Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Jagged Alliance 3 from Haemimont Games

ERYFKRAD

Barbarian
Patron
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
30,119
Strap Yourselves In Serpent in the Staglands Shadorwun: Hong Kong Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
It also tells me that your apartment is a shithole and you probably smell like ass, because you don't spend enough time in real life putting laundry into the closet, forks and spoons into the silverware drawer, or hygiene products into the medicine cabinet. There's no other explanation for "putting things away" to be a thrilling fantasy for you.
My sincere apologies. I did not realize you have difficulty moving your ass to put things in their place in your domicile.
 

mondblut

Arcane
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
22,870
Location
Ingrija
Not gonna lie, dragging tiny icons of bullets back and forth from one tiny box into another tiny box (and then into another tiny box!) is not something I will miss. At all. It's OK for mercs to automate sharing ammo, just like it's OK that I don't have to take off their shoes every night before they go to bed and put the shoes back on and tie the shoelaces for them every morning.

Were it not for the issue of ammo capacity, we would still be fighting with WW1 era guns. Hey, they do great damage and have excellent range and accuracy, what else do you need from a weapon?

Ah, yes. Being able to carry more than 20 rounds without getting exhausted. How trite.
 

thesheeep

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
10,118
Location
Tampere, Finland
Codex 2012 Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Ah, yes. Being able to carry more than 20 rounds without getting exhausted. How trite.
You don't need menial bullshit tasks like dragging ammo items through inventories to simulate that.
A global or rather mission-wide pool can be a completely sufficient abstraction.

As long as that pool is not just an endless pool but actually tied to the mercs.
I would prefer if you could set yourself what percentage of your mercs' inventory you want to offer up for carrying ammo on a mission. But if it is a fixed size pool, that's still "okay".
You don't need a physical representation of every single bullet on each merc to believe that mercs are capable of managing their own ammo. Just like you don't need a physical representation of their lungs to believe they can breathe. It's a menial task, which is why it is fine to abstract it away to a degree and focus on important things instead.

If it is some unlimited size pool, then yes that would be pointless. Might as well not have any ammo then like in XCOM.

That's the thing, though, how IS that pool calculated? Does it have limits? Does anyone know? :lol:
 

mondblut

Arcane
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
22,870
Location
Ingrija
A global or rather mission-wide pool can be a completely sufficient abstraction.

What "mission"? Providing it's Jagged Alliance and not another shit xcom clone, you don't have "missions", you move around the world and occasionally stumble into hostile sectors. If it got "missions", count me out right away, leave this shit to zombras.

You don't need a physical representation of every single bullet on each merc to believe that mercs are capable of managing their own ammo.

Akshually, you do. Having 5 mags filled with bullets and having 1 mag and 100 bullets to refill it 5 times makes a world of difference when every action point counts.

It's a menial task, which is why it is fine to abstract it away to a degree and focus on important things instead.

Like, uh... sending your grenade launcher guy half a map away and have the rest use their superhero powers to teleport spare rockets to him when he needs some more? Yeah, button awesome happens.
 

thesheeep

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
10,118
Location
Tampere, Finland
Codex 2012 Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
What "mission"? Providing it's Jagged Alliance and not another shit xcom clone, you don't have "missions", you move around the world and occasionally stumble into hostile sectors. If it got "missions", count me out right away, leave this shit to zombras.
That makes no difference whatsoever. As soon as you leave base (however they represent that, but there is always some kind of notion of a base), the amount of ammo you can have is limited until you return.
If you call that "mission" or not is nothing but semantics.

I really don't care if there is a strong mission / base separation or if your every movement is simulated on the geography.
The combat and general management is the meat of the game, the rest is window dressing.

Akshually, you do. Having 5 mags filled with bullets and having 1 mag and 100 bullets to refill it 5 times makes a world of difference when every action point counts.
Yes, and I would trust a professional merc to do the former and not the latter. So it can be abstracted away and assumed to be done by the merc. No need to have the player drag ammo icons around for large chunks of the playtime...
You don't have to play a surgeon minigame for the doctor to patch up a merc, either, or an aiming minigame for taking shots.
But for some reason you want an ammo icon dragging minigame, because sure, that's something the merc can't be trusted with...

