Bigg Boss
Arcane
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
- Messages
- 7,528
What is procelain? I hope I don't get it.
Yet another retard who thinks that the human body is made of procelain once it reaches 50.
What is procelain? I hope I don't get it.
Yet another retard who thinks that the human body is made of procelain once it reaches 50.
That artwork was actually pretty good too. Much better than some badly animated sex scene or something narrated by an old man.And you even get rewarded with illustrated erotica and a quaint little folk tune for doing it.
They did my boy Adam Skorupa a dirty.Most i loved the swamp area and the snowy areas at the end.
But agreed that overall the atmopshere (music, presentation) really carries the game.
I mean the main menu theme music is just phenomenal, along with the gritty background image. Really sets the tone.
Yet another retard who thinks that the human body is made of procelain once it reaches 50.
Most i loved the swamp area and the snowy areas at the end.
But agreed that overall the atmopshere (music, presentation) really carries the game.
I mean the main menu theme music is just phenomenal, along with the gritty background image. Really sets the tone.
What do you mean "Even if the games came out first"? Surely original books are typically better than game based books. And have you read the witcher books? Are you in to fantasy books? Just trying to get an idea of what side you're judging them from, Some one who's not in to fantasy novels or hasn't read the books wouldn't really have an opinion worth considering on this topic. A lot of people would disagree with you on them not being worth reading, including me.Even if the games are out first, its novelizations are nothing worth reading (or relinked with the games) ever. See PST, or BG (bhaalspawn) series
I'll also take backtracking through memorable well designed areas than lifeless area after area like a lot of open world games. When a level is smaller in scope, it's a lot easier to fill it up and make it good. I can still remember my way around the witcher 1 areas while barely remembering witcher 3 areas and always needing a minimap and pointer to get anywhere.I'll take backtracking through a couple of small locations over backtracking through a vast open world filled with repeatable activities any day.
So did you attempt to read them or not? BG and PST had novels written based off of them, not the other way like witcher. Witcher was a big series already before the games came along (in Poland at least). They aren't books that have to be 'gamified' which is what usually ruins novels or movies based off of video games. Plus video games usually have shit stories/characters compared to novels, which is why it's a bad idea to make books based off of games; because even the best video game is just a mediocre book.PST and BG proved that novelizations are bad and worse. I am interested in DnD setting because of them, not vice versa.
Same way with Witcher or Fallout~ I am interested in the setting because of the games, not because of the novels and TVs.
Novels, SF or Fantasy, that I like are very hard to put into games
What is procelain? I hope I don't get it.
Yet another retard who thinks that the human body is made of procelain once it reaches 50.
And yet you haven't answered the question of if you have read them. If you don't think they're important to the lore of the game then whatever, but to try to criticize a book it seems you haven't read is a little ridiculous. The games constantly introduce characters from the books, concepts from the books, talk about the events of the books. you don't even know who Ciri is without the books. You don't think the books can have an impact on the games at all? Even though the whole reason you're looking for Ciri is based off of events that happened in the books? The bad guys are introduced in the books. Without the books so much is left unexplained because CDPR are too lazy to include a paragraph that explains who the wild hunt are, or who Ciri is and why she can do what she can.No no, my basic attitude is that Witcher novels are nowhere near as important or interesting as you fanbois hype it up.
Witchers don't age like humans, can't remember off the top of my head if they actually physically age at all or it's just different.
the books are mediocre and poland owes me reparations for forcing me to read themAnd yet you haven't answered the question of if you have read them. If you don't think they're important to the lore of the game then whatever, but to try to criticize a book it seems you haven't read is a little ridiculous. The games constantly introduce characters from the books, concepts from the books, talk about the events of the books. you don't even know who Ciri is without the books. You don't think the books can have an impact on the games at all? Even though the whole reason you're looking for Ciri is based off of events that happened in the books? The bad guys are introduced in the books. Without the books so much is left unexplained because CDPR are too lazy to include a paragraph that explains who the wild hunt are, or who Ciri is and why she can do what she can.No no, my basic attitude is that Witcher novels are nowhere near as important or interesting as you fanbois hype it up.
Anyways, the books are more interesting than the games.
didn't read lolMost of the worlds most influential works weren't written in "American." I'm not saying witcher is some great influential work, just that English people like to act like they're the center of the world in everything when most of the worlds greatest works aren't english but some other language and were just translated. It's probably beneficial that they didn't have american cuck critics complaining about his books and trying to force him to change every little thing that offends their sensibilities. English speakers should always be behind, enjoying things only after they've been finished.
You don't have to. I just called you an idiot. Should have just left a tag instead.didn't read lol
Absolutely. They change translators around book 3 though, and he's much better. The fan translations are actually a lot better than the official translations, barring the occasional typos. They're also all freeThe Witcher book translations range from poor to meh in English. I read the first few in Croatian, which is much closer to Polish than English and it was like a whole new experience for me. I can't go back to the English ones ever again.
Idiot and obviously Illiterate as well I see. Then to answer your desperate question: NO, I havent read any of the Witcher novels or short stories. And no, they are not interesting enough for me to risk a badly translation version. This is a judgement on the importance of the books: They are not important enough.And yet you haven't answered the question of if you have read them. If you don't think they're important to the lore of the game then whatever, but to try to criticize a book it seems you haven't read is a little ridiculous. The games constantly introduce characters from the books, concepts from the books, talk about the events of the books. you don't even know who Ciri is without the books. You don't think the books can have an impact on the games at all? Even though the whole reason you're looking for Ciri is based off of events that happened in the books? The bad guys are introduced in the books. Without the books so much is left unexplained because CDPR are too lazy to include a paragraph that explains who the wild hunt are, or who Ciri is and why she can do what she can.No no, my basic attitude is that Witcher novels are nowhere near as important or interesting as you fanbois hype it up.