Delterius
Arcane
Isn't the penitent religious vampire an ancient trope at this point.The only question I could image here is how he manages to put being a vampire under a hood with being a Muslim
Isn't the penitent religious vampire an ancient trope at this point.The only question I could image here is how he manages to put being a vampire under a hood with being a Muslim
He's a gay black Muslim feminist (who probably vapes and was vegan when he was human). It comes off as a parody of the clamor for diversity. Such people probably exist irl, but as with all cognitive dissonance-inducing states, it comes with either "creative interpretations" (to the point of hyperinterprations) or a lot of mental anguish. But that's besides the point, the context of his introduction is not the best one and it should've been obvious that people would either cringe or riot. Also, gay, black, Muslim and feminist aren't character traits, yet writers use these things as if they are.Why wouldn't it be real? A gay muslim vampire is supposed to be bad, because... ?
The only question I could image here is how he manages to put being a vampire under a hood with being a Muslim (being as ignorant about Islam as I am), but the thread you pointed out explains that pretty well to me.
Seriously, it's not like there are no homosexual Muslims, so depicting them in a game is not an issue.
Or is it that he's backing "progressive" norms? He's a gay Muslim, what do you expect him to do? Establish Sharia law?
Wesp5Wrong in all accounts. Histories were just as absent from Vanilla Bloodlines as the hidden maps restored by Wesp, or the entire ending section that was added latter. Some early mods did restore the Troika made histories. Wesp didn't do just that, he rebalanced them around --- as the histories weren't a finished feature at all.Technically it did have it, it was just set to 0, Wesp's patch just unblocked it. These histories were created by Troika devs not modders.1 - Vanilla Bloodlines didn't have histories, patches added them and mods restored them.
Care to comment on this?
That is what I said. Did we even figure out what Malkavian history with luck was supposed to give?Probably because some were not finished, some were outright broken, some didn't work with other bonuses and most were distributed all over the place regarding to the clans.
Pretty sure wesp5 modified them a bid because not all of them were working properly and fully complete. Like there was a tremere history that supposed to buff your blood magic but there was also an artifact that did the same and they did not stack making it pointless so he changed it. So not all of them 100% vanilla or even finished originally.Technically it did have it, it was just set to 0, Wesp's patch just unblocked it. These histories were created by Troika devs not modders.1 - Vanilla Bloodlines didn't have histories, patches added them and mods restored them.
No Camarilla or neutral clan will associate with a thin-blood diablerist, let alone make them their agent.
And like I said, Autarki is another option.No Camarilla or neutral clan will associate with a thin-blood diablerist, let alone make them their agent.
Of course the neutrals would. Setites? They'd love your corruption obviously. Assamites? Diablerists themselves. Giovanni? They just want more souls. Ravnos? The few remaining are also diablerists. Of the Camarilla, I can easily see Nosferatu, Tremere and Ventrue entering into shady deals of all kinds, if it suits them.
You're missing the gender: woman / trans.Gay black Muslim feminist is the ultimate checklist of character traits for any progressive.
Now that I think of it, Rudi makes perfect sense. I mean sure he comes off as a parody but don't all SJWs?He's a gay black Muslim feminist (who probably vapes and was vegan when he was human). It comes off as a parody of the clamor for diversity.
Funny thing that sexual orientation, race, or gender should be called character trait.You're missing the gender: woman / trans.Gay black Muslim feminist is the ultimate checklist of character traits for any progressive.
A gay muslim vampire is supposed to be bad, because... ?
Nonsense. The system on Bloodlines is simple when compared to others at their time but it does it job to force hard choices on character progression, the major reason we call a game popamole is when it has pretending mechanics, when the game goes out of its way to make its own mechanics irrelevant.Nonsense. Levelling system was simplistic and convoluted at the same time. If it were released 2010+ by "AAA developer", it would be ridiculed as prime example of "dumbing down".
Nonsense. You have 12 skills to choose and 9 attributes not counting the disciplines, and yeah, they offer mostly passive bonus... like every RPG ever.You only had a few basic stats ( with straightforward passive +),
The reason it is because on character creation, a Toreador has a lower pool of physical attributes, for example, yeah, you can make a Toreador brawler but that will be harder than to make a Brujah brawler and you will waste more precious points at it. Depending of the clan choice, you will have a easier time with social interaction or combat. It is convoluted if you are of the Todd Howard Wizard School of Popamole.while skills&talents overlapped one another, giving exactly same bonuses.
Please name me an RPG that doesn't have underutilized skills and hacking is pretty important, unless you have meta knowledge from a walkthrough.Some were completely useless ( Inspection, Hacking, etc),
Yeah... I remember raping everything with an overpowered cypher build I made on Pillows of Eternity... I guess game developers talking alot about balance magically makes games actually balanced... Sure, even after alot of patches, there are obvious better choices on Pillows of Eternity, that same is truth on all RPGs made to this day, especially on games where the developer gone bankrupt right afterwards and it was a miracle it delivered it half finished.others game breaking ( like Celerity).Like everything done by Troika, no effort was even put into "balancing".
Practically required if you are min maxing, if you are just enjoying the game and aren't OCD about it, it is hardly required. This is valid to Fallout 1, Fallout 2, Baldurs Gate and the list goes on and on...And stat/book system practically required metagaming/online guide.
The disciplines are clan exclusive, so you cant do this, if you don't read a guide with the location of every single free skill point and what skills can be ignored, you can't do it either, Bloodlines flaws were design flaws and you had to go out of your way to exploit them while Skyrim was retarded since the very intro. If Bloodlines were like Skyrim, you would be able to align with all the clans and don't being forced to choose a clan but being able to use all the cool powers... wait... this sounds suspiciously familiar to what I heard about Bloodlines 2.On top of this, you could easily max nearly everything by the end of the game, making "character building" virtually pointless. Skyrim was more "hardcore", in comparison.
This is an argument from people that have nothing to say, it is just fucking empty rhetoric and shit social media psychology, you might feel an smart ass saying this but it is just an illusion, don't be a tard.Entire game, as a whole, is a prime example of Codexian: muh precioussss game of muh youth!
This is the only point I agree with you, the ending could be better but I enjoyed the rest of the game... so...Hell, it even has the dumbest resolution in any rpg: in the final act, vampires are running around the streets and casting superpowers, while the whole point of the game is Masquerade (of Vampires secretly living in human society). While the main story is retarded fetch quest to find a sarcophagus so you don't open sarcophagus, so we might as well open the sarcophagus, so nothing really happens if we open ( or not) the sarcophagus.
Did we even figure out what Malkavian history with luck was supposed to give?
It has the Bloodlines name, but this game will be nothing like Bloodlines when it comes to its DNA, its code.Story packs. Weapon skins. Outfits. Pre-order bonuses. The whole nine yards. It's yours for only $100 or whatever the ultra mega edition amounts to.
Goddamn I'm disillusioned. Not sure what I was expecting in this day and age but I guess I'll never get used to it. I can't even imagine how badly this game's been chopped up already.
Pft, fucking story packs, people. That has to be the gayest thing yet.
I'd guess the the person who created the character is likely a white man and felt that adding either one of those traits would make the character too much of a fetish thing.You're missing the gender: woman / trans.
This is the only point I agree with you, the ending could be better but I enjoyed the rest of the game... so...
Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines 2: “It’s definitely taking political stances on what we think are right and wrong”
It just felt like a good place to start to ground it; the conflict between tradition and progress, conflict between money and artistic endeavours.
I don't think anyone denies he's a bit much "in your face". Still, I'd have to see much more than that description to seem him as some parody character. But, yes, the potential is certainly there.He's a gay black Muslim feminist (who probably vapes and was vegan when he was human). It comes off as a parody of the clamor for diversity. Such people probably exist irl, but as with all cognitive dissonance-inducing states, it comes with either "creative interpretations" (to the point of hyperinterprations) or a lot of mental anguish. But that's besides the point, the context of his introduction is not the best one and it should've been obvious that people would either cringe or riot.Why wouldn't it be real? A gay muslim vampire is supposed to be bad, because... ?
The only question I could image here is how he manages to put being a vampire under a hood with being a Muslim (being as ignorant about Islam as I am), but the thread you pointed out explains that pretty well to me.
Seriously, it's not like there are no homosexual Muslims, so depicting them in a game is not an issue.
Or is it that he's backing "progressive" norms? He's a gay Muslim, what do you expect him to do? Establish Sharia law?
The problem is that, even nowadays (or especially nowadays?), you cannot really be a black gay Muslim without that defining a significant part of your life. It's just too exotic not to play an important part of your life, no matter where you are, at least one of these attributes is just going to become "a thing".Also, gay, black, Muslim and feminist aren't character traits, yet writers use these things as if they are. It's the worst part of identity politics, when labels become identity and reduce the complexities of human personality to a handful of qualifiers.