I disagreed that European lore is inherently better
So I am not in the mood to discuss something I didn't mention, what I said was Josh's not-America lore blows. Evidently you were triggered by me writing that "nothing outshines European based lore". I did not actually write "European lore".
I wasn't talking about actual European lore, but derivatives based on it. Now I'm sure you are all up in arms about this, but really - your Asian lore simply hasn't created much interesting *derivative* work. Nothing outshines European based lore in that regard. That means nagas and mages and all that is taken and incorporated into European-based lore, for our entertainment.
Now if you were being intellectually honest, you'd mention that none of these things you talked about are even recognizable in European derivative works, compared to the original. They're twisted and changed to serve European aesthetics and interest. The names are sometimes kept and just about everything else scrapped.
So do you understand? Am I being unclear?
You are also exceptionally butthurt for a Spaniard.
Probably. Yes I probably am.
Probably because half of what you wrote was relativistic drivel and the other half were half-truths and vague insinuations about how supposedly "incredibly interesting" sandnigger "lore" is.
That's what you read as butthurt, when someone rejects this romanticized pile of manure you halfbreeds shovel to gild your otherwise culturally barren existence, after your satanic religion wiped it all out. Always victims. Always lying.