This is getting tiresome not for you let me clarify but the whole argument.
Nigger, you could spend much less time just citing things properly and save us both some time. I don't want to read a long ass paragraph from you on your theories.
Which she says she did before ever undergoing her rite of passage into adulthood.
Viconia had the time to become an acolyte and a priestess had the time to see her dinasty fall
Really, how hard is it to spellcheck, Meb? "Dinasty"? "Elvea"? Come on.
Also take in consideration that the power a cleric have from their God is something personal between the devoted and the divinity itself. Is no more like that in fifth edition so eventually before becoming a cleric she had to convince Shar to give her powers and that dosnt happen in a blink of an eye expecially for Shar that is often villified and secrecy is part of her whole being.
Eh. Aren't there circumstances even in 2E where this happens fairly quickly? For example, traveling to a different plane where the cleric's god isn't worshiped?
Even so, I think we're well within the 70-year timeframe between the fall of her house and BG1.
I looked it up and the base age for a Drow is 80, not 100. She said she served an age and a half. We can't know what this means, but we can assume it was her entire childhood and adolescence, plus a few years after - long enough to piss everyone off on her first baby sacrifice.
So, let's assume she was taken for service at 40, became an adult at 80 and fled at 100, since she didn't actually flee after hesitating on sacrificing the infant.
Then, it was 70 years until BG1, making her 170 at the time.
BG3 takes place 124 years later, making her 294.
So, add a 100 years or take away 20, it won't really matter. She still wasn't old by D&D 5E standards, which max elves out around 750. Middle-aged at best. I think 3E did similar, but I forget.
However, 2E said that Drow enter old age at 190 and venerable at 225+. And yet the game was written as 2.5E. A tricky situation, but since we are in 5E, we should probably use the 5E timescale.
And if we used the 2E timescale (edit: as
Eisenheinrich suggests, I see), the book I am referencing ("The Complete Book of Elves") still rebukes your argument:
Elves do not feel the effects of age as humans know them. After an elf has grown to maturity, her features cease to change or, at least, change very slowly. There is very little difference between the way a 100-year-old elf and a 400-year-old elf appear. The only way to tell between young and old is the degree of exuberance, spontaneity, and enthusiasm each exhibit. Only at venerable age do elves begin to show their years, yet they still appear younger than most humans do at age 50.
I know some people can age poorly by 50, but Viconia looks like she's in her mid to late 60s or 70s in BG3, and she wouldn't have been that far into venerability, for an elf.
Ultimately though, this is all an exercise in autism. As I said before, they could have written off a good-looking Viconia or Jaheira with magical alteration and the game admits this.
It's just a different game made by people with a MUCH different philosophy, market and goal - and maybe a fairly large axe to grind.