whydoibother
Arcane
But do you get a tadpole this way?Just found Gandrel the monster hunter.
Handed the vampire scum over. Watching him get confused, before being king hit and dragged off was more satisfying than killing him
But do you get a tadpole this way?Just found Gandrel the monster hunter.
Handed the vampire scum over. Watching him get confused, before being king hit and dragged off was more satisfying than killing him
Yes unless there's another way to bypass the forcefield , but i havent found yet.Anyone know
how to take Lae'zel to the inquisitor? Can't find him anywhere in the Creche
Only way is to first give the artifact to the captain, i know it's counterintuitive and sounds a very bad idea yet its mandatory to the story , then only you can access the part behind the foirce field. There's also a very good artefact to find past them if you did lathander's blood quest, also the only way to get it
Weird design.
durge update Barbarian
where did you get your info from? I'm now into Act 2 and have had no Wisdom saves, no rampaging, killing of romance/companions etc. It seems your info was faulty.
yup, you can purge pretty much everything that annoys youSerious question my fellow based gamers. I'm sure the game is great, I loved both D:OS games, but I really can't stand woke writing and blatant faggotry. I could not play Pathfinder:WotR for more than 1 hour for example. Would you recommend to get this now?
BG3 is nearing a 750 000 concurrent players peak. It's all-time #9 right now.
Still, it doesn't look likely to reach the 880 000 of Hogwarts Legacy, but this can be forgiven at this point.
If you play with a controller, the UI elements get bigger, including fonts and the like. Just like in D:OS 1+2Yeah, the UI is definitely not the most user-friendly. Solasta's is much cleaner in comparison IMHO.This UI man.
There's a teeny tiny button that switches between trading (selling straight for gold) and bartering.
If you play with a controller
I expect that, buried within the site's EULA, your new designation of Mod Author gives Nexus the right to repackage your mod into any collection they so choose, and prevent you from truly deleting it from their servers and/or restrict how they package and use it.Lol, I went to check my mod's page and was greeted by this message on the nexus:
View attachment 39698
No need for such praise, I just turned three textures transparent
Thanks, agris
So far I find the game less 'in your face' about that than WoTR, outside of the character generator. If you don't want to accidentally put a dick on your female char, either leave the genitals on 'default' or when the game launches the first time and -literally- asks you to show or hide genitals , click 'no'.Serious question my fellow based gamers. I'm sure the game is great, I loved both D:OS games, but I really can't stand woke writing and blatant faggotry. I could not play Pathfinder:WotR for more than 1 hour for example. Would you recommend to get this now?
It's less gay than WotR for my 18 hours of playing it.Serious question my fellow based gamers. I'm sure the game is great, I loved both D:OS games, but I really can't stand woke writing and blatant faggotry. I could not play Pathfinder:WotR for more than 1 hour for example. Would you recommend to get this now?
They do prove the point there's a market for nudity, porn and zoophilia, that's all.they do prove the point that there is a market for these kinds of games
It's a turn based rpg. A console genre, or at least, very comfortable to play with a controller. Plus, it does makes the UI much more comfortable.If you play with a controller
Feels bad that there are no real bros in the game, well, since everything seems to have sexual undertones. Down with romance and up with bromance, I say! I just want an adventure partner of the same sex that don't want to cross swords naked, if you know what I mean. Someone to watch your back, without you having to watch the guy watching your back so you don't get raped.
Something I am trying to find outcan you fuck both minthara and shadowheart?
This game is better mechanically than BG1 and BG2. Not even kidding. The UI and writing is whatever. Exploring feels super rewarding as well.I expect that, buried within the site's EULA, your new designation of Mod Author gives Nexus the right to repackage your mod into any collection they so choose, and prevent you from truly deleting it from their servers and/or restrict how they package and use it.Lol, I went to check my mod's page and was greeted by this message on the nexus:
View attachment 39698
No need for such praise, I just turned three textures transparent
Thanks, agris
Not that it matters for this, and it's cool you went ahead and made it. Glad something positive came from our discussion!
I still think my chance of playing this is very small. I loath Larian's design sensibilities, and love / cut my teeth on BG1/BG2 when they were released. When I look at screens of BG3, not only do I not see a successor to BG3, I see a toy meant for children. Yes, BG1 and BG2 had childish moments. I don't wishcast them into some grimdark nostalgia fever-dream (plus I replay them enough to know this isn't true), yet the combination of Larian's eye-bleedingly ugly UI and horrendous writing, plus the trash fire that all AD&D versions after 2e are has left me feeling more than ambivalent about BG3.
I'd say piggybacking off of the hard work and legacy of the people who made famous, well-regarded classics makes your product much more popular than actually making your own thing. Which is why barely anyone creates anything new and interesting anymore. Reboots, remasters and reimaginings is all we deserve.They do prove the point there's a market for nudity, porn and zoophilia, that's all.they do prove the point that there is a market for these kinds of games
Same here, but I've reached a reconciliation with BG3 by adopting the viewpoint that BG and BG2 in their attempt to emulate PnP gave birth to a subgenre of cRPGs which started a life of its own. While they will always be the best at their own thing, Larian's BG3 is running in a different lane. It's not trying to outdo them as a BG-like game, it's outdoing them in the broader task of being a better PnP adaptation to the videogame medium. And I think it's objectively better at that.love / cut my teeth on BG1/BG2 when they were released
Care to explain? Points I'd be interested in:This game is better mechanically than BG1 and BG2. Not even kidding. The UI and writing is whatever. Exploring feels super rewarding as well.I expect that, buried within the site's EULA, your new designation of Mod Author gives Nexus the right to repackage your mod into any collection they so choose, and prevent you from truly deleting it from their servers and/or restrict how they package and use it.Lol, I went to check my mod's page and was greeted by this message on the nexus:
View attachment 39698
No need for such praise, I just turned three textures transparent
Thanks, agris
Not that it matters for this, and it's cool you went ahead and made it. Glad something positive came from our discussion!
I still think my chance of playing this is very small. I loath Larian's design sensibilities, and love / cut my teeth on BG1/BG2 when they were released. When I look at screens of BG3, not only do I not see a successor to BG3, I see a toy meant for children. Yes, BG1 and BG2 had childish moments. I don't wishcast them into some grimdark nostalgia fever-dream (plus I replay them enough to know this isn't true), yet the combination of Larian's eye-bleedingly ugly UI and horrendous writing, plus the trash fire that all AD&D versions after 2e are has left me feeling more than ambivalent about BG3.