- Joined
- Mar 22, 2013
- Messages
- 12,807
How often did you fuck the bear?But did you escape the nautiloid yet?
How often did you fuck the bear?But did you escape the nautiloid yet?
WotC's writing has suffered due to excessive politicization. For example, take a look at 5th Edition Dragonlance. What do you see in the trailer? Anything that makes you remember weiss and hickman novels ? No , you see clever women from diverse backgrounds struggling against what ? dragons and draconians? No, you see an army of white men in armor, then only a red dragon in the background. This sets the tone, and it's already evident that the same bias will be present in the PDF, you can check it on the web easily. Any minority character will be portrayed like a glorified and dignified knight with black skin, while the next white character is a corrupted, overweight, and balding Solamnic knight. I am not making it up, just read the book. With such bias and priorities, how can we expect anything of quality? Then they emphasize hiring authors from diverse backgrounds, but I don't care about the authors' skin colors, give me back Weiss and Hickmann or someone of the same caliber.To be fair WotC's writing hasn't been much better for the majority of this ed. Got the pair shittin in the same pot.Larian: fuck the lore, write whatever shit they want, even if it conflicts with the setting of DnD or the previous two games' story.
players: WoW it's must be the WOTC force them to write these. It's definately not Larian's fault the game has shit writing.
Then they emphasize hiring authors from diverse backgrounds, but I don't care about the authors' skin colors, give me back Weiss and Hickmann or someone of the same caliber.
Congrats for winning the dumbass takes of the day awardThe right cares about quality. The left, about equality/equity.
You really like this meme word of the month from 2013 huhBaizuo
Yes, that's my point. The establishment of the Poz as the default required denigrating the broadly puritan norms which preceded them. They're trying to re-implement the denigration to counter the Poz instead of the ding an sich.When he mention woke puritan, he mentions the morality : Everything which the average cis male likes is heresy and everything "against standards" "muh progress". And everything liked by cis males are things for incels, for them even Dan Bilzerian is an incel.
How you're seen by those who have power over you can never be a trivial matter. The weak suffer what they must.You really like this meme word of the month from 2013 huh
I'll play it again when they restore the cut content. If that's a DLC so be it. Likely will have to raise level cap which will be fine.Still enjoyed the game, but probably won't replay until they released goty edition or some shit
Typical Larian game I say. You enjoy it while playing but won't give you any reasons to replay unless enhanced version or co-op with buddies. This is kinda their best one yet because older titles had really shallow end game sections. They get better with Div OS 2 but it was still bad when you reach the last city.
At least post some proper fanart and not ai slopdiarrhea
Yes, that's my point. The establishment of the Poz as the default required denigrating the broadly puritan norms which preceded them. They're trying to re-implement the denigration to counter the Poz instead of the ding an sich.When he mention woke puritan, he mentions the morality : Everything which the average cis male likes is heresy and everything "against standards" "muh progress". And everything liked by cis males are things for incels, for them even Dan Bilzerian is an incel.
How you're seen by those who have power over you can never be a trivial matter. The weak suffer what they must.You really like this meme word of the month from 2013 huh
I'll play it again when they restore the cut content. If that's a DLC so be it. Likely will have to raise level cap which will be fine.Still enjoyed the game, but probably won't replay until they released goty edition or some shit
Typical Larian game I say. You enjoy it while playing but won't give you any reasons to replay unless enhanced version or co-op with buddies. This is kinda their best one yet because older titles had really shallow end game sections. They get better with Div OS 2 but it was still bad when you reach the last city.
Yes, that's my point. The establishment of the Poz as the default required denigrating the broadly puritan norms which preceded them. They're trying to re-implement the denigration to counter the Poz instead of the ding an sich.When he mention woke puritan, he mentions the morality : Everything which the average cis male likes is heresy and everything "against standards" "muh progress". And everything liked by cis males are things for incels, for them even Dan Bilzerian is an incel.
How you're seen by those who have power over you can never be a trivial matter. The weak suffer what they must.You really like this meme word of the month from 2013 huh
I'll play it again when they restore the cut content. If that's a DLC so be it. Likely will have to raise level cap which will be fine.Still enjoyed the game, but probably won't replay until they released goty edition or some shit
Typical Larian game I say. You enjoy it while playing but won't give you any reasons to replay unless enhanced version or co-op with buddies. This is kinda their best one yet because older titles had really shallow end game sections. They get better with Div OS 2 but it was still bad when you reach the last city.
Puritan or family friendly? D&D was a game primarily played by kids and adolescents so it makes sense for it to be family friendly. Lord of the Rings is not Puritan because it doesn't have a bunch of explicit sex.
Now there is room for D&D and fantasy to have both family friendly settings and adult themed settings. You don't have to go full on coomer/degenerate because the setting was previously family friendly. What sense does that make? Have normal sexual content, not weird tentacle porn and beastality.
That's a black "human" "female".the orc woman is downright hideous.