Like, uh... sending your grenade launcher guy half a map away and have the rest use their superhero powers to teleport spare rockets to him when he needs some more? Yeah, button awesome happens.
Use your brain for once, will you?
Just because it is a pool, you don't have to assume everything is equally distributed. It makes sense to assume that the rocket guy is the one who carries the rockets. And not everyone carries 1 rocket, 1 magazine for X, 1 magazine for Y, 8 shells, ...
 
Last edited:

mondblut

Arcane
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
22,870
Location
Ingrija
That makes no difference whatsoever. As soon as you leave base (however they represent that, but there is always some kind of notion of a base), the amount of ammo you can have is limited until you return.

JA2 had no "base". That's the point. You moved around mostly living off the land and occasionally sending someone to pick up a shipment from the airport or to offload some loot at Tony's.

That's why it was RPG :smug:

Yes, and I would trust a professional merc to do the former and not the latter. So it can be abstracted away and assumed to be done by the merc.

Mags don't appear out of thin air. Getting an additional spare clip or a larger drum magazine is a Big Deal in this kinda games, you know. But let's handwave an important part of itemization because casuals find micromanagement teh hard.

But for some reason you want an ammo icon dragging minigame, because sure, that's something the merc can't be trusted with...

I don't need a minigame. I want advanced itemization and logistical realities that made intermediate cartridge the thing. If that requires a "minigame", I can live with that. If that's too much for the casual crowd, I'll go back to better games.

You don't have to play a surgeon minigame for the doctor to patch up a merc, either, or an aiming minigame for taking shots.

Akshually, I wouldn't mind it at all if doing brain surgery on a dying man required more effort than spending two generic consumables that are scattered all over the place. I'm not talking about QTE, of course. But requiring a proper operation room facility with a full set of equipment and having to evacuate your guy there as soon as possible wouldn't be out of place at all.

Use your brain for once, will you?
Just because it is a pool, you don't have to assume everything is equally distributed. It makes sense to assume that the rocket guy is the one who carries the rockets.

Except that in reality it's the opposite, LMAO. That's the reason most heavy weapons are teams of two or more, with one carrying the weapon and another, the ammunition for it.
 
Last edited:

Krivol

Magister
Joined
Apr 21, 2012
Messages
2,196
Location
Potatoland aka Prussia
But ammo management was essential in JA2 1.13 where you could choose to use some of the popular ammo (5.56, 7.62 etc) and have the possibility of refuelling it on the battle map, or have more kicking and overall better gun but with exotic ammo (like 6.8) and need to replenish via transports from the airport. And you had shortcuts to put all ammo pieces from the map into one box to avoid tedious micro (also shortcuts for reloading all guns in hands, dropping heavy backpacks etc). I've never found ammo/weapon/weapon mods management boring or too dull - after a big battle it was like opening a Christmas present - will I get a reflex sight? Or ACOG? Match ammo that would turn my short-range SMG into proper AR?
You can make clicking 2 buttons boring and you can make micromanagement of 8-people's ammo and guns exciting. It's a matter of design and JA 2 1.13 has a great design (in that manner at least).
 

ropetight

Savant
Joined
Dec 9, 2018
Messages
1,902
Location
Lower Wolffuckery
Akshually, you do. Having 5 mags filled with bullets and having 1 mag and 100 bullets to refill it 5 times makes a world of difference when every action point counts.
Yes, and I would trust a professional merc to do the former and not the latter. So it can be abstracted away and assumed to be done by the merc. No need to have the player drag ammo icons around for large chunks of the playtime...
No, they wouldn't.

