At first, they should stop taking DNA from retarded fans of Assassin's Creed.They should take a DNA-sample from Tony Jay's corpse, mix it with one from Christopher Lee and create the best Haunt voice-over ever.
Assassin's Creed 2 is the only other video game he has credit for.Somewhat related, does anyone know what other stuff this new guy Romano-whatever has been working on?
Opened it in a new tab in my school library with a lot of girls around but thankfully the link didn't load.Assassin's Creed 2 is the only other video game he has credit for.Somewhat related, does anyone know what other stuff this new guy Romano-whatever has been working on?
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0651451/
As someone who only first played Thief in around 2007, I can safely say that, no, it’s not a very easy game for people not feeling the nostalgia to get into. And Thief is theoretically the exact sort of thing that I would like (a stealth game where it is absolutely worth not being seen/not killing everyone).
Though, poor graphics aside, my main problem with Thief is that the noble whose house the first level takes place in is apparently the size of a large town, and its basement is lined with identical grey corridors (sound familiar?) so, not exactly the best first impressions.
Basically, the levels were too sprawling for me without any real visual reward for exploration and they plodded on from (sorta) tense almost-seen encounter to another.
I assume the game gets better later on, and Thief 2 is probably really good, but ultimately I only enjoyed my experience with Thief 3, partly because everything was more realistically compact in the city, partly because even similar structures looked at least a little different at a glance.
Having played Thief for the first time around 2011-ish, I can say that no, it is not an easy game to get into at all. But I wasn’t terribly bothered by the graphics. It was the clunky, archaic gameplay, the horrible AI and the obtuse level design that killed it for me.
where the fuck does this guy live? Rural Montana?Though, poor graphics aside, my main problem with Thief is that the noble whose house the first level takes place in is apparently the size of a large town
This is coming from the guy who took the time to "explain" the plot of Bioshit: Shitfinite, his complete lack of perspective is well established.
This is coming from the guy who took the time to "explain" the plot of Bioshit: Shitfinite, his complete lack of perspective is well established.
Shamus' article is decent, although his stupid complaint about Thief 2's graphics is what emboldened these babies to open their mouths.
where the fuck does this guy live? Rural Montana?Though, poor graphics aside, my main problem with Thief is that the noble whose house the first level takes place in is apparently the size of a large town
visual reward for exploration
Complaining about too large, realistic levels is ... well, it's decline. Who here honestly prefers the short Thief 3 levels over the massive 1 sprawls?
I assume the game gets better later on, and Thief 2 is probably really good, but ultimately I only enjoyed my experience with Thief 3, partly because everything was more realistically compact in the city, partly because even similar structures looked at least a little different at a glance.
That YouTube video should be the poster child for the ultimate !