You could take game boxes as examples as well, they were significantly better than now, just a few samples from SSI games:Yes, that's my point. The establishment of the Poz as the default required denigrating the broadly puritan norms which preceded them. They're trying to re-implement the denigration to counter the Poz instead of the ding an sich.When he mention woke puritan, he mentions the morality : Everything which the average cis male likes is heresy and everything "against standards" "muh progress". And everything liked by cis males are things for incels, for them even Dan Bilzerian is an incel.
How you're seen by those who have power over you can never be a trivial matter. The weak suffer what they must.You really like this meme word of the month from 2013 huh
I'll play it again when they restore the cut content. If that's a DLC so be it. Likely will have to raise level cap which will be fine.Still enjoyed the game, but probably won't replay until they released goty edition or some shit
Typical Larian game I say. You enjoy it while playing but won't give you any reasons to replay unless enhanced version or co-op with buddies. This is kinda their best one yet because older titles had really shallow end game sections. They get better with Div OS 2 but it was still bad when you reach the last city.
Puritan or family friendly? D&D was a game primarily played by kids and adolescents so it makes sense for it to be family friendly. Lord of the Rings is not Puritan because it doesn't have a bunch of explicit sex.
Now there is room for D&D and fantasy to have both family friendly settings and adult themed settings. You don't have to go full on coomer/degenerate because the setting was previously family friendly. What sense does that make? Have normal sexual content, not weird tentacle porn and beastality.
There is a difference between nuDnD puritan garbage, and family friendly DnD of the 80's and some settings in the 90's
Here is puritan 5th edition. Everyone is covered head to toe and in general nobody is really attractive. Elf is passable the orc woman is downright hideous. After all we need to avoid male gaze which is the greatest sin of all.
View attachment 42325
Now here is cover of Queen of Darkness module. While the cover is still family friendly the artists wasn't afraid to draw attractive people showing some skin since it was appropriate.
View attachment 42326
Another comparison.
Here is 5th edition player's manual barbarian
View attachment 42327
And here is the same class from ADnD The Complete Barbarian's Handbook (class wasn't included in the core rulebook)
View attachment 42328
I agree that super horny attitude of BG3 is not appropriate for Dungeons and Dragons game, some parts aren't appropriate for any game at all, but 5th edition definitely has this leftist puritan vibe to it.
Why is it marketed to women when most of the player base is men?BG3's cover art looks fine. Those SSI arts were very clearly marketed to young men, and BG3, very much is marketed to young women, so of course the pretty-boy twink is gonna be front and center there.
I find BG 3's art pretty decent. 5e's art is very hit-or-miss however, usually miss. I think it's because even when trying to look natural everyone looks like they're made of plastic and just stepped out of Sephora.
That Queen of Darkness cover is disgustingly, offensively '80s but at least there's nothing there that wouldn't be present in some capacity in a Medieval setting (Fantasy Squid man and Ogres not withstanding.)
You wanna know what's a really good way to tell how people would've dressed in ye-olde times? Performing at a Renn Faire.
I've done it for 2 years now and let me tell you, dressing in multiple layers of leather jerkin, cape, bracers, gloves and gambeson **fucking sucks**, especially in the California heat. It sucks so much that I fully understand why medieval manuscripts never show even knights dressing that way unless they're actively going to battle.
Bracers, especially, look swanky but feel awful to wear. Thick leather straps restricting the wrists is not a good time.
Let's draw a comparison, which one reminds you of DnD the most?I find BG 3's art pretty decent.
Sounds like a scenario from an anime.But since back cover synopsis is what you're going for, sure, here's BG3's synopsis from Steam:
Gather your party and return to the Forgotten Realms in a tale of fellowship and betrayal, sacrifice and survival, and the lure of absolute power.
Mysterious abilities are awakening inside you, drawn from a mind flayer parasite planted in your brain. Resist, and turn darkness against itself. Or embrace corruption, and become ultimate evil.
From the creators of Divinity: Original Sin 2 comes a next-generation RPG, set in the world of Dungeons & Dragons.
sounds like fantasy shlock to me.
OkaySounds like a scenario from an anime tentacle.But since back cover synopsis is what you're going for, sure, here's BG3's synopsis from Steam:
Gather your party and return to the Forgotten Realms in a tale of fellowship and betrayal, sacrifice and survival, and the lure of absolute power.
Mysterious abilities are awakening inside you, drawn from a mind flayer parasite planted in your brain. Resist, and turn darkness against itself. Or embrace corruption, and become ultimate evil.
From the creators of Divinity: Original Sin 2 comes a next-generation RPG, set in the world of Dungeons & Dragons.
sounds like fantasy shlock to me.
They will never be real womenFemale players, especially in DnD/tabletop, are growing
That artwork was originally the cover of the 4th Greyhawk novel (2nd in a series of 4 by Rose Estes) called The Price of Power, from 1987:And here is the same class from ADnD The Complete Barbarian's Handbook (class wasn't included in the core rulebook)
View attachment 42328
I luv Lae'zel bros
![]()
I do not disagree. How can you talk about building intriguing narratives and fleshed-out worlds, when you're busy trying to erase the concept of race entirely in your game? Literal clown world shit.WotC's writing has suffered due to excessive politicization.