you're underestimating how impactful earlier access to computing machines would have been for science and administration. The indirect effects to society would be huge.

You'd never see clockwork robots and such, those won't work without magic. The technology in the Difference Engine actually follows the laws of physics, too bad Inxile didn't take more inspiration from that work. Have they even said anything about what makes the tech in Clockwork Revolution work?
 

La vie sexuelle

Learned
Joined
Jun 10, 2023
Messages
2,161
Location
La Rochelle

Even if a wooden computer was built it'd be way too slow to make any earth-shattering difference. You wouldn't see cog-based robots and other krraaazy inventions in this parallel 19th century.

As it turns out, an actually impactful computer needs electricity and integrated circuits.
I think you're underestimating how impactful earlier access to computing machines would have been for science and administration. The indirect effects to society would be huge.

You'd never see clockwork robots and such, those won't work without magic. The technology in the Difference Engine actually follows the laws of physics, too bad Inxile didn't take more inspiration from that work. Have they even said anything about what makes the tech in Clockwork Revolution work?
Meme magic, as you see on trailers.
 

Zed Duke of Banville

Dungeon Master
Patron
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
13,117
Blade Runner appeared in theaters and, although not itself cyberpunk
uwot
I'd say it's a cyberpunk setting on account of taking place in a highly advanced dystopia, but not a cyberpunk story because Decker works for the establishment until the very end. Mike Pondsmith felt the same way about Deus Ex.
Robots originate in Karel Čapek's play R.U.R. from 1920, meaning this concept long predates cyberpunk and isn't specific it. Similarly, a dystopia with advanced technology is an even older concept (e.g. the story "The Machine Stops" by E.M. Forster from 1909). Blade Runner does not involve either cybernetics modifying the human body or external cybernetics such as the internet (even computer use is quite limited), so isn't "cyber", and relied on a combination of stylish 80s and film noir aesthetics, rather than "punk". Nonetheless, the film had an almost immediate, profound impact on the aesthetics used by cyberpunk writers. Moreover, the protagonist being on the side of the law, even serving corporate authority, was no obstacle either; this is the case for a multitude of cyberpunk stories, and occurs even more frequently in the small amount of cyberpunk representation in film and television.
 

HeatEXTEND

Prophet
Patron
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
4,130
Location
Nedderlent
What about "low life/high tech"? That is the lowest common denominator for cyberpunk, right? The movie certainly exudes that.
 

MLMarkland

Arcane
Developer
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
1,663
Location
Malibu, CA
Blade Runner appeared in theaters and, although not itself cyberpunk
uwot
I'd say it's a cyberpunk setting on account of taking place in a highly advanced dystopia, but not a cyberpunk story because Decker works for the establishment until the very end. Mike Pondsmith felt the same way about Deus Ex.
Robots originate in Karel Čapek's play R.U.R. from 1920, meaning this concept long predates cyberpunk and isn't specific it. Similarly, a dystopia with advanced technology is an even older concept (e.g. the story "The Machine Stops" by E.M. Forster from 1909). Blade Runner does not involve either cybernetics modifying the human body or external cybernetics such as the internet (even computer use is quite limited), so isn't "cyber", and relied on a combination of stylish 80s and film noir aesthetics, rather than "punk". Nonetheless, the film had an almost immediate, profound impact on the aesthetics used by cyberpunk writers. Moreover, the protagonist being on the side of the law, even serving corporate authority, was no obstacle either; this is the case for a multitude of cyberpunk stories, and occurs even more frequently in the small amount of cyberpunk representation in film and television.
A good summation. Cyberpunk is heavily influenced by film noir.
 

Spacer's Nugget

Learned
Patron
Joined
Feb 23, 2021
Messages
442
Strap Yourselves In
I've watched the trailer a bunch of times now, and still I can't get over how underwhelming the game appears to me.

This game by Ukrainian refugees (mostly S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 devs) looks a bit better:

 
Last edited:

Van-d-all

Erudite
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
1,580
Location
Standin' pretty. In this dust that was a city.
"Steampunk" originated with Gibson's Difference Engine, exploring the idea of "What if the Victorians had continued on to invent the computer, and how would this affect their society?".

I'd argue it also died with Difference Engine, because alternate history was an established literary concept at that point and it's clear the term was coined as a marketing play on Gibson's fame as the "father of cyberpunk". They needed to put something on the cover, that's about the extent of effort that went into it.

Difference Engine itself felt like very classic spec fiction to me. Not bad, but certainly not a harbinger of a new subgenre.
The entire assumption to trace steampunk to "The Differential Engine" (who was a split work of Gibson & Sterling) is just a blatant ignorance of works pioneered by Jules Verne and H.G. Wells. The term actually was coined way earlier, by writers like Tim Powers and Kevin Jeter.
  • 1987 K. W. Jeter in Locus Apr. 57/2
    Personally, I think Victorian fantasies are going to be the next big thing, as long as we can come up with a fitting collective term for Powers, Blaylock and myself. Something based on the appropriate technology of that era; like ‘steam-punks’, perhaps.

That said, mechanical calculations were a thing up till '70, as Curta calculators were mass produced up until then. Gibson mentions them in Pattern Recognition.

220px-Curta_-_National_Museum_of_Computing.jpg
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom