Morkar Left
Guest
Havent played the witcher games, but can you tell me why they are so poor? i was under the impression they they were very good at this.It's too bad Tit Witcher is not a crpg but an arpg. Also too bad the quest design, C&C, and dialogue was mediocre to poor in the first two games.
Perkel said so.
Don't believe him,the dialogue is quite interesting most of the time and it's nothing like the fillery garbage dialogue from Pillars or Wasteland.The C&C were quite mundane in the first game,there was nothing major like in the Witcher 2, where one choice could change your entire playthrough.
I agree with the quest design being pretty bland,it's the usual ''Go there,do that,come back''.
W1 and W2 are good games,great atmosphere and music(especialy in witcher 1) but the terrible combat really ruined the mood.Rollicher 2 was not ''that'' bad ,but the first one was beyond pathetic...wonder what went through their mine when they made it.
I'm just playing the Witcher 1 first time, haven't played Witcher 2. The quests are interesting because you feel more like a private investigator and the first chapter gives you kind of Sleepy Hollow vibes. You have to made your own conclusions (or pay a bit of attention) to get the full picture but it's not always rewarded so far.
For example there was some legwork to prove guilty or innocence of some people. I could prove their innocence in this special matter and was highly suspicious towards one specific guy. I could accuse him of being different than before but I had no option to collar grab him and instead I had to play along with his shenanigans to kill someone I had already proven to be innocent. That was a real bummer. In fact it made me restart the game and playing "as intended".