Fewer reloads are not the only consideration for the soldier when it comes to magazine size, be it professional mercenary or regular grunt.
Reliability, since bigger magazines tend to be more unreliable (since they are not powered by magic, but by springs) is one of the reasons why drum magaziines and magazines over 30 bullets are not wider used.
Weapon with bigger magazine becames heavier to wield and to aim over longer time, as it tires your arms - if you are not laying down.
If you lay down, which gives you better protection, better recoil control and better aim, bigger magazine can be obstacle for using weapon.
Ease of storage on mercs, where you have to run with bunch of big drum magazines strapped onto you is also considered, while smaller magazine can be put in the pocket.
Even simple mods like duct taping multiple magazines is usually done when you are defending, and not marching to attack.

In the end, tinkering with amunition is more connected to how far do you want to abstract personal experience of a soldier and make it more small squads strategy game similar to Close Combat.
Jagged Alliance was always about personal and precise control of the mercenaries in which squad often gets separated on the map.
So, not simulating personally divided ammo, where one of the squad members is left without ammuntion and you have to improvise on the field, is not a chore or a menial task.
It is missed chance for great emergent gameplay mechanic, that was present in previous games in the series.

EDIT: Yes, they would. :D
 
Last edited:

thesheeep

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
10,118
Location
Tampere, Finland
Codex 2012 Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
JA2 had no "base". That's the point. You moved around mostly living off the land and occasionally sending someone to pick up a shipment from the airport or to offload some loot at Tony's.
I would still consider that a "base" in gameplay terms, albeit a mobile one.
Still doesn't make a much of a difference though when it comes to pool or no pool.

Mags don't appear out of thin air. Getting an additional spare clip or a larger drum magazine is a Big Deal in this kinda games, you know. But let's handwave an important part of itemization because casuals find micromanagement teh hard.
You are completely misunderstanding why it is getting axed. Nothing about micromanaging ammo is difficult or casual/non-casual.
It's menial. It is so easy to do that it is impossible to fail unless you are entirely braindead. It wastes everyone's time.
That's what makes it a prime candidate to abstract away, not because anyone would be challenged by it :lol:

The only difficulty is ensuring there is enough ammo and not to waste it. So let me worry about making sure that there is enough ammo, the details of who gets what in which pocket is not something I want to be bothered with.

I don't need a minigame. I want advanced itemization and logistical realities that made intermediate cartridge the thing. If that requires a "minigame", I can live with that. If that's too much for the casual crowd, I'll go back to better games.
Important to you and a handful of other autists. Go and play 1.13 then, that's what it's there for.
Everyone else has moved on to realize inventory fiddling X-COM style is the least enjoyable thing about those games and an entirely challenge-free thing to do that takes an unreasonable amount of time.

Akshually, I wouldn't mind it at all if doing brain surgery on a dying man required more effort than spending two generic consumables that are scattered all over the place. I'm not talking about QTE, of course. But requiring a proper operation room facility with a full set of equipment and having to evacuate your guy there as soon as possible wouldn't be out of place at all.
No thanks. I don't need or want "Everything: The Simulation".

Except that in reality it's the opposite, LMAO. That's the reason most heavy weapons are teams of two or more, with one carrying the weapon and another, the ammunition for it.
I'll take the L on that one :lol:
Nevermind, though, I'd rather an abstraction cause a few logical "issues" than being bothered with micromanagement hell.

Honest question, though: Are really big ammo units like rockets or grenades actually part of the ammo pool?

No, they wouldn't.

Fewer reloads are not the only consideration for the soldier when it comes to magazine size, be it professional mercenary or regular grunt.
Reliability, since bigger magazines tend to be more unreliable (since they are not powered by magic, but by springs) is one of the reasons why drum magaziines and magazines over 30 bullets are not wider used.
Weapon with bigger magazine becames heavier to wield and to aim over longer time, as it tires your arms - if you are not laying down.
If you lay down, which gives you better protection, better recoil control and better aim, bigger magazine can be obstacle for using weapon.
Ease of storage on mercs, where you have to run with bunch of big drum magazines strapped onto you is also considered, while smaller magazine can be put in the pocket.
Even simple mods like duct taping multiple magazines is usually done when you are defending, and not marching to attack.
You are actually agreeing with me here (except for the first sentence).
Not sure if I'm getting you wrong or you got me the wrong way around.

