Maybe you guys are taking
my post a little too seriously, judging by all the negative reactions.
I don't mean that I dislike Baldur's Gate or that I want it to be more like (god forbid) modern Bethesda. I just mean that starting up BG1 and taking my first step out of Winthrop's feels like a commitment - and like you boys, I'm afraid to commit. I know that if I roll up a character I like, I'll be in it for the long haul, sinking hundreds of hours into this thing, until I finally stand over the bleeding corpse of Irenicus (or before the throne of Bhaal). I just spent weeks watching the Office's nine seasons, and I don't start something like that without some trepidation. And it's not like it's a fresh new journey, I've walked it several times.
So that is why I feel split on the idea of beginning a Baldur's Gate game. I don't really even consider this 'complaining'. It's just an observation.
Bethesda games, for all the criticism they get, are easy to pick up and put down. Plenty of times, I've rolled up a character, sent her on her own little journey, and then stopped playing. That's one of the few advantages an Oblivion offers over a Baldur's Gate.
Thanks for reading this far. I hope that makes things clearer. God bless you, and the troops, and the mothers of the troops.
Still upset? Too bad bros, I was playing Baldur's Gate and Daggerfall when you were just an itch in Bhaal's bag of holding.