Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Codex Review RPG Codex Review: Pathfinder Kingmaker

Kruno

Arcane
Patron
Village Idiot Zionist Agent Shitposter
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
11,478
I bought this game expecting an RPG, but I couldn't find anywhere in the game where I could get a dragon shout. This game is nothing like Skyrim. I kept dying during the tutorial and couldn't even progress on the story difficulty. This game is broken, has no dragon shouts and it takes Einstein levels of IQ to play.
 

Iluvcheezcake

Prophet
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
1,826
Location
Le Balkans
DMs will regularly change the stats of enemies to fit the party on the fly anyways, it's not really the same.
Similar issue I have with things like e.g., 3e/PF weapon focus feat in cRPGs. At tabletop, a DM will alter drops to make sure your weapon focus isn't useless. In a cRPG, unless you've played it before, there's a good chance you may never encounter a single weapon worth using in your focus.
DDO(3.5e-ish homebrew) solved this by simply grouping like weapons(e.g., "Weapon Focus: Slashing"), which feels good enough to me.

I'd be impressed with a cRPG that's smart enough to acknowledge feat choices on player characters and slightly fudge the loot though.

A lot of cRPGs feel like they're designed by people who never actually DM'd a tabletop RPG :M

AFAIK NWN1 had a bigger chance for weapon drops that you had weapon focus in
 

Iluvcheezcake

Prophet
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
1,826
Location
Le Balkans

Serious_Business

Best Poster on the Codex
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
3,956
Location
Frown Town
Should have titled the thing "Review : Pathfucker Cuckmaker" or somesuch. I enjoy the Codex infantile habit of transposing vulgar terms in the titles - it is very expressive indeed. I for one am favorable to something like "Turdfinder Cuntmaker", as it is you must admit very researched in nature. One can be creative here, which is essential.
 

Slaver1

Savant
Joined
Dec 9, 2019
Messages
346
A shitty milquetoast review, 2 years late, for perhaps the best CRPG ever made. Well done 'Dex. Can someone please retroactively skewer the abomination called DOS2 as well?

They could try and make the 3d models better. POE ones look gorgeous in both 1 and 2. say what you want about poe its a pretty game.

I think Kingmaker looks better than both PoEs, though there's nothing terribly wrong with the latter. :M
I love the spartan, consistent art design of PK, all for a fraction of POE's budget.
 
Last edited:

iZerw

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
899
Location
Russia
A shitty milquetoast review, 2 years late, for perhaps the best CRPG ever made. Well done 'Dex. Can someone please retroactively skewer the abomination called DOS2 as well?

They could try and make the 3d models better. POE ones look gorgeous in both 1 and 2. say what you want about poe its a pretty game.

I think Kingmaker looks better than both PoEs, though there's nothing terribly wrong with the latter. :M
I love the spartan, consistent art design of PK, all for a fraction of POE's budget.
Meanwhile Codex had to write a dozen reviews just not to admit Obsidian all loved is gone and RPG Renaissance will never happen.
 

Sin2x

Scholar
Joined
Dec 5, 2016
Messages
100
P:K is a soulless mechanistical attempt at creating a big-world AAA CRPG for profit to feed off grognard nostalgia, Chinese-style. I'm not impressed. And you ("all") dare to compare it to ToEE? Blasphemy, even considering that ToEE itself is no masterpiece, merely a good game, 8/10 or so.

It's not a diamond in the rough, it's a hamburger on-the-go. Eat it and forget it.
 

Zboj Lamignat

Arcane
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
5,768
I always consume 100h (+at least 50 caused by build porn restartitits) crpgs on the go and them forget them immediately after. That's what I do. That's my thing.
 

Whisper

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
4,357
"I set Enemy Difficulty to Weak because that's the closest enemy attributes get to the Rules As Written; Normal has them higher than what they should be."


One of reasons is that monster stats are higher because in table-top RPG you cant save.
Also you can use A.I. weaknesses (enemies attack first target as tank etc.) which no DM will allow you to.