In the end, tinkering with amunition is more connected how far do you want to abstract personal experience of a soldier and make it more small squads strategy game similar to Close Combat.
Jagged Alliance was always about personal and precise control of the mercenaries in which squad often gets separated on map.
I would strongly disagree that that's what JA was always about.
It definitely wasn't for me.
And it seems it wasn't for the JA3 devs, either.
For me it was all about the heavily stat-driven squad-based combat (with varying squad sizes and very varied "missions") - and the humor that somehow found its way into the mercs.
The rest I could bare... until I got older and time got more precious. So I'm more than happy JA3 will (hopefully) provide the parts I liked while streamlining the ones I didn't.
 
Last edited:

zapotec

Liturgist
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Messages
1,501
Come on there wasn't any micro-management in vanilla JA2:
All the item in ground were easibly takeable by clicking on the item labe while pressing the highlight button.
All the them in a sector were accessible in the strategic map, items were automatically ordered by type.
 

Strange Fellow

Peculiar
Patron
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
4,258
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Nothing about micromanaging ammo is difficult or casual/non-casual.
It's menial. It is so easy to do that it is impossible to fail unless you are entirely braindead. It wastes everyone's time.
This is just not true. Scarcity and scavenging is a big part of Jagged Alliance, at least in the early game. I refer you to my earlier post:
I've often found myself in situations in previous games where a character has run out of ammo. What now? Does he run over to a squadmate and borrow some ammo from him? But now that guy is low on ammo! Does he risk running over to a downed soldier and scavenging his corpse? But oh no, that's the wrong ammo! Better take his crappy gun too, then. Now my guy is a worse shot. He might have to get closer to the enemy before pulling the trigger, or he might be forced to use one of the precious grenades brought along for emergencies.
Can you not relate to this? Then I question whether you've even played the games.
 

Ghulgothas

Arcane
Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,610
Location
So Below
Dev Diary 12 - Combat, Part 2
Hello and welcome to our second DevDiary dedicated to combat. In case you have missed it, here is Combat Part 1. I am Boian Spasov, Lead Designer, and I will tell you about some of the remaining combat mechanics. As usual, we will follow-up with a DevStream this Thursday where we will discuss all these combat elements, and more!

Combat Start

Although combat in Jagged Alliance 3 is turn-based, the game flows in real time outside of combat. Internally we call this “exploration mode”, since it is most often used when exploring maps either before or after combat encounters. While you are in exploration mode, combat might start for several reasons – the enemies might notice you or one of your allies; they might hear a suspicious sound like a gunshot, explosion or a cry of pain; they might also see something alarming, like a fire starting nearby. All of these lead to a transition to the turn-based “combat mode”.

DevDiary12_01.thumb.jpg.6d8cc4b563d099b0258c3dc76f84e0e0.jpg

Playing first grants a significant advantage in turn-based tactical games and it can often be critical for the battle that follows. Some games decide this balance issue by intermixing the turns of individual units from both teams but this limits the tactics you can use and more importantly, doesn’t feel true to the legacy of Jagged Alliance.

In Jagged Alliance 3 in made sense to grant the first turn to the player team – mercs usually have the initiative in engagements anyway and it never feels good to lose a merc character before you have chance to act at least once in the battle. However, this granted a bit too much advantage to the player – some combat encounters may become too easy when you are able to focus-fire on critical enemy units before they act or take the most advantageous positions before them.

To mitigate this advantage, enemies receive a short reposition phase when they become alert (unless they are Surprised – but I’ll get to that later). During the reposition phase they are allowed to move a short distance, or very rarely execute a single attack instead of moving. Note that these reposition actions are constrained by a much smaller AP limit that the enemy max AP and in no way equally powerful to an entire combat turn.

