Severian Silk
Guest
I for one will wholeheartedly support a new M&M MMO!
(Munches from bag of Doritos Ubisoft supplied me with.)
(Munches from bag of Doritos Ubisoft supplied me with.)
8 was better than 6 or 7 ; )Let's just settle that everything after 5 was progressively worse.
I actually bought 7 on GoG last night, played through the whole starting island and wondered how I was able to stomach this when I was a kid. The difference in quality between 1-5 and 6-8 is unbelievable. It's a totally different series.
What OS did you play it on? Isn't windows 95/98 required? That's one reason I've almost never tried to replay MM6/7/8. It's pretty much the only reason I would need Win98.
Dungeons, atmosphere, style 6>7
Skills, combat, open world 7>6
It ran fine, I just thought the game wasn't that great. I didn't think it was that great as a kid (World of Xeen's where it's at) but I didn't remember it being this tedious, ugly and repetitive. I don't care how much content a game has when it's all the same and when it's not too great to begin with.8 was better than 6 or 7 ; )Let's just settle that everything after 5 was progressively worse.
I actually bought 7 on GoG last night, played through the whole starting island and wondered how I was able to stomach this when I was a kid. The difference in quality between 1-5 and 6-8 is unbelievable. It's a totally different series.
What OS did you play it on? Isn't windows 95/98 required? That's one reason I've almost never tried to replay MM6/7/8. It's pretty much the only reason I would need Win98.
Maybe it will have Arcomage. ;_;
It ran fine, I just thought the game wasn't that great. I didn't think it was that great as a kid (World of Xeen's where it's at) but I didn't remember it being this tedious, ugly and repetitive. I don't care how much content a game has when it's all the same and when it's not too great to begin with.8 was better than 6 or 7 ; )Let's just settle that everything after 5 was progressively worse.
I actually bought 7 on GoG last night, played through the whole starting island and wondered how I was able to stomach this when I was a kid. The difference in quality between 1-5 and 6-8 is unbelievable. It's a totally different series.
What OS did you play it on? Isn't windows 95/98 required? That's one reason I've almost never tried to replay MM6/7/8. It's pretty much the only reason I would need Win98.
That said, I'm morbidly curious about this game. I have absolutely no expectations, I just want to see what they do with it.
I for one like to judge games on their merits, and not "big evol corporation" backstories people who spend more time on boards than actually playing games like to be so obessed about. And VII was simply just fine and in some ways a much more accomplished and polished game than VI : arcomage, more racial and class options, better fleshed out skill system, a storyline that actually seemed to go somewhere, better outdoor environments, even some limited c&c. The world wasn't all that much smaller either, it's basically just the megadungeons that are mostly absent in VII. Of course they already had the engine up and running at that time and they used the same basic mechanics as in VI so they didn't need the same long development cycle. VII wasn't exactly next-gen compared to VI but a slightly better M&M is still a better M&M.The decline had already started with VII, New World Computing had contractual obligations with 3DO that forced them to drastically shorten their development cycles, and it shows. VI was a much more complete and polished product, with a lot more content and a much bigger world.
What OS did you play it on? Isn't windows 95/98 required? That's one reason I've almost never tried to replay MM6/7/8. It's pretty much the only reason I would need Win98.
Before the forum change, World of Xeen was winning the poll in the Best Might and Magic thread. Clearly the Codex has :declined: even further since 2011.
I really don't want to troll but the Wizardry series outperformed Might&Magic at any time. I can remember how wrong the perspective in M&M games was, so much that I've got a headache from it.
No part of the M&M series ever reached a 'Bane of Cosmic Forge' or 'Crusaders of the Dark Savant'.
I really don't want to troll but the Wizardry series outperformed Might&Magic at any time. I can remember how wrong the perspective in M&M games was, so much that I've got a headache from it.
No part of the M&M series ever reached a 'Bane of Cosmic Forge' or 'Crusaders of the Dark Savant'.
Ubisoft is disgracing Wizardry too?
I really don't want to troll but the Wizardry series outperformed Might&Magic at any time. I can remember how wrong the perspective in M&M games was, so much that I've got a headache from it.
No part of the M&M series ever reached a 'Bane of Cosmic Forge' or 'Crusaders of the Dark Savant'.
Ubisoft is disgracing Wizardry too?
I think in order to be sure of that, we need to first define: what is a RPG.Ugh... it's not like Ubisoft is known for their RPGs... Might and Magic: Clash of Heroes, Settlers 2 and Lost Magic?
http://www.ubi.com/UK/Games/Search.aspx?plTag=ds
Any of these actually good enough to make us confident that MMX will be an incline?
I don't know about the other two, but Settlers 2 is no RPG.
Ubisoft is disgracing Wizardry too?