Shaded Castle so far it's pretty good, but is the boss just the Bell Bearing Hunter?
If that's the case i won't bother recording it.
Yes, he is. He is about the same difficulty as the 2nd bell bearing hunter in the world. Easier than 3rd and 4th for sure.
Wait, who am I kidding? I hate myself. Cutters have razors, I have you.
My wit
is pretty sharp, thank you for noticing.
So what you are trying to say is that me casually using the term medieval as a catch-all for the period from Dark Ages to Renaissance (as it is also commonly used in games) is equivalent to using a 200 pound metal obelisk for a weapon? Eh?
I implied otherwise when I pointed out that colossal swords are still unrealistic whereas this sort of anachronistic but plausible get-up can still look cool.
So did your implication render the gist of your post meaningless as I already suspected earlier? Were you just using that post as a personal therapy session with the Porkster? Are we just running in circles here, with you admitting your own posts are shit to deny me the opportunity to destroy them using logic? Asking for a friend.
The issue is that you, by implication, purported to be someone who "is into HEMA or history."
I believe we call this shifting the emphasis. But it doesn't really change anything, does it, just more petulant pettiness.
... but also as a way to aggrandize yourself.
Lol, that's quite a stretch there, don't pull something.
And what I am pointing out, and what you are conceding, is that your pedantic interest is strictly superficial and extends to making completely banal statements like "buster swords are pretty dumb."
Well, that could be your purported interpretation of things, but to me, my friend, it sounds like more pettiness from someone who is likely threatened by the fact that I know a lot more about HEMA-type stuff than you. I mean, ffs, you even mistook a longsword for an arming sword.
It is not that there is "one thing" that does not fit, it is that the armor itself does not fit with the accessories (most of which are part of the armor set.) And it is precisely that there are some elements that fit with each other and others that do not that renders something eclectic.
Yes, yes, we've already been over this, out of the bunch of things on the character, some are from medieval period, some are from the slightly later Renaissance period, everyone always jumbles them together in gaming contexts anyway, and yet, you think that's as ridiculous as hoisting around a street sign and using it as a weapon. Surely even someone of your limited intellectual capacity can discern the difference in degrees of "silliness" there.
For the record, the most believable part of your character is the size of his head, which seems very authentic to his player.
See, you are much better at ad hominem attacks. It's when you try to base your arguments on facts that you seem to falter.
My point, if you still don't get it, is that if you try to use the most basic understanding of a topic to immediately abandon any humility and bore the world with pedantry, there will always be someone who is even more of an insufferable pedant than you out there ready to do the same to you.
Oh, I misunderstood. I thought your point was to provide me with a farm animal to produce glorious tears of butthurt. Keep 'em flowing, sparky.