DevDiary12_02.thumb.jpg.80cbc5af359b828b31ca5b24703eb582.jpg


Stealth

While Stealth is present in Jagged Alliance 3, we didn’t want it to be dominant, turning every encounter into a stealth puzzle - there are other games that specialize in this and Jagged Alliance is not meant to provide that kind of experience. A stealth approach might make the encounter easier, more advantageous for your side or just different… Or sometimes it may go wrong, you may be discovered earlier than intended and that will complicate the encounter instead.

DevDiary12_03.thumb.jpg.af9a71c56c9a7b1f4f4e4c30826fed78.jpg

Enemies are less alert while not in combat and you may take advantage of this by carefully setting up the terms of the engagement. For example, any merc that is out of enemy sight can start to sneak, and will become harder to detect by the enemy. The range and speed of stealth detection depend on various factors – the sneaking character stats and the enemy stats, as well as darkness, foliage and line of sight. It always takes some time for the enemies to detect a sneaking merc, visualized by the in-view UI bar under that character. If the sneaking character executes an attack before being discovered, there is a chance that the attack will result in a Stealth Kill, slaying a single enemy outright. The attack may also Surprise the others, delaying their reposition phase.

Melee attacks from stealth can also be prepared in advance when you are safely out of sight – this provides you extra preparation time to select body part and aim level without the danger of being discovered at this time. The prepared attack will be executed automatically if you manage to sneak in melee range without being discovered. Approaching the target from behind will usually improve your chances to get in melee attack range, but often this is also difficult to pull off, especially when there are multiple enemies involved.

Stealth tactics might be useful mid-combat as well – though in order to start sneaking, you have to be out of enemy sight. Besides, it is much harder to nail a stealth kill against alert enemies, even if they don’t see you.

DevDiary12_04.thumb.jpg.a089400b8055d37084ad6dd396f92c90.jpg


Interrupts and Overwatch

“Interrupts” is an all-encompassing term that we use for any attacks that happen during the opposing team’s turn. Both the mercs and the enemy units utilize the same types of interrupt attacks, but our design goals differ a bit regarding each side. The mercs’ interrupts are meant to give you more options in combat, to facilitate the feeling of “executing a plan” or “setting up a trap”, then watching it come into fruition or fail spectacularly. The same skills serve a different design purpose when being employed by the enemies – in this case they are meant to increase the variety in combat situations and AI tactics and to force you to find creative ways to counter them.

DevDiary12_05.thumb.jpg.4c280da42ea4ab3ece810795a250a382.jpg


The most common type of interrupt action is called Overwatch. The term might make you immediately think about XCom – however our Overwatch skill is more inspired by other tactical titles like Gears Tactics. Instead of being an automated attack against any enemy in attack range, it directs the mercs’ attention in a cone-shaped area of the battlefield and lets them interrupt only enemies that move or make other actions in this area. This gives you a finer control over the action and a bigger decision space, allowing you for example to Overwatch different areas with your mercs, or shorten the attack distance in order to make the attacks more reliable.

The maximum number of Overwatch attacks is limited by the number of remaining Action Points when you set up the Overwatch action. Overwatch attacks can never be aimed or target a specific body part, but they get a passive accuracy bonus from your Dexterity stat. You also lose some defensive benefits while in this stance, so all-in-all it is a tradeoff compared to the regular attacks.

Personally, I tend to prefer Overwatch when the enemies are in good defensive positions during my turn, or when I want to limit their movement or make it disadvantageous in a particular area of the map.

When used before combat encounters, Overwatch works a bit differently. It allows you to set up ambushes that will trigger on enemy reposition when combat starts.

DevDiary12_06.thumb.jpg.3f0a95fa44750c3bced03ebb667cf9d2.jpg



There are some other interrupt attacks in the game as well – some tied to perks, and other to particular weapons. For example, machine guns can be set to suppress a particular area of the battlefield, granting you a limited number of Interrupt attacks against enemies in this area, even after you’ve spent all of your Action Points. Some melee-inclined enemies and mercs with threaten the immediate area around them with melee interrupts, making them a particular nuisance when they manage to get close by.

