Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Cain on Games - Tim Cain's new YouTube channel

Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Messages
4,336
I think KotOR 2 did a good job informing the player of the game world without resorting to amnesia, by having a multitude of descriptive dialogue choices. Even if the player doesn't pick the line that says "Atris you fucking bitch, your gloating tone reminds me of the day you exiled me from the Jedi Order", they still learn something about the world by just reading it.
KotOR 2 is the avatar of how not to do dialogue. Repeatedly it gives you choices that you're not informed enough to make, because your character knows a bunch of shit that you the player don't.
Kotor 2 is weird. I recently finished it and noticed that you have to have played this game multiple times to really *get* the game. The protagonist- Meetra if you prefer, legitimately knows shit the player doesn't and the correct path through the game is one where Meetra speaks like she knows what she's talking about.

Alternatively, you can choose expository dialogues, but it's clear the narrative can't reconcile this. It's cool having expositoon as dialogue options, but actually choosing them is immersion breaking and only serves to clutter the conversation window on repeat playthroughs

The overwhelming bulk of dialogue options are just expository in nature. It's not that good either, it's stuff like, "Jack? You mean the Jack that did this long-winded important thing? That jack?"

I feel like having the player be the one who gives expository dialogue is a great way to make exposition seem more natural with an extra benefit of not having the player character be some kind of farm boy/ isekayed boy. It also makes the player feel smart.
 

Wesp5

Arcane
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
1,951
Artist is not afraid of some embellishments for extra aesthetics and we know these old ui in games worked, even if "buttohs r different1!".

I agree. I love the Bloodlines GUI because it fits into the atmosphere of the game! Now compare that to the minimalist GUIs of today...
 

Infinitron

I post news
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
99,662
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth


I talk about content of Fallout (and one thing from Fallout 2) that never made it into the shipping game, either because the design was rejected, or we didn't have time to make it, or it wasn't finished by the time the game shipped.
 

Goral

Arcane
Patron
The Real Fanboy
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
3,571
Location
Poland


I talk about content of Fallout (and one thing from Fallout 2) that never made it into the shipping game, either because the design was rejected, or we didn't have time to make it, or it wasn't finished by the time the game shipped.

He says things that make you think that anything by his hand should be pure incline (and it was up until him disbanding Troika), e.g. saying that talking deathclaws or supernatural things in Fallout were a bad design (and he mentioned Chris Avellone who was against ghosts in Fallout 2 for example). All of this suggests that maybe he didn't have much freedom working on TOW.
 

Maxie

Wholesome Chungus
Patron
Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Nov 13, 2021
Messages
8,136
Location
Warszawa, PL
of course arcanum didn't have cut content
imagine my surprise
I heard the gnome "conspiracy" quest was supposed to be more complicated.
i dont care what you did or did not hear for you took no part whatsoever in arcanum's development
tim cain says in the video posted just above that they put whatever ideas they had into arcanum so there was no content to be cut
 

Harthwain

Magister
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
5,426
IDK if a grown man can't figure that out maybe he shouldn't be playing arcanum. I guess it's pointless content and the fast travel button could be marked more clearly but this is definitely a 'can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink' moment.
One thing that could MASSIVELY help is changing "maybe you should consult the map" to "we should avoid the wolves by using fast travel". Especially if the pack of wolves at the end was indeed intended to make you use fast travel mechanic. The way it stands in game is just not clear enough so it's very easy to dismiss, especially considering Virgil's overall attitude towards the player.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,741
IDK if a grown man can't figure that out maybe he shouldn't be playing arcanum. I guess it's pointless content and the fast travel button could be marked more clearly but this is definitely a 'can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink' moment.
One thing that could MASSIVELY help is changing "maybe you should consult the map" to "we should avoid the wolves by using fast travel". Especially if the pack of wolves at the end was indeed intended to make you use fast travel mechanic. The way it stands in game is just not clear enough so it's very easy to dismiss, especially considering Virgil's overall attitude towards the player.
Breaking the fourth wall through character dialogue is really not something they wanted to do and clicking on that first dialogue option does bring it up.
 

Maldoror

Augur
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
175
Location
Junktown
They lost the source code to Fallout? I missed this entirely. I just assumed that Tim had sequestered it away somewhere amongst his plethora of notes and data, and no official sources (obviously discounting the dozens of serious modders who would kill for it) had asked him for it or already had it.
 

Diggfinger

Arcane
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
1,240
Location
Belgium
They lost the source code to Fallout? I missed this entirely. I just assumed that Tim had sequestered it away somewhere amongst his plethora of notes and data, and no official sources (obviously discounting the dozens of serious modders who would kill for it) had asked him for it or already had it.

I thought the team behind Fallout: Nevada (and Sonara) either had or the code, or at least access to parts of it?

Or were they reverse-engineering the original engine....believe that's what the "Fallout 1 in 2" project did
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,741
I thought the team behind Fallout: Nevada (and Sonara) either had or the code, or at least access to parts of it?

Or were they reverse-engineering the original engine....believe that's what the "Fallout 1 in 2" project did
They released a toolset for Fallout 2. Josh Sawyer chastised people for not making stuff with it given all the effort it took to make it happen.
 

Maxie

Wholesome Chungus
Patron
Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Nov 13, 2021
Messages
8,136
Location
Warszawa, PL
I thought the team behind Fallout: Nevada (and Sonara) either had or the code, or at least access to parts of it?

Or were they reverse-engineering the original engine....believe that's what the "Fallout 1 in 2" project did
They released a toolset for Fallout 2. Josh Sawyer chastised people for not making stuff with it given all the effort it took to make it happen.
well bully for him he's devolved into a discoshit developer
 

PapaPetro

Guest
I thought the team behind Fallout: Nevada (and Sonara) either had or the code, or at least access to parts of it?

Or were they reverse-engineering the original engine....believe that's what the "Fallout 1 in 2" project did
They released a toolset for Fallout 2. Josh Sawyer chastised people for not making stuff with it given all the effort it took to make it happen.
It became Fallout Tactics.
 

tommy heavenly6

Learned
Joined
Dec 22, 2022
Messages
217
Cain: "Actually those things that people dislike weren't my fault, blame others"
Avellone: "Not my fault either"
Boyarski: "Nope, not me"
Sawyer: "I dindu nuffin, I was shouting at people to add more gay characters but they didn't listen"

We're running out of names to blame. Who's left?
 

Lhynn

Arcane
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
9,962
Cain: "Actually those things that people dislike weren't my fault, blame others"
Avellone: "Not my fault either"
Boyarski: "Nope, not me"
Sawyer: "I dindu nuffin, I was shouting at people to add more gay characters but they didn't listen"

We're running out of names to blame. Who's left?
No we arent, its sawyer.
 

Terra

Cipher
Joined
Sep 4, 2016
Messages
922
What a letdown, here's hoping a second channel, Cain on Gays, is in the works soon, while the Codex is typically my one-stop shop for homo expertise, doesn't hurt to have a second opinion.
 
Last edited:

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,741
"We can't let people work on the projects they want to because what if we're making a game that no one wants to make?" :lol:

Though Valve having this policy resulted in them not making games at all, so there is some merit to it.
 

Black

Arcane
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
1,873,137
too late mr cain, i've already unsubscribed
much in the vein of fallout perks, your power ups have drawbacks
Ummm, akshually, Marxie, FO perks are pretty much nothing but positives. It's traits that have drawbacks.
Do better.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom