Gerrard
Arcane
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 12,835
That's just product placement, it's not in-game billboards showing real ads that change every week.Amateurs.
That's just product placement, it's not in-game billboards showing real ads that change every week.Amateurs.
Yeah, this looks a bit better. I think Need for Speed: Most Wanted also had in-game Burger Kings.That's just product placement, it's not in-game billboards showing real ads that change every week.
It's not wrong if done for realism (though I suspect developers avoid that due to risk of trademark infringement). But if it's done because the advertizer paid the developer money, you can expect much more intrusive and excessive ads, since advertizers both lack good taste and any interest in the artistic quality of the game.I don't really have anything against backround ads for contemporary games. If I see a burger king ad in NYC, that's just how it's all the time.
And? So does Ubisoft.since advertizers both lack good taste and any interest in the artistic quality of the game.
The solution to that issue is not having your game on a digital platform that automatically updates it and not playing remasters.Putting ads in games is ALWAYS stupid because it means the game will be fucked in fifteen years when it's time to port, like Crazy Taxi. I wouldn't use licensed music for the same reason, unless it was a game that needed it, like Crazy Taxi.
Ubisoft’s new battle game called Champions Tactics: Grimoria Chronicles quickly ran out of its free Warlords digital collectibles. In just a few hours after its public release, the game made over $2 million from these sales, as reported by CryptoSlam.
The new Ubisoft+ and getting gamers comfortable with not owning their games
Link"One of the things we saw is that gamers are used to, a little bit like DVD, having and owning their games. That's the consumer shift that needs to happen. They got comfortable not owning their CD collection or DVD collection. That's a transformation that's been a bit slower to happen [in games]. As gamers grow comfortable in that aspect… you don't lose your progress. If you resume your game at another time, your progress file is still there. That's not been deleted. You don't lose what you've built in the game or your engagement with the game. So it's about feeling comfortable with not owning your game.
"I still have two boxes of DVDs. I definitely understand the gamers perspective with that. But as people embrace that model, they will see that these games will exist, the service will continue, and you'll be able to access them when you feel like. That's reassuring.
Games like Crazy taxi and Tony hawk are defined by their licensed music as much as the gameplay. You would have much worse games without The Offspring going yah yah yah yah yah.Putting ads in games is ALWAYS stupid because it means the game will be fucked in fifteen years when it's time to port, like Crazy Taxi. I wouldn't use licensed music for the same reason, unless it was a game that needed it, like Crazy Taxi.
Isn't the future supposed to be subscription services any way?The new Ubisoft+ and getting gamers comfortable with not owning their games
Link"One of the things we saw is that gamers are used to, a little bit like DVD, having and owning their games. That's the consumer shift that needs to happen. They got comfortable not owning their CD collection or DVD collection. That's a transformation that's been a bit slower to happen [in games]. As gamers grow comfortable in that aspect… you don't lose your progress. If you resume your game at another time, your progress file is still there. That's not been deleted. You don't lose what you've built in the game or your engagement with the game. So it's about feeling comfortable with not owning your game.
"I still have two boxes of DVDs. I definitely understand the gamers perspective with that. But as people embrace that model, they will see that these games will exist, the service will continue, and you'll be able to access them when you feel like. That's reassuring.
But there's also the thousands who buy Baldur's Gate 3 to show that decent company can make money too.
Your future.Isn't the future supposed to be subscription services any way?
I'll admit I have game pass. It's quite handy and it gives you a access to a decent range of games. I also have a huge steam library and I pirate games constantly. Some times game pass has a new release I want to play and it's dirt cheap if you use the work around with old xbox live codes.Your future.Isn't the future supposed to be subscription services any way?