Weather and Darkness

Environmental effects, such as weather and darkness, make the world more visually varied, believable and alive, but another important design goal behind their existence is to make the combat situations more varied. A combat encounter with the same enemies will feel very different when fought at night or in a thunderstorm, and these environmental effects will often force you to adapt and invent new strategies. Here is a list of all environmental effects in Jagged Alliance 3:

  • Clear weather – no additional gameplay effects.
  • Night/Underground - Enemies in darkness are harder to notice. Ranged attacks against them suffer a low visibility accuracy penalty, except at point blank range.
  • Dust Storm - Movement costs are increased. Cover is more effective. Enemies become Concealed at certain distance. Ranged attacks against concealed foes may become grazing hits.
  • Fire Storm - Visual range is reduced. Characters may lose Energy when standing close to a fire in combat, losing Action points and eventually collapsing unconscious.
  • Fog - Visual range is reduced and enemies become concealed at certain distance.
  • Heat - When receiving Wounds, characters may lose Energy, losing Action Points and eventually collapsing, as with Firestorm.
  • Heavy Rain - Aiming costs are increased. Hearing is impaired. Weapons lose condition and jam more often. Throwable items tend to mishap.
  • Rain - Hearing is impaired. Weapons lose condition and jam more often.
Weather effects are independent from the day/night cycle. Sectors in one area of the global map share the same weather patterns and the weather is different in the wet and dry areas of the world.

Underground areas don’t have weather effects, but they are always considered “dark” and share the gameplay effects with the nighttime encounters. Let’s take a closer look at these conditions.


DevDiary12_07.thumb.jpg.ebc128efe7fdac934d8338fe741dac4e.jpg

In the screenshot above, you will notice there are black and white dots next to the character nameplates. Characters in the dark areas (the ones with the black dots) benefit from the darkness and are harder to hit, while characters with the white dots are “in the light” and receive no such bonuses. A stealth approach benefits from darkness as well, but watch out for moving spotlights that will reveal you!

Obviously, this will change your positioning strategies and encourage you to stay in dark areas, but you can also make use of this mechanic to tilt the odds even further in your favor. Shooting a flare or throwing a glowstick creates “lit” area in the battlefield – but don’t forget that the enemies will use these against you as well. A flashlight weapon attachment will reveal the enemy you are attacking, but it may negate your darkness defensive benefit as well. If you equip night vision goggles, you may gain the upper hand at night, but is it worth it to give up the opportunity to protect your merc with a heavy helmet? How about creating an entire squad of characters specialized and outfitted for night ops and timing your assaults with the day/night cycle?

Of course, you don’t have to do any of this, but even so, your nighttime encounters will feel and look significantly different than normal fights in bright daylight. Combined with the other weather effects, the variety of possibly combat conditions is huge. It will surely keep you on your toes during your war in Grand Chien!

DevDiary12_08.thumb.jpg.4aed7ac93e0890fff9e1226ce5392d78.jpg
 

Strange Fellow

Peculiar
Patron
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
4,258
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
enemies receive a short reposition phase when they become alert (unless they are Surprised – but I’ll get to that later). During the reposition phase they are allowed to move a short distance, or very rarely execute a single attack instead of moving. Note that these reposition actions are constrained by a much smaller AP limit that the enemy max AP and in no way equally powerful to an entire combat turn.
If the sneaking character executes an attack before being discovered, there is a chance that the attack will result in a Stealth Kill, slaying a single enemy outright.

iu


This reminds me, have they said anything about morale and stamina?
 

Harthwain

Arcane
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
5,581
But for some reason you want an ammo icon dragging minigame, because sure, that's something the merc can't be trusted with...
It's more about equipment distribution. With ammo not being an issue you don't have to worry about how much ammo you spend (read: how efficient you are with it), because you always have more in the "bank". With ammo being limited (perhaps even severly so) you have to think more about how well it's spent and consider using another weapon in case you run out.
 