Watch interview with devs, this is explained.

Stop being wimp, easy is easy, is has nothing to do with "Rules As Written". Because monster with same stats will be harder once you cant save and once DM play monster perfectly, unlike A.I.

 

Desiderius

Found your egg, Robinett, you sneaky bastard
Patron
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
14,830
Insert Title Here Pathfinder: Wrath
P:K is a soulless mechanistical attempt at creating a big-world AAA CRPG for profit to feed off grognard nostalgia, Chinese-style. I'm not impressed. And you ("all") dare to compare it to ToEE? Blasphemy, even considering that ToEE itself is no masterpiece, merely a good game, 8/10 or so.

It's not a diamond in the rough, it's a hamburger on-the-go. Eat it and forget it.

Now play another two hours.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,668
Stop being wimp, easy is easy, is has nothing to do with "Rules As Written". Because monster with same stats will be harder once you cant save and once DM play monster perfectly, unlike A.I.

A DM isn't supposed to play monsters "perfectly" they're supposed to play them in-character. Being able to reload is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned.
 

smaug

Secular Koranism with Israeli Characteristics
Patron
Dumbfuck
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,057
Location
Texas
Insert Title Here
I can't imagine playing this on easy, from chapter 2 and onwards hard is mandatory. Enemy stats are inflated to help deal with power-curve, so regardless how butthurt inflated stats make you, they are necessary to the difficulty of Pathfinder.
 
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
5,392
Stop being wimp, easy is easy, is has nothing to do with "Rules As Written". Because monster with same stats will be harder once you cant save and once DM play monster perfectly, unlike A.I.

A DM isn't supposed to play monsters "perfectly" they're supposed to play them in-character. Being able to reload is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned.

The kind of autists that like Shitmaker would put Crispy and Crispyㅤ (not sure which one is the true one) as a DM:

Crispy the DM: The Beholder gazes at you for 200 points of damage!
Gregz: <casts Blindness on the Beholder>
Crispy the DM: You think you are funny, Greggypoo? Blind beholder grows a massive penis and strikes you for 3000 points of ass damage!
 

Lawntoilet

Prophet
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2018
Messages
1,840
Stop being wimp, easy is easy, is has nothing to do with "Rules As Written". Because monster with same stats will be harder once you cant save and once DM play monster perfectly, unlike A.I.

A DM isn't supposed to play monsters "perfectly" they're supposed to play them in-character. Being able to reload is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned.

The kind of autists that like Shitmaker would put Crispy and Crispyㅤ (not sure which one is the true one) as a DM:

Crispy the DM: The Beholder gazes at you for 200 points of damage!
Gregz: <casts Blindness on the Beholder>
Crispy the DM: You think you are funny, Greggypoo? Blind beholder grows a massive penis and strikes you for 3000 points of ass damage!
Jesus will you and Greg just get it over with and bang already, you're literally writing assfuck fanfic about him
 
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
5,392
It's the 21st century, you toilet named retard. Being gay is not really an insult anymore. Liking Shitmaker, however, is. ;)
 
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
5,392
It's interesting how everyone who likes Shitmaker is named The Stupid or Toiletmaker, or whatever. Not saying there is a direct correlation, but on the other hand...
 

a cut of domestic sheep prime

Guest
Being gay is not really an insult anymore.
For the prevalent majority of humanity it still is. Also, about 1/8 of humanity will kill you for such insult without hesitation.
lol, I like how you think Africa and every country in the continent of Asia (with, ironically, possibly the exception of China), blacks in America and everything south of the US border makes up 1/8th of the human population. :M
 
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
5,392
Look, toiletman: you need to stop getting so butthurt every time I insult Shitmaker. It's like I said something about yo momma.

Yo Shitmaker so dumb, it has a rotating game menu, so you have to wait until it stops rotating before you can click on anything. Trolololol.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom