Larianshill
Arbiter
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2021
- Messages
- 2,358
I have no idea what's up with this guy's portrait, but he looks metal as shit
![IaxMGqK.png](https://i.imgur.com/IaxMGqK.png)
Kind of reminds me of Sam Worthington:I have no idea what's up with this guy's portrait, but he looks metal as shit
![]()
Since I like to shill for the blog of this historian lad, to quote from a recent article of his:Ended so well for Rome.friendly coexistence with barbarians
This was not necessarily a bad thing: the Romans, after conflict and plague in the late second and third centuries, needed troops and they needed farmers and these ‘barbarians’ could supply both. But as we’ve discussed elsewhere, the Romans make a catastrophic mistake here: instead of reviving the Roman tradition of incorporation, they insisted on effectively permanent apartness for the new arrivals, even when they came – as most would – with initial Roman approval.
This problem blows up in 378 in an event – the Battle of Adrianople – which marks the beginning of the ‘decline and fall’ and thus the start of our ‘long fifth century.’ The Goths, a Germanic-language speaking people, pressured by the Huns had sought entry into Roman territory; the emperor in the East, Valens, agreed because he needed soldiers and farmers and the Goths might well be both. Local officials, however, mistreated the arriving Goth refugees leading to clashes and then a revolt; precisely because the Goths hadn’t been incorporated into the Roman military or civil system (they were settled with their own kings as ‘allies’ – foederati – within Roman territory), when they revolted, they revolted as a united people under arms. The army sent to fight them, under Valens, engaged foolishly before reinforcements could arrive from the West and was defeated.
In the aftermath of the defeat, the Goths moved to settle in the Balkans and it would subsequently prove impossible for the Romans to move them out. Part of the reason for that was that the Romans themselves were hardly unified. I don’t want to get too deep in the weeds here except to note that usurpers and assassinations among the Roman elite are common in this period, which generally prevented any kind of unified Roman response. In particular, it leads Roman leaders (both generals and emperors) desperate for troops, often to fight civil wars against each other, to rely heavily on Gothic (and later other ‘barbarian’) war leaders. Those leaders, often the kings of their own peoples, were not generally looking to burn the empire down, but were looking to create a place for themselves in it and so understandably tended to militate for their own independence and recognition.
I have no idea what's up with this guy's portrait, but he looks metal as shit
![]()
I've been playing the game for about 15 hours
Overall it's a pretty mediocre experience
I'm just playing on normal difficulty which in hindsight might've been a mistake, but the combat encounters have been almost insultingly easy so far.
Probably a reference to the HBO ROME character of the same name (which is itself a reference to the "historical" personage mentioned in Caesar's writings). Infinitron this probably answers your question whether they're in the game.
Now now, it's been 3 days and it's a weekend as well.I've been playing the game for about 15 hours
Overall it's a pretty mediocre experience
Damn, 15 hours in two days. Sounds pretty mediocre.
I'm just playing on normal difficulty which in hindsight might've been a mistake, but the combat encounters have been almost insultingly easy so far.
Playing on normal difficulty in modern day and insulted by the lack of challenge...
You have some valid points, but you seem to be fishing for some kodex kool kreds in that post more than anything. If the game was really as lackluster as you say, you probably wouldn't be as compelled to play so much of it in such short amount of time.
Now now, it's been 3 days and it's a weekend as well.
I'd been looking forward to this game for a long time so I won't let myself get deterred by elements I dislike just because they appear early on. Despite its faults I still acknowledge the game as entertaining so far but that doesn't change the fact it's not what I'd hoped for.
This is Larianshill reporting from act 2. I would like to post a daily reminder that pacification missions SUCK.
I enjoyed the first one. What was wrong with it ?
Anyone knows how to craft more throwing spears?
Yeah, I actually enjoy the pacification missions. Spices things up, adds some nice variety and challenge.
(you attack a camp surrounded by hills full of archers that have LoS on you all the time and are very hard to reach)
That hairstyle gives me more of a Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction vibe tbh.
Looks nothing like Omar Sharif...![]()
He looks like Omar Sharif. He fits into the region.