Aemar

Arcane
Joined
Aug 18, 2018
Messages
6,390
Listened to dev stream today. Sounds like all ammo will be in a shared pool, even during combat, not in each individuals inventory. So that's a bummer.

There also will not be weight factored in, however the size of a mercs inventory grid is determined by their strength stat.
Inventory autism is one of the best parts of the genre, 7.62 set the standard for loadouts that would make African guerillas weep and I'm sad JA3 seems to be moving in the opposite direction
Inventory autism is what makes these games the best in their genre, a franchise still unsurpassed since the 90s. Shared ammo pool? Haemimont can go fuck themselves with this travesty of a game. Not a Jagged Alliance game, even if the title says so. Does it sound familiar?
 

thesheeep

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
10,118
Location
Tampere, Finland
Codex 2012 Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
But for some reason you want an ammo icon dragging minigame, because sure, that's something the merc can't be trusted with...
It's more about equipment distribution. With ammo not being an issue you don't have to worry about how much ammo you spend (read: how efficient you are with it), because you always have more in the "bank". With ammo being limited (perhaps even severly so) you have to think more about how well it's spent and consider using another weapon in case you run out.
Oh sure, but I'm assuming the ammo pool that will be in the game is restricted and you have to conserve ammo anyway (if it's restricted in each separate inventory or in a pool is honestly not that much of a difference).

If it isn't restricted, then yeah... that's dumb.
 

ArchAngel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
21,591
Listened to dev stream today. Sounds like all ammo will be in a shared pool, even during combat, not in each individuals inventory. So that's a bummer.

There also will not be weight factored in, however the size of a mercs inventory grid is determined by their strength stat.
Inventory autism is one of the best parts of the genre, 7.62 set the standard for loadouts that would make African guerillas weep and I'm sad JA3 seems to be moving in the opposite direction
Inventory autism is what makes these games the best in their genre, a franchise still unsurpassed since the 90s. Shared ammo pool? Haemimont can go fuck themselves with this travesty of a game. Not a Jagged Alliance game, even if the title says so. Does it sound familiar?
They went soft and made bad choices in many ways and once we get our hands on it I am sure we will find even more bad design choices
 

thesheeep

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
10,118
Location
Tampere, Finland
Codex 2012 Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Nothing about micromanaging ammo is difficult or casual/non-casual.
It's menial. It is so easy to do that it is impossible to fail unless you are entirely braindead. It wastes everyone's time.
This is just not true. Scarcity and scavenging is a big part of Jagged Alliance, at least in the early game. I refer you to my earlier post:
I've often found myself in situations in previous games where a character has run out of ammo. What now? Does he run over to a squadmate and borrow some ammo from him? But now that guy is low on ammo! Does he risk running over to a downed soldier and scavenging his corpse? But oh no, that's the wrong ammo! Better take his crappy gun too, then. Now my guy is a worse shot. He might have to get closer to the enemy before pulling the trigger, or he might be forced to use one of the precious grenades brought along for emergencies.
Can you not relate to this? Then I question whether you've even played the games.
You still get scarcity with an ammo pool - if it is implemented right and not just some unlimited bank not related to what your squad could believably carry with them.
You can still get low on your ammo type and have to think about taking a risky maneuver or not and everything that follows from that.
It's the number of bullets that creates the scarcity, not the number of specific inventory magazine items.

As I wrote above, it depends very strongly on how it is implemented.

Would individual ammo pools per merc be better than a shared one? Sure.
If I made the game, I'd go for single merc ammo pools. You get a slider with how much inventory space you want to reserve for which type of ammo and that's all you need to fiddle with.
With the shared one, you will not have those situations where soldiers are trading magazines. That's one situation among an insanely high number of tense situations.
Good trade, I'll gladly take a shared one if I get spared the hassle of fiddling and dragging individual magazines around in and out of combat.
 

Zombra

An iron rock in the river of blood and evil
Patron
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Messages
11,891
Location
Black Goat Woods !@#*%&^
Make the Codex Great Again! RPG Wokedex Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Enjoy the Revolution! Another revolution around the sun that is. Serpent in the Staglands Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
enemies receive a short reposition phase when they become alert (unless they are Surprised – but I’ll get to that later). During the reposition phase they are allowed to move a short distance, or very rarely execute a single attack instead of moving. Note that these reposition actions are constrained by a much smaller AP limit that the enemy max AP and in no way equally powerful to an entire combat turn.
Nope. Don't like that.
After reading it, it sounds good. It preserves the Jagged Alliance "my turn, then enemy turn". It allows you to still get surprise attacks and eliminate the enemy's chance to pull up their pants. It doesn't do the XCOM stupidity of allowing the enemy to run halfway across the map. But it eliminates the unrealistic (one might even venture "poorly simulated") aspect of combat where at the start of every encounter, one team has to stand their with thumbs up their asses while the entire opposition all make their moves. If you just walk towards them relying on PC Armor to let you go first, it's unrealistic you wouldn't see each other and both sides be somewhat prepared.
 

Strange Fellow

Peculiar
Patron
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
4,258
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
If you just walk towards them relying on PC Armor to let you go first, it's unrealistic you wouldn't see each other and both sides be somewhat prepared.
Try that in the previous games. You'll find that the enemies will make their moves if they spot you before you start shooting at them. If, however, you get to start combat on your terms (which can't happen unless you've spotted them but they haven't spotted you, which realistically should give you a big advantage) there won't be an omnipotent referee going "Hold on there fellas, this just isn't fair. Everyone gets to take five minutes to prepare themselves now." That's just stupid. The situation where every member of your group takes their turn shooting the unaware enemies is an abstraction of them all shooting at the same time, exploiting the element of surprise.

But it eliminates the unrealistic (one might even venture "poorly simulated") aspect of combat where at the start of every encounter, one team has to stand their with thumbs up their asses while the entire opposition all make their moves.
What you've just described is turn-based combat, and the issue you highlight is one this series used to solve with interrupts and now solves (less well) with overwatch.
 

raeven

Educated
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
307
But it eliminates the unrealistic (one might even venture "poorly simulated") aspect of combat where at the start of every encounter, one team has to stand their with thumbs up their asses while the entire opposition all make their moves.
What you've just described is turn-based combat, and the issue you highlight is one this series used to solve with interrupts and now solves (less well) with overwatch.

At least overwatch effectiveness varies depending on how much AP you've got left. It's not the same as arbitary AP to spend as you please during interrupt, but it's better than just having a single shot and gives you more depth of choice in terms of how you spend your turn.
 

bobocrunch

Educated
Joined
Dec 26, 2018
Messages
148
The inventory autism leads to both more interesting and varied gameplay and directly leads to character progression. To use an example from 7.62, finding tape and getting 2 high capacity magazines put together makes you an elite among the emaciated peasants you're shooting 100 rounds at without stopping, and the idea of setting a slider for the ammo carried onto a mission would instantly turn me off because it's abstracting one of the most important parts of tactical games, resource management and not being a retard with a dumb loadout for a fight. It turns it into making sure you bring enough ammo, which I doubt'll ever be an issue when modern games are designed to make sure you don't have problems like that.
 

mondblut

Arcane
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
22,870
Location
Ingrija
And it seems it wasn't for the JA3 devs, either.

Who would have doubted. Romances coming next.

For me it was all about the heavily stat-driven squad-based combat (with varying squad sizes and very varied "missions")

FyrF2WiWIAMJcZl.jpg


It's about gun and tacticool porn. Inventory micromanagement and figuring out which chest rig model out of 50 fits best for a given role and loadout is actually the most important part of the game. Combat itself is just an excuse to test your pimped out gun and a 1000$ tactical beard in action. Making a Jagged Alliance game for people who don't care about this crap is like making a Forza game for people who don't care about pimped out cars and just want to get from point A to point B.

Which, I guess, is not far, since everything has to be brought down to the lowest common denominator.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom